The nation suddenly became alert, the nation suddenly had an opinion, and the nation suddenly cares. The abolitionist movement had a great impact on the nation. The abolitionist movement got the nation’s attention unlike the anti-slavery movement. The anti-slavery movement and the abolitionist movement have the same idea but each have a different purpose. There were many staunch supporters to Abolitionism, being stern and uncompromising enemies of slavery. Anti-Abolitionism, almost costing William Lloyd Garrison his life, also persuaded some members of the movement that they needed a stronger approach to get their point across.
Anti-slavery and abolitionism were not always the same thing. Anti-slavery really cared about keeping slavery out of their territory and keeping it a country for whites. This is where the idea of them standing for free soil came from. William Lloyd Garrison called them white-manism. The ACS organized by white Virginians trying to compromise a gradual freeing of slaves, fund raising through private charity or funds appropriated by state legislatures for the slaves’ masters. The American Colonization Society would then export the slaves out the country and help them find a new society on their own somewhere else. The ACS started to die out private or public funding wasn’t enough to pay the master and move the slaves out of the country. The African Americans themselves started to disagree with the ACS, they did not want to move to a land they knew nothing about, and many of them were now three or more generations removed from Africa. By 1830 the ACS failed to meet their goal which seemed to be to keep the west a country for whites. Abolitionist cared not only for the slaves’ freedom they cared about them bein...
... middle of paper ...
...ld Garrison they would hang him, authorities locked Garrison in jail to save his life. When angry whites invaded Elijah Lovejoy office three times smashing his stuff and he rebuild everything again three times, he was not lucky the fourth he was shot and killed. Anti-abolitionism only made the Abolitionist try harder to end slavery.
Why did Abolitionism change the nation? People knew slavery was wrong, some just needed a movement to go out there and end slavery, it was blacks trying to end slavery only, and some whites started did and got blacks and other whites. Anti-slavery being what it really is could not succeed it was too expensive and would not ever succeed due to the slaves not knowing the land. Anti-abolitionism was violence, abolitionist leaders were violent with their words but they were speaking the truth. The nation is now aware.
Works Cited
brinkley
In the late 19th century African Americans were no longer slaves, but they were definitely not free. When we think of freedom today, we think of something totally different than what they endured in the late 19th century and early 20th century. For about 80 years, black southerners had to deal with these changes and hard times. Most would say that for those 80 years, it was worse than blacks being actual slaves. There are so many things that held down African Americans during this time. Some examples of this would be the involvement of the Jim Crow laws, not having the right to vote, and the lynching and peonage among African Americans.
The abolitionist movement reached its peak between 1830 and 1860. During this period, abolitionists, those who "insisted slavery undermined the freedom, righteousness, order, and prosperity of all society" (McInerney, 8) sought to identify, denounce and abolish this cruel institution using their rights of free speech and free press. With free press and free speech "abolitionists depicted slavery as raw, aggressive power carrying in it's wake the seeds of political, social, economic, and moral dislocation" (McInerney, 18). In other words, the evils of slavery were expressed by abolitionists in an attempt to convince American society that slavery was not only morally wrong, but it also went against the goal of the republic, which was liberty and equality for all. Two prominent abolitionists during this period who utilized the right of free press were William Lloyd Garrison with the Liberator and Frederick Douglass with the North Star. When examining Garrison and Douglass it is apparent that they had different approaches to writing against slavery because of their separate background. However, these differences can also be attributed to the fact that their writing audiences, inspirations and motivations for publishing their respective papers were distinct. Garrison and Douglass also had different but very influential effects on the Abolitionist Movement. These do not make Garrison and Douglass opponents; instead they demonstrate how white and black abolitionists had different approaches, methods, and styles of conveying their common message of abolishing slavery.
The scope of the investigation is limited to the Second Great Awakening and the American Abolitionist Movement from 1830-1839, with the exception of some foundational knowledge of the movement prior to 1830 to highlight the changes within the movement in the 1830s. The investigation included an exploration of various letters, lectures, and sermons by leading abolitionists from the time period and a variety of secondary sources analyzing the Second Great Awakening and the Abolitionist Movement from 1830-1839.
Abolitionists thoughts became progressively conspicuous in Northern places of worship and politics in the 1830’s which contributed to the territorial ill will amongst the North and South, essentially dividing the nation in two. The southern economy grew increasingly dependent on “king cotton” and the system of slaves that sustained it.
Abolitionism quickly gained popularity since 1821 when William Lloyd Garrison assisted in writing an anti-slavery newspaper, The Genius of Universal Emancipation, with Benjamin Lundy. In 1831, abolitionism continued to grow in popularity when William Lloyd Garrison started The Liberator. Although there remained not a need for slaves in the North, slavery remained very big in the South for growing “cash crops.” The majority of the abolitionists who inhabited the North organized speeches, meetings, and newspapers to spread their cause. Initially, only small revolts and fights occurred. However, major events along the way led to the Harpers Ferry Raid. For example, with Kansas choosing whether or not to become a free or slave state. That became the biggest event up until John Brown’s Raid. John Brown had always despised slavery, and this enhanced his chance as an organized revolt. The effect of his raid on Harpers Ferry affected what the South thought about abolitionists and the power that they held.
The abolitionist movement caused major impact on the nation as a whole compared to the antislavery movement before the 1830s. This was due to the major support received in the 1830s by all the leaders that arouse at this time. The commotion caused by all the propaganda published during this movement. As well as the spark left in the nation by the antislavery movement in the nation before 1830s.
Northern abolitionists began organized efforts to end the practice of slavery in the 1800's. But much of the American South, believed that slavery was vital to the continuation of its livelihood and lifestyle and therefore defended the institution of slavery. As the abolition movement picked up, southerners became organized in their support of slavery in what became known as the proslavery movement. Some southerners involved in the movement maintained the position that slavery was like "the law of nature" which allowed the strong to rule the weak. Thus it was appropriate for whites to own blacks as slaves because they believed whites were the dominant race.
The antebellum American antislavery movement began in the 1820s and was sustained over 4 decades by organizations, publications, and small acts of resistance that challenged the legally protected and powerful institution of slavery and the more insidious enemy of black equality, racism. Abolitionists were always a radical minority even in the free states of the North, and the movement was never comprised of a single group of people with unified motivations, goals, and methods. Rather, the movement was fraught with ambiguity over who its leaders would be, how they would go about fighting the institution of slavery, and what the future would be like for black Americans.
But despite patriotic statement and vigorous public against colonization, there was a greater margin among black abolitionists and white who claimed to be abolitionists alike black people. In 1833 sixty reformers from eleven northern gathered in Philadelphia, creating an antislavery movements named American Antislavery Society (AASS). Its immediate goal was to end slavery without compensation for slaves oweners and rejected violence and the used of force. People involved were Quakers, Protestant clergymen, distinguished reformers, including three blacks by the names of Robert Purvis, Jame...
... Anti-slavery advocates argued that God created all man as equals and therefore all men are equals. Pro-slavery advocates pointed to the long line of slavery in the Bible as justification. Both sides used the Bible as their main justification for their reasons against or for slavery. Since the United States was founded on the principle that no man does not stand equal among his peers, resistance to abolishment of slavery could not hold out forever. Slavery went against the perceived true meaning of God’s word and also against the principles of America. The Christian equality of the North won over the hard-nosed Old Testament South. Eventually the equality America was intended to be founded upon was realized when slavery was abolished.
Much like Andrew Jackson, the Abolitionists were able to “steal a page” from Jackson’s “book” and recreate their own version of Jackson’s individuality. The Abolitionists were culturally and socially distanced because of their “radical” view. The Abolition movement allowed numerous social activists to voice the immoral implications of slavery. The bold men and women of the Abolition movement stressed the idea of equality of the races, which was a sentiment that was not shared among many outside of the movement itself. The never-ending debate on the issue of slavery was prominent and plentiful across the states but few believed in abolition much less total and indefinite equality of the slaves. The minority of Americans were Abolitionists, but their cause allowed moral reforms to be heard. Nevertheless, this reform movement was solely based on an individual’s “moral compass”. In Fredrick Douglass’ “Letter ‘to My Old Master,’” he states, “… I am myself; you are yourself; we are two distinct persons, equal persons. What you are I am. You are a man, and so am I.— God created both, and made us separate beings. I am not by nature bound to you, or you to me.” Fredrick Douglass gives a perfect statement on the meaning of the Abolition movement, all men are created by God equally and should be treated as so. Through Douglass’ statement one can see how individualism and reform ideals are capable of allowing
Abolitionism was an issue between the North and South and had been debated in Congress long before the Second Great Awakening. The Second Great Awakening was like a wake up call that slavery was morally wrong and that something had to be done a soon as possible to correct it. The Awakening inspired northerners to take a stand on slavery and confront southerners about this problem. Before, Northerners really did not care about what was going on in the south, as long as they got their cotton to use in the textile mills and could work they were fine. They did not care about slavery because it...
All African Americans thought with the creation of civil rights, they would be free to do what all Americans could do. In the context of civil rights, emancipation means to be free from slavery. The process took much longer than they expected. Many fled to the North to gain their freedom, which was rightfully theirs. Legal slavery was removed from the North, but the population of slaves between the first emancipation and the end of the Civil war doubled, from roughly 1.8 million in 1827 to over four million in 1865. It was very difficult for southern farmers and those who owned slaves to immediately give up a lifestyle they were accustomed to and remove their slaves. White southerners viewed African Americans as their workers. They have lived with this mindset for so long, causing their transition to be challenging compared to the transition of the slaves in the north.
It may appear that in today’s America, slavery is looked down upon, and we’ve developed a long way from the past. However, before and during the Abolitionists Movement there were strong arguments for both sides of the subject. ("Arguments and Justifications: The Abolition of Slavery Project.") The gradual dominance in anti-slavery would not have been possible if people had not risked their lives and social standings to fight for the racial, social, legal, and political liberation for slaves. William Lloyd Garrison, Frederick Douglass, and the Grimke sisters are all prime examples of people who challenged pro-slavery, and protested the idea that one race was superior to another. Although abolitionists fought for their beliefs during this movement in the 1830s up to the year 1870 for the immediate emancipation of slaves, the ending of racial prejudice and segregation would not be possible if not by the influence of those courageous people, and should continue to be reinforced in today’s society. ("Civil Rights Movement.")
One of the larger abolitionist groups, The American Anti-Slavery Society, opposed the Acts of 1793, claiming them to be unconstitutional. They, like many, believed that each state had the right to legislate in regards to its policies on abolition and aimed to convince the South that slaveholding was a heinous crime in the sight of God. The Society also endeavored, in a constitutional way, to influence the Congress to put an end to domestic servitude and prevent its extension into any new state to enter the Union.... ... middle of paper ...