Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Positive impacts of british colonization in india
Colonialism and its effect
Effect Of Colonialism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Positive impacts of british colonization in india
"Colonised people are not simply those whose labour has been appropriated but those whose soul dwells an inferiority complex created by the death and burial of the its local cultural originality" How true is this statement?
I agree with this statement to quite a large extent. I think that souls of colonized people dwell an inferiority complex created by both the colonial rule and the death and burial of the local cultural originality. Moreover, I believe that ` inferiority complex' and the `death and burial of cultural originality' will later become two components of a vicious circle as time goes by.
It is easily understood that colonized people are those whose physical labour has been appropriated. People's lives are always affected by government, politics and economy. Colonised people are under the rule of a foreign country and their government is run by a foreign ruler. They have to obey the laws set up by the government. So, theirs lives are actually controlled by the foreigners and theoretically, they are properties of the foreign ruler.
I think that colonial rule will create inferiority complex among the colonized people. Evidences can be found in the book "The God of Small Things". The book is set in India. India was defeated by Britain many centuries ago and then became a British colony. During the colonial rule which lasted for more than a century, the British helped to develop India and hence, raise the living standard of the Indians. The stable lives under British rule showed a big contrast with the poverty and famine which were commonly found in the past under the rule of the local government. The Indians started thinking that their culture is inferior to that of the foreign ruler.
...
... middle of paper ...
...at "death and burial of the local cultural originality" creates inferiority complex among colonized people. However, as times goes by, their inferior feeling makes people accept more foreign ideas. As more foreign ideas are accepted and foreign culture is having greater impact on people, local cultural originality may be forced to "die". Then, a vicious circle is created.
On the whole, it's absolutely correct to say that "colonized people are not simply those whose labour has been appropriated but those whose soul dwells an inferiority complex". This inferiority complex is not just created by the death and burial of the local cultural originality but also by colonial rule. Moreover, the inferiority complex among people and the death of cultural originality are complementary, they will be in a vicious circle as time passes by.
Césaire states that “colonization works to decline the colonizer, to brutalize him in the truest sense of the word, to degrade him, to awaken him to buried instincts, to covetousness, violence, race hatred and moral relativism” (Césaire, 173). This can be seen
In his introductory article, “Introducing Settler Colonial Studies,” Lorenzo Veracini makes the case for a distinction between colonialism and settler colonialism and attempts to argue for the necessity of making distinctions between them. Veracini marks the distinction between colonialism and settler colonialism through saying that colonialism is a matter of the Settler proclaiming “you, work for me” and settler colonialism “you, go away.” Though, these simple distinctions are misleading and require a much deeper analysis of what constitutes “work” and what constitutes “going away.” It is also worth thinking about how the Settler comes to be shaped by the demands themselves and how the Settler as ontological position becomes different in the demands.
Post-colonialism is a discourse draped in history. In one point in time or another, European colonialism dominated most non-European lands since the end of the Renaissance. Naturally, colonialists depicted the cultures of non-Europeans incorrectly and inferior. Traditionally, the canon has misappropriated and misrepresented these cultures, but also the Western academia has yet to teach us the valuable and basic lessons that allow true representations to develop. Partly in response, Post-colonialism arose. Though this term is a broad one, Post-colonialists generally agree on certain key principles. They understand that colonialism exploits the dominated people or country in one way or another, evoking inequalities. Examples of past inequalities include “genocide, economic exploitation, cultural decimation and political exclusion…” (Loomba 9-10). They abhor traditional colonialism but also believe that every people, through the context of their own cultures, have something to contribute to our understanding of human nature (Loomba 1-20). This is the theme that Lewis prescribes in his, self described, “satirical fantasy”, Out of the Silent Planet (Of Other 77).
And. the colonist historian dismisses those few native people as primitive and savage types who actually benefited from being conquered." ... ... middle of paper ... ... Islands have been destroyed and hundreds of thousands of people have reaped the consequences, yet they are only Pacific Islanders.
[2] No matter who the colonizer is, the problem with all historical documents is that they cannot be separated from the subjective interests that create them. Mexican poet and novelist Octavio Paz writes, "Historical circumstances explain our character to the extent that our character explains those circumstances. Both are the same" (72). Our history implicates how we, as individuals and a culture, judge ourselves. There is always a vested present interest in how we view ourselves in the past. And even for those historians who are trying to voice the oppresseds' counter-histories, the historical text will still be inscribed through his/her present ideological limits that bind historical circumstances to character.
show that the culture that was discovered was worth taking and the inhabitants that were living there were inferior. Even though Columbus' descriptions of the Natives may have been accurate his impressions of them being inferior set the initial impressions of inferiority in the minds of the Old World. Works Cited 1. Amerindian Images and the Legacy of Columbus, Jara,Rene and Spadaccini,Nicholas Editors University Press of Minnesota, 1992 a) Debry's LasCasas, Conley, Tom b) 2. First Images of America, Chiappelli,Fedi Editor California Press 1976 a) The Earliest Accoumts of the New World Gerbi, Antonello b) Images of America in the German Renaissance, Jantz, Harold c)
The beginnings of colonialism, allowed Europeans to travel the world and meet different kinds of people. Their first encounter with the New World and these new peoples, created the opening ideas of inequality. These new people were called indigenous people and alien like. Europeans began to question if these people were really human and had the same intellectual capacity as Europeans did. “Alternative ideas about the origins and identities of indigenous peoples also began to appear early in the 16th century...
To completely understand this impact of colonisation on indigenous cultures however, we must first define the meaning of the word ‘colonisation’. We will then examine the various effects, both positive and negative that colonisation has had on the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
It is the colonisation of North America that opened ways to the European expansion of their colonies across the world and exercised the different colonial forms that were used to inhabit other regions within their state. North America was a home to many races since the early centuries and has continued to be so. The European model of colonisation was therefore separated depending on the types of races that populated the place during that time. For instance Holloway (1966) observes that the spirits of democracy and equality were defended in some of the English colonies right from the beginning of their colonisation spree around the globe. However, these humane treatments excluded women, African Americans and Native Americans who formed a considerable number of inhabitants in North America during the European colonial days. These exclusions were meant by the European colonialists to facilitate the possibilities of creating the utopian society that they desired to achieve in
Throughout times there has been this belief that one’s culture is better than others. We believe that our traditions, food, clothing, and customs are superior to those in other cultures. This belief system is called ethnocentrism. Ethnocentrism originates from the Greek words “ethnos” meaning “people” and “Centrism” meaning “center” (“What Does Ethnocentrism Mean?”). This means that one’s ideas and values are centered on the superiority of their own group. Having an ethnocentric attitude changes how we view other cultures and limits our capability to be culturally relative to others not a part of our own.
...t by rearranging its content to instigate a higher dominance. Colonization is a continuing process but with the help of critical thinking it could mean a change in understanding cultural differences and history that is expressed in history textbooks.
She points out how white tourists think that the establishments and systems left behind from colonization are things that the natives should be thankful for. White tourists think that the natives “are not responsible for what you have; you owe them nothing; in fact, you did them a big favour, and you can provide one hundred examples.” (10) Ironically, while they seem to think that the natives should be thankful for certain remnants of colonization, white tourists refuse to take responsibility for the actions of their ancestors that caused former colonies to be in the state they are in now. In thinking that the “West got rich not from the free …and then undervalued labour” (10), but instead through the “ingenuity of small shopkeepers in Sheffield and Yorkshire and Lancashire, or wherever”, white tourists refuse to acknowledge that it was the oppression of these former colonies that led to the growth of their own race whilst attributing to the decline of these colonies. In believing in their own superiority and refusing to acknowledge this, white tourists continue to willingly take part in a system that oppresses natives of formerly colonized islands because they see no wrong in doing
Lives of indigenous people were changed immensely during European Imperialism as hundreds of nations were exploited during the time period between 1830 and 1930. “By the early 20th century, Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands, Denmark, Spain, and Portugal together held sway over almost 84 percent of the earth’s surface.” Colonies developed in these foreign societies benefited the European empire economically in many forms. Henceforth, imperialism was primarily an economic rationale for the empire, which supplied the home country with essential raw materials, a cheap labour force, and a new market for goods in an era of increasing global trade. The economic advantages of imperialism eventually moved to a belief in white
To begin, the term colonialism is defined in the dictionary as “control by one country over another and its people”. Throughout history colonialism has confounded and damaged numerous cultures and people. Indigenous people have undergone a series of massive modifications to their culture as well as spiritual beliefs and morals and obligations they’ve held since before the first coming of Western cultures. In regards to this, there are many concerns of loss of culture among several different groups.
This perspective allows readers to understand the negative ways that colonization affects the colonized. Historical fiction like God’s Bits of Wood and No Longer at Ease are good educational tools to shed light on the history and effects of colonization, but they do not provide a completely reliable source for factual information. God’s Bits of Wood and No Longer at Ease are similar in their displays of linguistic colonization by their colonizers. In both novels, the linguistic colonization affects those colonized by creating conflict between different the social classes and generations.... ...