Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Sub-prime mortgage crisis in the united states
Mortgage foreclosure crisis of 2008
Sub-prime mortgage crisis in the united states
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Sub-prime mortgage crisis in the united states
Making Home a Home: Solving the Foreclosure Crisis
Foreclosures have always been a fixture of America’s economic landscape. Unfortunately, the prevalence of foreclosures today has warranted the use of the word “crisis.” This crisis is not without its nuances, however; it is far from monolithic. While all foreclosures have the same result and usually involve sad families evicted from their homes, this crisis has had three distinct waves, each with its own (and sometimes overlapping) causes. As per the New York Times, the first wave was due to speculators and falling real estate prices; the second wave was due to risky mortgages, whose interest rates rose higher than the homeowners expected; and the third wave has been due to unemployed families unable to make their mortgage payments. Since the last wave is the current one and thus the one needing solutions, the third wave is the one I will focus most on.
In addition to being the most current, the third wave has the most potential to grow. The population of speculators and people who took out risky mortgages pales in comparison to the population of homeowners who have standard mortgages and depend on their work to keep up with payments. For these homeowners, any break in employment can force them to delay or even miss mortgage payments. Their foreclosures are the most unexpected. These homeowners were not looking to make a profit and took out prime mortgages. They have played by the rules and worked in order to have a home. In addition to reducing foreclosures, one of my goals in solving the foreclosure crisis is to keep these homeowners housed. Though the two goals seem similar, the policies I want to see set in motion will clarify the difference.
As mentioned e...
... middle of paper ...
...t to make sure banks are not benefiting unduly in my plan by modifying the mortgages unreasonably, so my plan calls for more regulation.
While my plan may seem naively straightforward—superficially, simply suspending foreclosures—I have outlined reasons why my plan benefits all involved. Foreclosures are not advantageous to either banks or homeowners, but there did not seem fair way to end them. My plan is fair and would present both sides with a solution they like. By taking an easy-to-understand idea and elaborating specifically on the negative effects of foreclosures, I can persuade the banks; and, by prioritizing keeping families in their homes, I can persuade homeowners. I do not simply want to make homes affordable, as per the current legislation. I want to make houses homes. I want to end the foreclosure crisis, and I believe my plan is a step to take.
...direct control over the agents who deal directly with the consumer. The practices of these independent agents cannot be easily controlled. As a result, corporations should require mortgage brokers to screen all of their loan applications to avoid any allegations of predatory lending.
Dodd-Frank Act was “based on a set of beliefs about the causes and consequences of the housing boom and collapse that preceded the recession” (Johnston). This act ensured that mortgage terms are suitable for borrowers from lenders, imposing massive legal risks on any lender that decides to write mortgage contracts that do not meet up to “qualified” mortgages. In the early 2000s bankers and mortgage brokers used high-pressure sales tactics and even using fraud to sell
The last quarter twelve percent (12%) of American homes are in default of their loan, or in foreclosure. Add that to the previous four quarters and that is eight point seven (8.7) million homes in crisis. (Further on known as HIC's) The United States “Bail Out” helped major mortgage corporations, and their chief executive officers (CEO's), but not the families that are in, or were in these HIC's across America.
To solve the foreclosure crisis we must take a multi-pronged approach that tackles the issues making the situation worse and that caused the problems in the first place. Our goal is to do this in an efficient and time conscious manner. Any solution is going to have its positive and negative aspects but we must try to maximize the former and minimize the latter.
Posing the problem of solving the foreclosure crisis first begs the question – “is there really a foreclosure crisis?”
In essence, the problem leading to the foreclosure crisis is the recent decrease in people’s ability to make their loan payments due to job loss and lower wages brought on by the economy’s weak state. Rather than throw billions of dollars at big banks in the hope that they find ways to help the homeowners’ loans, the government should attack the problem through the individual. Simply, the government aid being spent in the hopes of stimulating the economy should be funneled toward reducing the balance of home loans to make the monthly payments affordable for the owner. By funneling the government aid directly to the American home owner in need, the economy would greatly benefit as homeowners regain their footing with their budget because the economy and foreclosure are directly related. When one hurts, so does the other; when one prospers, the other does as we...
In addition, we have the CFPB, which is tasked with preventing predatory mortgage lending, this is believed to reflect that belief that the subprime mortgage lending was the key cause in the 2008 crisis. Furthermore, it no longer allows for mortgage brokers to earn increased commissions for closing loans with higher interest rates or fees. Eliminating the incentive of predatory mortgage
The mortgage and banking industries have always been very competitive. (In York County alone, there are 275 banking and lending institutions.) The historically low intere...
The foreclosure crisis has been devastating. Families no longer able to afford mortgage payments are forced into bankruptcy, while banks find themselves with properties valued at less than the loan principal. Solutions proposed thus far have primarily focused on loan re-modification measures that only slightly relieve the financial burden for homeowners and frustrate lenders who are forced into less attractive loan terms. However, one solution not being discussed in congress may resolve the housing market slump while benefiting families and investors alike.
Foreclosure in America has been a rising and prominent problem recently, and has destroyed many Americans hopes and dreams. Over 2.3 million homes were foreclosed in 2008, and an estimated four million homes will be foreclosed by the end of this year. Despite the efforts of many banks and lending companies, over half of homes will foreclose that have received their help. I believe that we have only started in the right direction in solving the foreclosure crisis. Giving money and lowering mortgage rates will help, but I believe we should find out why Americans are in this situation in the first place. We are being too stereotypical when we think the only reason someone is foreclosing is because of irresponsible payments or buying a home out of a person’s capabilities to pay for it. If we understand their situation, we will be better enabled to help and solve their crisis.
Not since the Great Depression of 1929 has America experienced such economic chaos, job and housing loss. Perhaps housing loss was not as wide-spread then since there were fewer homeowners. The government supposedly put in measures designed not to let those on Wall Street cause the same thing to happen again. Yet, here we are some eighty years later in the same situation. It seems that history keeps repeating itself. The question is why? The answer is greed. Unfortunately, the question "how can we stop it from happening again"? cannot be answered in one definitive statement. Of course the solution to preventing home foreclosures is "prevention," which in itself comes with a lot of variables.
It’s important to note that the solutions made above should be on a person-to-person basis and do not apply to everyone. Yet, if possible, it is to the best interest of all parties to see that these solutions are implemented. For in every city, in every neighborhood, and on every street, there is someone facing foreclosure. If not for the empathy of another’s pain, then look at it in terms of how it’s hurting you. If you’re a neighbor, you’re left with an unsafe, empty neighborhood and a house that’s worth considerably less because of it. If you’re a bank, you’re left owning a house with unpaid mortgages and annual property taxes. If you’re an investor, you see your shares decreasing in value which takes money out of your own pocket. The foreclosure crisis affects everyone, and it’s about time that we realize that.
The “bad” mortgages banks were writing, high interest rates, and world financial uncertainty were the main culprits to the financial crisis of 2008. “Some three years after the collapse of the financial industry, a bipartisan report from the Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations has determined that banks, regulators and credit agencies ...