Maori Body in Paul Gauguin´s Western Eves

1381 Words3 Pages

Europe’s perception of the Maori body in many ways mirrored earlier models for knowing the body of the Other. Like the African, the South Sea Islander is simultaneously seen as monstrous and idealized. While deemed monstrous due to practices of cannibalism and tattooing, the idea of the noble savage and the vahine suggests an idealized notion of the feminine other. Maori culture as a whole was massively coded as feminine, stressing a sense of gentleness and passivitiy. Furthermore, for Paul Gauguin, Tahiti was easily accessible due to the French status of possession, and its culture easily available due to 100 years of previous representation. His desire to depict a “primitive” woman in contrast to the Western bourgeois woman became a preoccupation within his art during his time in Tahiti. The Western Eve, who was warped by civilizing influences such as the institution of marriage became subverted in Gauguin’s art for the primitive Eve, founded in Rousseau’s discourse of the “noble savage,” as well as Gauguin’s dreams of Tahiti as an earthly paradise. He saw the Tahitian eve as sexual without shame, innocent, and could be taken freely without guilt. His Eves submitted to their biological fate, while their bodies were diminished by conflicting ideologies of sexuality and purist primitivism, or conceived of as the nurturing maternal. However, before examining the images of his Eves, I would first like to briefly outline Gauguin’s earlier experiences with primitive cultures, as well as the primitivism which characterizes his art.
Paul Gauguin was born in Paris in 1848. A year after his birth, his family moved to Lima Peru due to mounting political tensions in France, and remained there for several years. There, he was subject to a ...

... middle of paper ...

...ighlights the problematic position of Gauguin as a self-proclaimed savage, and European observer. Although there are numerous depictions of Eve during his first stay in Tahiti, I have chosen to focus on four, all produced during 1892, in which Gauguin has combined elements of Christianity and Tahitian myth based on Moerenhout’s writings. My contention is that these paintings must necessarily be read as images operating within a colonial discourse, and in fact reinforce European stereotypes of the female Maori body. Furthermore, the fact that he chooses to depict these women based on a Christian figure superimposed with symbolism from an ancient religion which has been translated and codified by European men certainly lends itself to a colonial interpretation which also disrupts Gauguin’s self-image as a true savage, and belies his position as a European outsider.

Open Document