Medical Technology Does Not Lead to Better Overall Health

1057 Words3 Pages

Some say that because medical technology has come a long way and has improved it benefits overall health. Many people question whether improved medical technology has really helped us. Studies show that it hasn’t. The cost of medical care in general is on the rise due to the high cost of trying to introduce new technology. When we see advancements in this kind of technology most people automatically think it’s a good thing, but is it really? To answer that question it is not. U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment stated “technologies that are introduced are sometimes unsafe or ineffective or have unanticipated costs associated with their use; limited resources are probably not being used effectively to provide the best medical care to the largest number of our citizens.”
There are many clinical trials that a new piece of technology must go through before it can be used, which sounds like a good process. However, that means the cost of that will rise due to the expenses of the clinical trial and in turn will have to increase the cost of a procedure to be done to cover the overall cost. Some of this technology is difficult to perform as well.
In other studies they may argue that the benefits outweigh the cost, however it doesn’t. The patient only benefits if the technology is safe and efficacious. An example of this is gastric freezing, it was introduced in 1962. There were 25,000 procedures done and the effects of this caused harm to the patients, not benefiting them at all. They ended up abandoning this procedure in 1966. The methods in which they determine if new technology can be used is ineffective and poorly developed.
Due to the advancement in technology it has increased the use of MRI’s, CT scans, a...

... middle of paper ...

...e the technology, it can become stressful.
Due to the amount of money spent on new medical technology, eventually this will affect people who may be eligible for social security and even a pension. It can also start to decrease the amount of jobs that are available. If there is a computer that can do everything that a receptionist or medical assistant normally does, there would be no need for them. This also takes away the personal contact that a patient has with a doctor or nurse.
They focus all their time on the machines and computers and that takes away from the care that a patient deserves. U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment asked the question “Is the potential for improving technical quality of care worth the risk of dehumanization?” The scientist that are creating this new medical technology should realize that newer isn’t always better.

Open Document