Mythtelling

1032 Words3 Pages

Myth functions as a sacred, oral invitation marking one’s or a community’s crossing of a ritualized threshold toward presence in inner and outer ecologies.

Oral representation of myth allows communities to express and experience their ancestral lineage in a manner simultaneously mysterious and essential. The mystery of the myth renews the relationships of both teller and listener to the land from which the myth emerged. In this manner, the myth is essential to the emergence of the community upon the land. Still, such a sacred medium, the oral invitation-as-myth remains fragile in the hand of humans. Though nature may not forget its co-creative process with its human reflection—nature as reflected in the human experience—humans may forget. Thus, one finds the development of the written language, in its best light, as a preservation of the oral tradition. As Sean Kane notes in Wisdom of the Mythtellers, the written language contains—and often traps—myth in unforeseen ways. One must remember the communal purpose for myth, in terms of ritual, ceremony, or imparting of wisdom in a community, to understand that myth may slip through the cracks of containers. The human being as container must tend then to the story as the story tends to her or him. The spoken word allows seemingly for near-instant representation of mythic or numinous experience, as it doesn’t rely necessarily upon individuals’ learning of written symbols. This suggests that many members of the community may meet myth more fully as it crosses in the mysterious.

The communal aspect of myth refers to the mutual interaction among nature, mythteller, and community in the recognition, representation, and revising of the story. Sean Kane notes that myths emerge around natural...

... middle of paper ...

...ing. Myth remains for me the meaning of my existence in relation to the greater and surrounding ecologies. That I might co-create a myth with nature to enliven with purpose my ‘psycho-ecological niche’, as Bill Plotkin suggests, and contribute that essence in a more fundamental and authentic manner as engagement with the Mystery of the greater ecology means a full and embodied life to me. While I continue to engage my inner and outer ecologies for those instances in which personal and ancestral myth bubble up from the land or whisper from the tree leaves, I am reminded how much distance I experience from both Self and nature. In this way, this lack of living with myth, I approach the grief of a surviving with a soul-less life. From this grief, I imagine, I will each day be reminded of my connection to what is alive around and in me—what myth grows in this process.

Open Document