Has it ever been noticed that always on the sunniest days of the year that a health expert would warn against radiation exposure? Or has it ever been noticed that during a long haul flight the in air magazines are clouded with information on radiation energy in the atmosphere? It is quite common to find that people tend to associate radiation to persons who work in a nuclear facilities or astronauts. However the realisation of the fact is that each and every single human being on the planet is affected by radiation and should be aware of their exposure levels because effectively, they could be saving their own lives.
Radiation in simple terms is a way in which energy moves from one place to another, which makes everything virtually radioactive, including ever human being. About one - half of a person’s radiation occurs naturally, whilst the remaining is man-made. (Miksanek, 2013) The major effects of radiation are a variable that is based on the amount of exposure that a human being has. The most notorious effect of radiation is death within a few days or weeks. An extensive number of people have died from being exposed to a significant amount of radiation. Another major negative impact of radiation exposure is cancer. Many studies have shown that a common side effect of overly exposure to radiation over time, have increased the number of cancer cases within the number of affected persons. Cancer cases such as Leukaemia (a type of blood cancer that starts in the bone marrow), is a common denominator as seen from the Japanese survivors of the effects of radiation from the atomic bombing. (Barnaby, 1992)
In conjunction to the major effects of the exposure to radiation, there have also been a number of minor effects. DNA damage is an...
... middle of paper ...
... its effects. The concept is fairly simple; a normal individual would avoid as much as possible inserting a nuclear weapon into their body, but shouldn’t radiation follow the same concept?
Works Cited
Miksanek, Tony. "Radiation: What it is, what You Need to Know." The Booklist 109.9 (2013): 22. ProQuest. Web. 26 Mar. 2014.
Barnaby, N. M. S., and S. Frost. "Assessing the Evidence of Low-Level Radiation Effects." Environmental Management and Health 3.1 (1992): 6. ProQuest. Web. 26 Mar. 2014.
Cmielová, J., et al. "DNA Damage Caused by Ionizing Radiation in Embryonic Diploid Fibroblasts WI-38 Induces both Apoptosis and Senescence." Physiological Research 60.4 (2011): 667-77. ProQuest. Web. 26 Mar. 2014.
Little, Mark P., et al. "Potential Funding Crisis for the Radiation Effects Research Foundation." The Lancet 364.9434 (2004): 557-8. ProQuest. Web. 26 Mar. 2014.
Radiation exposure can affect children as well an children have the risk of being the most harmfully effected by radiation because their body absorbs substances differently also their bodies can or are more likely to get certain kinds of cancers from too much exposure, “they are also closer to the ground, where radioactive fallouts settle.”
Gale, R. (2011). If the unlikely becomes likely: Medical response to nuclear accidents. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 67(2), 10.
13. Frey, Rebecca J. "Radiation therapy." The Gale Encyclopedia of Medicine. Ed. Laurie J. Fundukian. 4th ed. Detroit: Gale, 2011. Science in Context. Web. 24 May 2014.
Radiation Effects Research Foundation. (2007). How radiation affects cells. In Basics About Radiation. Retrieved from http://www.rerf.jp/radfx/basickno_e/radcell.htm
Apoptosis is a distinct form of a programmed cell death ( PCD) or cell suicide , first described by Kerr et. al. in the 1970s(1, 2). It is a normal physiological phenomenon that plays an important role in embryonic development, maintenance of tissue homeostasis and pathology(3) . Apoptosis triggered by exogenous and endogenous stimuli as radiation, oxidative stress and genotoxic chemicals. It is defined by characteristic changes in the nuclear morphology including chromatin condensation and fragmentation , overall cell shrinkage and formation of apoptotic cell bodies. Among the many markers of apoptosis, DNA fragmentation is...
The government fails to mention anything about the dangers of radiation caused by an atomic bomb. This is because the government sees more danger in the heat and blast of an atomic bomb than it does the radiation. The heat can cause a burn similar to a severe sunburn. The blast can cause damage to buildings and anything not properly protected. The radiation has not shown affects yet because when they tested the bomb recently they have not had time to see any longterm
Using NASA's, Space Radiation Cancer Risk Projections and Uncertainties, a model of risk and uncertainties; NASA predicted that central estimates for radiation-induced mortality and morbidity could exceed 5% and 10% with upper 95% confidence interval near 10% and 20%, respectively for a Mars mission. NASA's radiation standard limits astronaut exposures to a 3% risk of exposure induced death at the upper 95% confidence interval of the risk estimate (Cucinotta et al. 42-67). Although the radiation levels on Mars are less than expected, it’s possible Mark would have considerably increased
In 1917 a young female right out of high school started working at a radium factory in Orange, New Jersey. The job was mixing water, glue and radium powder for the task of painting watch dials, aircraft switches, and instrument dials. The paint is newly inventive and cool so without hesitation she paints her nails and lips with her friends all the while not knowing that this paint that is making them radiant, is slowly killing them. This was the life of Grace Fryer. Today there are trepidations on the topic of radiation from fears of nuclear fallout, meltdowns, or acts of terrorism. This uneasiness is a result of events over the past one hundred years showing the dangers of radiation. Although most accidents today leading to death from radiation poisoning occur from human error or faults in equipment, the incident involving the now named "radium girls" transpired from lack of public awareness and safety laws. (introduce topics of the paper)
Williams claimed women in her family died of cancer. From all the evidences we have found, we can confidently insist that nuclear fall-out causes cancer. Therefore, Williams’ claim is evidently correct.
All of those individuals are wrong because there is long term and you still get effect if you are not close. All of this because of radiation exposure and it could cause plenty kind of cancer or even more then one at the same time. Also it better to died by the explosion then suffer and feel pain when dying with cancer.“They are a type of weapon that countries spend enormous sums of money to develop but don’t actually intend to use”(Friedman,Snyder,and Ligon). The author is trying to explain how bomb are completely useless and they just waste a bunch of money. Bomb’s are not supposed to be use but people waste money to make something that they are not supposed to use and hopefully will not use. Why would people waste money into something that cause much pain and deaths and the whole point is that everyone wants to be powerful. In the society today has made a lot of things for safety related with bombs and there no purpose because bombs just cause trouble to our economy. Where the government could giving that money to people who need it instead of bomb’s that will not be used. “The development of nuclear warheads becomes a nation's show of
The greatest density of the radioactive materials released by the accident in the regions surrounding the reactor in the European part of the former Soviet Union. In a total of 134 emergency workers who received high doses of radiation were diagnosed with acute radiation syndrome (ARS). Sadly, 28 of the 134 workers passed away during the first months after the accident in 1986. Luckily, as the radiation doses received were relatively low, the public that were exposed to the Chernobyl fallout did not suffer from ARS. An international expert group predicts that among the 600 000 persons receiving more significant exposures (liquidators working in 1986–1987, evacuees, and residents of the most ‘ contaminated’ areas), the possible increase in cancer mortality due to this radiation exposure might be up to a few per cent, which might eventually represent up to four thousand fatal cancers regarding possible deaths from cancer,
I was given the opportunity to work with the genes of canine and rat cells with the goal of developing a cell model that could affectively portray the affects of radiation treatment. As a Biology and Society major at Cornell, I’d like to enhance my classroom education with a more genuine experience in the numerous opportunities for research. I studied a few publications of Dr. Jeffrey Roberts, a Cornell professor, this past summer and am intrigued by his work on the role of RNA polymerase in gene regulation. I am confident that under his tutelage, I can add to my core knowledge and use it to further my research and to solve current problems in
...S make amends for human radiation experiments." JAMA. v274, n12. September 27, 1995. pp. 933.
The impact of nuclear power on the modern world has improved Various sectors of the economy and society .i.e. Food and Agriculture, Insect control, Food Preservation, Water Resources, Military, Medicine, Research and Industry. “In 1911 George de Hevesy conducted the first application of a radioisotope. At the time de Hevesy was a young Hungarian student working in Manchester with naturally radioactive materials. Not having much money he lived in modest accommodation and took his meals with his landlady. He began to suspect that some of the meals that appeared regularly might be made from leftovers from the preceding days or even weeks, but he could never be sure. To try and confirm his suspicions de Hevesy put a small amount of radioactive material into the remains of a meal. Several days later when the same dish was served again he used a simple radiation detection instrument - a gold leaf electroscope - to check if the food was radioactive. It was, and de Hevesy's suspicions were confirmed.
Yamaguchi, M., & Kashiwakura, I. (2013). Role of reactive oxygen species in the radiation response of human hematopoietic stem/progeny cells. Retrieved from http://ehis.ebscohost.com.prx.library.gatech.edu/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=d059f432-9ed7-40bb-9870-1d5ff0f649c4@sessionmgr4004&vid=5&hid=116