Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Defining communities
Defining communities
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Defining communities
Having a basic understanding of community or national emergency plans can assist families in disaster. This is especially true during the response phase. The National Response Framework (NRF) is a great example of a national community reference. According to FEMA’s publication, “The National Response Framework,” from 2013, the NRF is a guide which describes the basis of national response to any form of disaster. The NRF was developed from a long line of response guidance plans. The first was the Federal Response plan which was replaced by the National Response Plan. Then in 2008, the NRF was developed to make national response guidance more efficient as well as to include practices created after Hurricane Katrina. The NRF is comprised of 4 sections. These are the foundation document, the Emergency Support Functions (ESF) Annexes, the Support Annexes, and the Incident Annexes. These annexes describe how the NRF can be implemented. It is important to note that the NRF and the National Incident Management System (NIMS) are meant to work in conjunction with each other, while NIMS and its component the Incident Command System (ICS) supply the NRF with an incident management function (Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2013c, pp. 2-3). The NRF is based on several guiding principles. These are engaged partnership, tiered response, scalable operations, unity of effort/unified command, and readiness to act (Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2013c, pp. 5-6).
What makes the NRF unique is that it is intended to guide the entire national community’s response efforts. FEMA believes that the inclusion of the whole community is necessary to promote national preparedness. While the NRF notes that individuals and families are not forma...
... middle of paper ...
...ext. In W. L. Waugh, & K. Tierney, Emergency Management: Principles and Practice for Local Government (p. 63). Washington D.C.: International City/County Management Association.
Perry, R. W., & Lindell, M. K. (2007). Disaster Response. In W. L. Waugh, & K. Tiernery, Emergency Management: Principles and Practice for Local Government (pp. 162-163). Washington D.C.: International City/County Management Association.
Sylves, R. T. (2007). Budgeting for Emergency Management. In W. L. Waugh, & K. Tierney, Emergency Management: Principles and Practice for Local Government (p. 312). Washignton D.C.: International City/County Management Association.
Walsh, D. W., Christen, H. T., Christian E. Callsen, G. T., Maniscalco, P. M., Lord, G. C., & Dolan, N. J. (2012). The National Incident Management System: Principles and Practice. Burlington, MA: Bartlett and Jones Learning.
I think the National Incident Management System is a model to be adapted based on the circumstances. It is a good foundation that can be built upon and tailored to each department based on their specific needs and
The impact James Lee Witt made within the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) demonstrates how his effective leadership positively influenced the response and recovery efforts during national emergencies and natural disasters. These same leadership skills, characteristics, and values that Witt brought into his position as Director of FEMA can also be applied to many other public sector managers involved in emergency management. These leadership skills were critical during the crisis of the Northridge earthquake, but were also beneficial to increase the trust and credibility of FEMA’s existence along with increasing public value and perception.
Homeland Security. (2008, 12). National Incident Management System. Retrieved 10 22, 2011, from FEMA: http://www.fema.gov/pdf/emergency/nims/NIMS_core.pdf
Both man-made and natural disasters are often devastating, resource draining and disruptive. Having a basic plan ready for these types of disaster events is key to the success of executing and implementing, as well as assessing the aftermath. There are many different ways to create an emergency operations plan (EOP) to encompass a natural and/or man-made disaster, including following the six stage planning process, collection of information, and identification of threats and hazards. The most important aspect of the US emergency management system in preparing for, mitigating, and responding to man-made and natural disasters is the creation, implementation and assessment of a community’s EOP.
The CPP is inherently different from traditional models developed by federal entities in several ways, the most important being that it is a “bottom-up” planning method as dictated by one of the directives of the Act of 2007. FEMA was asked to partner with State, local and tribal governments, emergency responders, the private sector, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in addition to other federal agencies typically involved with disaster preparedness, response and recovery efforts. Most FEMA and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) systems and methods in the past have been driven from the “top down”, such as the Incident Command System (ICS) and the National Incident Management Systems (NIMS) and have focused on the structure of command and control rather than coordinated partnerships (Ruback et al., 2010). Another significant directive of the Act of 2007 is the specific focus on preparedness for catastrophic events rather than disasters, which are more regional in scope.
Bissell, R. (2010). Catastrophic Readiness and Response Course, Session 6 – Social and Economic Issues. Accessed at http://training.fema.gov/EMIWeb/edu/crr.asp
Communities must come together in order to be aware of the steps that must be taken to reduce or prevent risk. “The guidance, programs, processes, and systems that support each component of the National Preparedness System enable a collaborative, whole community approach to national preparedness that engages individuals, families, communities, private and nonprofit sectors, faith based organizations and all levels of government.” (FEMA, 2011). Resources within a community are prioritized and customized based on community-based issues and local security programs. The resources used as the front line of defense are first responders, such as police officers, firefighters and medical personnel. The resources are provided and prioritized based on the priority of threat and risks to a specific community. Therefore, the threats and risks targeted towards a community must be analyzed and acknowledged in order to apply the correct resources to the opposing prioritized threats. Disasters and emergencies typically begin at the local level and eventually require resources from state and federal
The National Incident Management System, NIMS was introduced in March 2004, and is the country’s comprehensive approach to incident management. It outlines how first responders from different disciplines and jurisdictions can work together. The NIMS improves the coordination and cooperation between the public and private entities in different domestic incident management activities. It also creates a framework for compatibility and interoperability through balancing standardization and flexibility. As such, NIMS comes up with a flexible framework for the federal government to work together with private entities to manage domestic incident management activities.
The National Incident Management System is a dynamic shift that has kept systems, which are proactive in offering guidance to all departments and agencies within the government and the non-governmental organizations. In addition, it aids the private sector by equipping them on how to manage incidents as a team effort involving all threats notwithstanding the cause, the size or location of the incidents. The National Incident Management System has a big role to play in the current state whereby our country is faced by the ever unpredictable nature of terrorism. The National Incident Management System offers various information on possible crimes and how to go about it. NIMS has dedicated information about possible conflicts that may arise in the domestic front during a person’s day to day life.
Responding to and managing either a terror attack or natural disaster will test the resolve and preparedness of the emergency management system that is in place. Large scale incidents, be it terror related or a natural disaster will require sustained resource allocation and logistic support to not only manage the terrorist or natural disaster as it unfolds, but to also support the post incident response as well. Planning is crucial so that first responders and local governments are not caught “flat footed” when a disaster strikes or a terrorist event occurs. Plans provide mechanisms and systems for setting priorities, interpenetrating multiple entities, and ensures communications and other systems are available to support the management of the incident (DHS, 2004).
Hazardous materials can be important in everyday life when properly handled. However, when improperly handled, they can result in injury, death, and destruction as well as have lingering effects that may last for years to come. To address the risk of an uncontrolled hazardous materials release, there must be a coordinated effort to identify, locate, and quantify the hazardous materials in a particular location (Drexel University Safety & Health, 2001). Typically, industry and government agree that a hazardous materials incident is one where
During disasters, emergency response specialists must be able to adjusting actions in relation to specific situations and persuade others to change their minds. When presented with complex problems, they review related information, develop options and implement solutions. Emergency response managers will determine how systems failed in order to prose operational and communication changes. Emergency response specialists often submit reports that measure and critique systems and
The intensity and complexity of managing incidents always has, and will continue to be, in a constant state of change and this change must be accounted for. For decades, emergency responders and preparedness planners struggled with a growing need to involve multiple agencies in responding to disasters/incidents. The need for a single standard incident management system became necessary to ensure all parties involved were able to understand the situation and each other, no matter what agency or region they are from.
Stephens, K. (2010), How can the emergency management community use technology to improve resilience?. Retrieved from http://idisaster.wordpress.com/2010/09/23/how-can-we-use-technology-to-improve-community-resilience/
Tulsa, Oklahoma: Fire Engineering Books. Oliver, C. (2010). The 'Standard'. Catastrophic Disaster Planning and Response. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.