Lying has been a problem since societies were first formed. Some people are great liars, others are not. But, whether someone is a good liar or not, one-tenth of a second is all it takes for subtle changes known as micro expressions to appear and disappear from a person’s face. These micro expressions are a sign of emotion. The people who read these micro expressions are human lie detectors. Although. police have machines such as the polygraph test, which measures body temperature and voice tone to help them detect when people are lying, micro expressions are far more reliable. Micro expressions are more useful to police than polygraph tests because, polygraph tests only detect spikes in emotion, there is little scientific evidence about accuracy, and micro expressions are proven to help people further scientific research.
In the first place, the polygraph test can only detect spikes in emotion unlike micro expressions. Micro expressions are more useful to police because polygraph tests are unreliable; polygraph tests cannot tell which emotion is being felt by the person, they cannot tell why an emotion is being felt, and micro expressions cannot be controlled by people like polygraph tests can. To begin, polygraph tests cannot tell which emotion a person is feeling. Paul Ekman is one of the few scientists who researches micro expressions. He wrote a book called The Polygraph as a Lie Catcher, in this book he addresses the worldwide debate of whether the polygraph is an accurate lie detector. Ekman says, “Remember that the polygraph test is not a lie detector. It only detects emotional arousal” (251). The polygraph test cannot accurately detect the specific emotion a person is feeling; someone may be feeling nervous and the po...
... middle of paper ...
...ons. Guliford,
2010. 211. books.google.com. Web. 30 jan. 2014.
“Microexpressions: More Than Meets the Eye.” Talk of the Nation/Science Friday (NRP) (2013):
Newspaper source. Web. 14 Jan. 2014.
“Micromovements Hold Hidden Information About Severity of Autism, Researches Report.”
newsmedicine.iu.edu. Indiana University, ISUM Newsroom, 2 December 2013. Web. 30
Jan. 2014.
“Polygraph Validity Research.” polygraph.org. American Polygraph Association, 2010. Web. 30
Jan. 2014.
Porter, Stephen, and Leanne Ten Brinkle. “Reading Between the Lies.” People.ok.ubca.ca. N.P. 31
Oct. 2007. Web. 19 Jan. 2014. PDF.
Leach, Amy-May, et al. “The Reliability of Lie Detection Performance.” Law and Human Behavior
33.1 (Feb. 2009): JSTOR. Web. 19 Jan. 2014.
Lock, Carrie. “Deception Detection.” Science News 66.5 (Jul. 31, 2004) : JSTOR. Web. 19 Jan.
2014.
One of the last types of ways investigators are coached to detect deception is in the behavioral attitudes of a person being interviewed such as being unconcerned or over anxious (Kassin, 2005). The success rate of looking for these cues are very successful in telling if an individual is being deceitful and has surpassed any laboratory tests conducted on the subject. The laboratory test however did reveal some interesting facts. The research showed that people who had training and experience did not score better than the control group who received no training. In fact all individuals scored at the chance level with the people who had training scored just above chance or at the chance level. To check if special training in the detection of deception was more accurate a study ...
In the ted talk ,Meyers described about a hot spot in order to spot a liar, it was a deception attitude where two people were having a conversation. A person who is honest would be cooperative , Ie words an honest person would be willing to be helpful in order to get to the truth. For example , there was an interview with president candidate John Edwards who shooked his head yes, while saying no. Meyers also states in the ted talk that the difference between a lying expression and expression that tells the truth is that. The lying face expression is an expression of contempt and also easy to learn, the expression of truth on the other hand is an asymmetrical expression and in expression of contempt .For instance, it could be two people playing in the field but when anger comes into play, the lie will be dismissed. Furthermore, it was revealed that science has surfaced many indicators. An example is that liars are known to shift their upper bodies , point their feet towards an exit and shift their blink
Wells, G. L., & Bradfield, A. L. (1998). “Good, you identified the suspect”: Feedback to eyewitness distorts their reports of the eyewitness experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 360-376.
Vrij, Aldert, Lucy Akehurst, Stavroula Soukara, and Ray Bull. “Detecting Deceit Via Analyses of Verbal and Nonverbal Behavior in Children and Adults.” January 2004. Ohiolink. 7 April, 2004. <http://journals.ohiolink.edu/local-cgi/send-pdf/040314132256522215.pdf>
George Maschke and Gino Scalabrini write, “But fear of being falsely accused may also entail physiological responses measurable by the polygraph and result in truthful persons being accused of deception” (p. 89). The America Psychology Association writes, “An honest person may be nervous when answering truthfully and a dishonest person may be non-anxious. (para. 7).Being nervous because of a test and being scared of being falsely accused could portray the idea of being guilty, when really that is not true. Someone just nervous because of the test could produce inaccurate results.
One of the components of Reid approach is training the interrogators to establish whether a suspect is lying or telling the truth by evaluating the nonverbal and verbal behavior during the interview. Many people question the effectiveness of interrogation training in assisting to discern truth from suspects. According Professor Richard Leo, people are poor in drawing accurate judgments of deception and truth (Leo, 2013). The behavior prompts used police are not diagnostic of deception, the investigators cannot differentiate false from truth denials of guilt, and yet they maintain they draw accurate
Sutliff, Usha. “‘Liars’ Brains Wired Differently.” USC News. USC University of Southern California. 19 Sept. 2005. Web. 11 December 2013.
The polygraph test, introduced nearly a century ago, has been widely used in the detection of deception and for some time, has been considered by law enforcement representatives, an exceptionally valid testing apparatus. The media and law enforcement representatives describe the various methods of detecting deception to be extremely valid and reliable in detecting deceptive cues, although the various research done through field studies and controlled experiments demonstrate significant error rates amongst the various testing procedures used. Physiological responses of an individual may vary from person to person. No matter how small the error rate may be, there is always a chance that environmental conditions as well as physiological conditions induced by the individual or the interpreter can have an effect on the interpretational conclusion of what were considered to be deceptive cues. These influential factors may illustrate a small positive or negative error rate, but when the conclusion is applied to a conviction, it can possibly establish or distinguish false results to be accurate or inconclusive.
Posed facial expression are known to manipulate a falsifying expression to the receiver while the falsify expression not internally felt (Remland, 2017). Concealment can be defined as the act of hiding or prevent something from being known. It was discussed that the cheaters would have posed facial expression when caught in the infidelity act by the accusers. For the male cheaters, this was the case. Sharon Waites (the accuser) significant other, Phillip Bentley posed his facial expression when he saw Sharon and the cameras enter. During “The Confrontation”, Philip was trying to conceal his emotions of laughter. He had a very serious face in the beginning which could have been analyzed as a mad spontaneous expression until he let his serious
Thesis: To inform my audience about polygraphs, the polygraph tests, and the controversy of them.
The polygraph is a very controversial topic when comes to the introduction of the techniques into court. The polygraph technique has not changed since first developed in 1895. What the polygraph does is measures the blood pressure fluctuation, pulse rate and respiratory rate changes. The rate of the blood pressure, pulse and respiratory rate not only changes due to the body being stressed because the person is lying, but it also changes due to anxiety, anger and medical conditions. This will affect the accuracy on the technique and give inconsistent readings within the results (Gailus, C., 2008, November
A polygraph test can record a person's breathing rate, pulse, blood pressure, perspiration and other significant physiological changes that suggest a person is lying, but it should not be used as evidence in a court of law because it does not provide reliable proof of a person's physical reaction to the stress of lying.
During the identification and prosecution of a suspect, eyewitnesses are of the utmost importance. They provide crucial information that determines the fate of the criminal, whether their memories are true to the event or slightly altered. Many eyewitnesses, being the victims of these crimes, have strong emotions related to the event. It has been found that emotions play a role in the accuracy and completeness of memories, especially in eyewitness testimony (Huston, Clifford, Phillips, & Memon, 2013). When emotions are negative in content, accuracy increases for memory of an event (Storbeck & Clore, 2005; Block, Greenberg, & Goodman, 2009). This finding holds true for all types of eyewitnesses, including children. There is no difference in memory between children and adults for aversive events, suggesting that the child eyewitness is just as capable as the adult eyewitness to give an accurate testimony (Cordon, Melinder, Goodman, & Edelstein, 2012). For my research paper, I will focus on the role of emotion in children’s eyewitness testimony.
A popular way on many crime dramas to determine if a suspect is lying or telling the truth is by hooking them up to a polygraph machine. In a matter of a minute the police are able to determine if the suspect is lying and guilty or, on the rare occasion, telling the truth and innocent. But, one has to wonder, is it really that simple? Polygraphs measure four main factors that are thought to change when a lie is told and more importantly, it is assumed that these changes indicate deception. The four main factors are blood pressure, heart beat, perspiration, and breathing and these are recorded by using simple devices. It is important to note from the beginning that those who question the reliability of polygraphs do not doubt the reliability of the measurements, but the ability of the measurements to indicate and/or prove deception. Even though doubt exists as to the reliability, polygraphs are used not only in law enforcement settings, but also in intelligence agencies, in the maintaining security of industry, and for public safety and service around the world. Despite its prevalence, there are many groups that call into question the effectiveness, reliability, and fairness of polygraph testing. This paper will explore this question by first looking into the history of polygraphs including court rulings and how polygraph tests are done, then current use, and finally looking at sources of bias and error in the test and the process.
Speech analysis has a type called the voice stress analysis that detects stress in the form of micro tremors in the speech of a person. It is important to note that the voice stress analysis is equivalent to polygraph. Both polygraph and stress have a common problem of not being able to point out deception. This notwithstanding, the speech analysis is apparently being used by both the Federal Bureau of Investigations and the Central Intelligence Agency of the United States. The fact that each and every person possesses a unique voiceprint makes the identification of a speaker to be theoretically possible. This can be achieved through acoustic analysis of the intonation counters, pitch and vowel length. When the pairs of the spectrographs that show the suspect speaker and the known speaker uttering similar words are matched, the speaker can be easily identified (Olsson 2004, p. 71).