The Morality in Medieval England from The Miller's Tale by Chaucer

639 Words2 Pages

“The Miller's Tale” in the Canterbury Tales provides insight into the morality of people of medieval England by showing the Miller’s views on religion, heroic ideals, and common morality. Religion at this time was defined by a religious code outlined in the Bible and the ten commandments. Even though all men were expected to live by these laws, those closely related to the church, like Absalom, were expected to never break from these codes. Heroism involved a set of ideals that were meant to guide men to a heroic state of being. A hero was supposed to seek revenge and never let a crime go unpunished. Common morality was the behavioral code all men were expected to follow and it is essentially what we now call common courtesy. This included things such as not tricking or fooling others and not pursuing another mans wife. Through the plot of “The Miller’s Tale” it is evident that the Miller has a strong sense of wrongdoing, and punishes those he sees morally corrupt.
Absalom does not follow the religious mores of his time by approaching and pursuing Alison, and because of his moral corruption he is punished. He does not respect the sacred bond of marriage like he is supposed to. By chasing Alison he also does not respect his own religious promises to god. Being a man devoted to religion meant Absalom's life was not meant to be tied to worldly possessions, but throughout the piece he uses his power as a church clerk and well respected member of his community to stalk and give gifts to Alison. These worldly attachments and his inability to move on from his secular love for material goods and Alison seems to be the source of Absalom’s punishment. As is his custom of the day he seeks Alison out. Upon finding her, he is tricked. This ...

... middle of paper ...

...and married within his own age range it is implied by the Miller that his wife would have never fooled around with another man. If Nicholas and the carpenter had followed common morality they would have never been punished.
Due to the poor moral decisions made by Absalom, Nicholas, and the carpenter, insight into the moral judgement of the miller is provided. The morality of “The Miller’s Tale” as described by Chaucer is interesting and significant because the Miller was defined by society as an uneducated, simple man. So his mental depth was seen as close to none. This idea was accentuated by the Miller’s inability to understand the moral of his own story, saying it was to not be a jealous husband. So, the Miller's deep moral depth is interesting because it may imply that even a weak mind can judge the moral compass of others despite not always knowing exactly why.

Open Document