Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
kohlberg's contributions to our understanding of moral development
kohlberg's contributions to our understanding of moral development
kohlberg's contributions to our understanding of moral development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
As children age they experience a great deal of variance in their abilities related to the numerous aspects of life functioning (Robbins, Chaterjee, & Canda, 2012, p. 260-296). One aspect of functioning is that of moral reasoning. Throughout a person’s childhood, moral skills develop in relating to others and their surroundings. Moral development has been a popular topic of study for many years. Some theorists have developed tools to measure moral functioning. In order know the accuracy of these tools, experiments must be designed and implemented to test hypotheses and findings. An extensive amount of research has been conducted throughout the years on how children develop morally. Moral development has been identified as a person’s sense of right and wrong and their ways of responding to ethical dilemmas (Tichy, Johnson, Johnson, & Roseth, 2010). There are many varying focuses on moral development. Some examples of this variance can be found in studies such as Tichy, Johnson, Johnson, and Roseth’s (2010) study on constructive controversy and moral development, Stifter, Cipriano, Conway, and Kelleher’s (2009) study on temperament and moral development, Passini’s (2010) study of culture and moral development, and Levenson’s (2009) study of gender and moral development. Though these researchers all play an important role in the study of moral development, the theorist most often associated with the subject is Lawrence Kohlberg (Robbins, Chaterjee, & Canda, 2012, p. 277-280). Lawrence Kohlberg has accomplished many findings involving the moral development of children through extensive research (Robbins, Chaterjee, & Canda, 2012, p. 260-296). Kohlberg (1969) suggests that children move through unique stages of moral develo... ... middle of paper ... ...440.x Rest, J., Turiel, E., & Kohlberg, L. (1969). Level of moral development as a determinant of preference and comprehension of moral judgments made by others. Journal Of Personality, 37(2), 225. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.ep8933581 Robbins, S. P., Chatterjee, P., & Canda, E. R. (2012). Contemporary Human Behavior Theory; A Critical Perspective for Social Work (3rd Edition ed.). (C. Campanella, Ed.) Saddle River, NJ: Allyn & Bacon. Stifter, C. A., Cipriano, E., Conway, A., & Kelleher, R. (2009). Temperament and the development of conscience: The moderating role of effortful control. Social Development, 18(2), 353-374. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00491.x Tichy, M., Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Roseth, C. J. (2010). The impact of constructive controversy on moral development. Journal Of Applied Social Psychology, 40(4), 765-787. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00597.x
The background information provided by the author on this issue was determined by an instrument that captures how a person would use moral reasoning. The pre and post test of the Defining Issues Test (DIT) formulated by Rest, Narvaez, Thoma &Bebeau in 1999, was the primary instrument used in collecting data. She also reflected on several social work ethics literature, psychology, marriage, family therapy, counseling that focused on ethical decisions. Kaplan also indicated the Rest’s Neo-Kohlbergian Theory which progressed throughout the year played a significant part in the research study. It focused on how a person can reach their highest stage of development. Lastly, McNeel in 1994 determined that liberal arts programs had the greatest influence on moral reasoning.
...r that students’ thoughts and ideas about moral behavior may differ based on their cultural background.
The two competing theoretical frameworks that attempt to explain the development of morality are cognitive-behavioral and cognitive-developmental. The cognitive-behavioral approach is taken by Liebert, and the cognitive-developmental approach is taken by Kohlberg.
...Virtue, Personality, and Social Relations: Self-Control as the Moral Muscle." Journal of Personality 67.6 (1999): 1165-194. Print.
By reaching the stage of early adulthood, we as an individual will undergo cognitive development, moral development and socio-emotional development (Santrock, 2013). When one experiences cognitive development, s/he will be able to acquire the ability to learn, grasp problem solving skills and able to develop decision making skill (Huitt & Hummel, 2003). Kohlberg’s theory of moral development consists of three levels which consists two sub-levels each. The first level is the pre-conventional morality continued by the conventional morality and post-conventional morality (Mcleod, 2011). According to Huitt (2008), by developing socio-emotional skills, one will be able to have a better understanding in managing emotions and will be able to increase
Proper socialization as an infant has long lasting effects on an individual well into adulthood. Sociality in the form of bonding with one’s mother, friendships or just mental stimulation from sound and touch can help form a person’s personality and determine their moral attitude. Morality correlates to empathy because empathy gives someone the ability to relate to how another is feeling, which in turn could help someone determine what is considered right and wrong. Empathy is associated with being responsible for someone’s ability to make socially acceptable decisions and exhibit moral behavior. When someone is lacking empathy or has been socially stunted such as the case of the Romanian orphans, it is believed that they are more capable of doing immoral things such as stealing, lying and cheating. What is morally acceptable
(Jensen, 2005, p. 69) could be compared with the importance of desired moral reasoning. The
Herbert, Wray. "The Moral Child." U.S. News & World Report . June 3, 1996, pp. 52- 59.
At the pre-conventional level, behavior is motivated by anticipation of pleasure or pain. The child is aware of cultural rules and labels of good or bad and right or wrong. (1) The subject interprets the labels in terms of the physical consequence, such as punishment or reward. (3) The child has an extreme self-interest. The first level of moral thinking is generally found at the elementary school level, before the age of 9. This level is divided into the following two stages. (2)
The moral development of children can depend on many factors. Parenting and upbringing of the child, their environment, social environment, gender, and race are all aspects that can contribute to how a child develops their moral standards and expectations. Many psychologist have tried for several years to develop a theory to how morality is developed. One in particular is Lawrence Kohlberg (1958), his moral development theory is based on the cognitive development of children and it is thought that moral development proceeds and changes as cognitive development occurs (Arnett, 2012). Kohlberg’s moral development theory consist of 3 different levels each containing 2 stages altogether making 6 stages of moral development, as Kohlberg conducted
Many of our inner standards take the form of judgments as to what is right and what is wrong. They constitute the moral and ethical principles by which we guide our conduct. Lawrence Kohlberg refined, extended, and revised Piaget’s basic theory of the development of moral values. Like Piaget, Kohlberg focused on the moral judgements in children rather than their actions. The manner in which moral judgments develop has been studied extensively by Kohlberg, through the questioning of boys seven years old and up. Kohlberg presented his subjects with a number of hypothetical situations involving moral question like the following. If a man’s wife is dying for lack of an expensive drug that he cannot afford, should he steal the drug? If a patient who is fatally ill and in great pain begs for a mercy killing, should the physician agree? By analyzing the answers and particularly the reasoning by which his subjects reached their answers. Kohlberg determined th...
The obedience and punishment orientation is the earliest stage of moral development and is also very common in young children; however, adults are also capable of expressing this stage of reasoning. In this stage, young children perceive rules to be fixed and absolute and that obeying them is a necessary means to avoid punishment (McLeod, S.A., 2013). The individualism and exchange orientation is the second stage of pre-conventional morality. At this stage, children take into account individual points of view and judge their actions based on how they serve individual needs (Cherry, K., 2014, October
Part One:The criticisms of Kohlberg's moral development stages seem to center around three major points, his research methods, the "regression" of stage four, and finally his goals.The first criticism that I would like to address is that of his research methods. Kohlberg is often criticized for not only his subject selection, but also the methods by which he tries to extricate data from those subjects. His initial study consisted of school boys from a private institution in Chicago. The problem with this is fairly obvious, that this does not represent a significant portion of the population to allow for generalized conclusions. In other words, how can we test some boys from Chicago and ascertain that this is how all people develop worldwide?I believe that the answer to this criticism comes from the theory that it relates to.
Jean Piaget (1932) is among the first of psychologists who embraced the touchy issue of morality, and more specifically, the development of morality in children. To summarize his findings, children’s view of morality undergoes many changes as they age, the most important of these beginning around age ten. Essentially, what Piaget uncovered is that a series of changes occur between the ages of 10 and 12, just when the child begins to enter the general stage of formal operations, and intellectual development continues to develop until at least age sixteen. Therefore, a child’s view ...
As I developed, I often questioned the reason behind what I was being taught but I chose to do what was expected of me to be at peace with my peers and superiors. At this point in my development, I was at the conventional stage in Kohlberg's moral development theory. I continued to be in this phase throughout high school. Though, I would often dissect the legitimacy of the moral code I was expected to live by, I rarely deviated from my superiors expectations to remain in good standing with those around