Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What i have learnt from doing an essay on jehovah witnesses and the refusal of blood transfusions
Blood transfusions jehovah witness essay
Ethical issues in health care
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What i have learnt from doing an essay on jehovah witnesses and the refusal of blood transfusions
Main Agents in Case
When evaluating any ethical case, it is crucial to examine all those involved and how their relationships with each other impact moral decisions made. In the case The Jehovah’s Witness and Blood Transfusion, all of the persons involved play an important role in determining what medical action should be taken based on ethical and moral deliberation. The first, and main, agent involved in the case is the patient herself, a 42 year old female who was recently baptized into the Jehovah’s Witness faith. Also highly involved, is the patent’s husband, who himself is not a member of Jehovah’s Witness, and is very unsure about his wife’s values in her faith and life decisions. In addition, there is a multidisciplinary team involved in the care of the patient, which consist of health care professionals such as physicians and nurses, and members of an ethics committee. The relationship between the patient and her husband is very important because typically, the health care team would look towards family members to be proxy decision makers when the patient is unable to be fully autonomous.
Main Ethical Dilemma
The main ethical dilemma in this case is for either the health care team to go against the patient’s religious beliefs and administer the blood transfusion to decrease the likelihood of her being permanently disabled, or for the health care team to comply with her religious beliefs in not administering a blood transfusion, causing the patient to remain permanently disabled. If the first decision is carried out, it may have negative effects in addition to the obvious positive ones of restoring her mobility and ability to speak. If the transfusion is provided, there poses a risk of the patient being rejected by othe...
... middle of paper ...
...A Code of Ethics. Retrieved from http://policybase.cma.ca/dbtw-wpd/PolicyPDF/PD04-06.pdf Day, R. A., Paul, P., Williams, B., Smeltzer, S. C., & Bare, B. (2010). Brunner & Suddarth’s textbook of Canadian medical-surgical nursing (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Janicemarie K. Vinicky, Matin L. Smith, Russell B. Connors, Jr., and Walter E Kozachuk, MD. “The Jehovah’s Witness and Blood: New Perspectives on an Old Dilemma,” The Journal of Clinical Ethics 1 (Spring 1991): 298-307.
Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania (2014). Jehovah’s Witness, common misconceptions. Retrieved from http://www.jw.org/en/jehovahs-witnesses/faq/jehovahs-witnesses-why-no-blood-transfusions/ Yeo, M., Moorhouse, A., Khan, P., and Rodney, P. (Eds.) (2010). Concepts and cases in nursing ethics (3rd Edition). Peterborough Ontario: Broadview Press. Print.
Josh Hardy of Virginia struggled with health issues throughout his young life. After his most recent bone marrow transplant in January 2014, he was unable to recover and lay hospitalized with an adenovirus. The rare experimental medicine is not available in hospitals like St. Jude which he is in. The life-saving medication is only carried by a specialized company called Chimerix. The drug Brincidofovir has not yet been released by the Food and Drug Administration to the public yet. Chimerix previously had a “compassionate care” program that enabled those in medical need to request Brincidofovir and they were granted with the drug, however Chimerix recently strayed away from this program and sought to take time and work on the development and advancement for the drug to be made publicly available. It will not be until approximately the year 2016 that the drug will be released on the market. The issue remains that a life threatening issue like Josh’s cannot wait two more years. Chimerix’s initial and later actions are key factors in determining whether the company follows the Benedictine faith, keeping their values correctly aligned in the light of Christian values. Chimerix’s was able to display the Benedictine principles in their company when they decided to grant Josh with the experimental drug, but their initial decision corrupted the morality of the company.
On the 1950’s, the above statement drove the medical field insane, many doctors used to forced blood transfusion on Jehovah’s Witness and other doctors refused to provide treatment to those who refuse blood transfusion; even in a life threatening situation. For some time, doctors were put on a bad position, they faced a dilemma when caring for a Jehovah’s Witness patient because if a patient (Jehovah’s Witness) was not treated promptly must likely he/she would die, but if they were threated against his or her wishes with blood transfusions, the doctor was charged with “Assault”. As the time went-on, the blood transfusion topic became more controversial, mainly due to the increase number on cases of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) acquired when used contaminated blood. The Scientifics, along with the medical field were forced to work together with Jehovah’s Witness in order to develo...
Hinkle, J., Cheever, K., & , (2012). Textbook of medical-surgical nursing. (13 ed., pp. 586-588). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health
Davis, A. J. (1997). Ethical dilemmas and nursing practice (4th ed.). Stamford, Conn.: Appleton & Lange.
The term nursing ethics means that the nurse has an obligation judge what is right and wrong in her or his duties as guided by the profession or the moral principles that govern the profession and as prescribed by the professional body. Nursing ethics initially encompassed virtues that were desired in a nurse. At the time, these virtues included physician loyalty, commitment to high moral character and obedience. Evolvement of nursing profession gradually made nurses embrace patients’ advocacy. As patient advocates, nurses work as part of an interdisciplinary team to provide patient care. Nursing ethics have kept pace with the advancement of the nursing profession to include a patient-centered focus, rather than a physician-centered focus.
Burkhardt, M. A., & Nathaniel, A. K. (2014). Ethics & issues in contemporary nursing (4th ed.). Stephan Helbra.
In critical and complicating medical cases, family members often find it tedious to decide as to what mode or procedure of treatment is idyllic for the recovery of their patient. In such cases, well-qualified and medically educated can play a pivotal role in deciding the kind of treatment that should be given to the patient to enhance its recovery. In a contrary situation a nurse may know that administering a particular drug may improve the patient’s condition, but may be refrained from conducting the required action due to doctor’s absence or non-permission. There are numerous cases through which ethical dilemmas in the profession of nursing can be discussed. Nurses in order to remain within the defined boundaries ...
In the world of health care there are multiple factors that affect the quality of treatment. One of the most debated subjects is religion. As all religious traditions tend to be complex and go for some length of time special care must be considered for the patient, family and care team. Through the years, the United States health care evolves with the changing demographics to develop an ethical treatment for Muslims in healthcare. Facing prejudices, Islam is highly debated within healthcare; however Islamic beliefs and traditions have been cooperative and manageable by healthcare providers.
Curlin, F. A., Lawrence, R. E., Chin, M. H. & Lantos, J. D. (2007). Religion, Conscience, and Controversial Clinical Practices. The New England Journal of Medicine, 356(6), 593-600. Retrieved February 19, 2011, from ProQuest Medical Library. (Document ID: 1212653521).
Davenport, Joan M., Stacy Estridge, and Dolores M. Zygmont. Medical-surgical nursing. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2008, 66-88.
Thompson, I. E., Melia, K. M., & Boyd, K. M. (2006). Nursing Ethics: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier.
Brunner, L.S. & Suddarth, D. S Textbook of Medical- Surgical Nursing, 1988 6th ed. J. B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia
According to the harm principle, we may restrict the freedom of other people to act if the restriction is necessary to prevent harm to others (pp.903). I agree, in such cases provided in the text (chemotherapy and blood transfusions), that medical intervention must be administered against a parent’s better judgment in life threatening situations. Too many times, the parents’ choice to refuse certain therapies results in more harm to the child than the actual therapy. One can argue that the risks and trials that accompany some therapies are much worse than the benefits achieved. I will argue that, although the pain might be hard to deal with, temporary pain is better than permanent loss. It is better to be able to pray and practice your religion during the life-saving treatments than to sit and mourn and regret not making the decision to attempt to save your child.
Another huge ethical topic is the patient’s right to choose autonomy in the refusal of life-saving medicine or treatment. This issue affects a nurse’s standards of care and code of ethics. “The nurse owes the patient a duty of care and must act in accordance with this duty at all times, by respecting and supporting the patient’s right to accept or decline treatment” (Volinsky). In order for a patient to be able make these types of decisions they must first be deemed competent. While the choice of patient’s to refuse life-saving treatment may go against nursing ethical codes and beliefs to attempt and coerce them to get treatment is trespass and would conclude in legal action. “….then refusal of these interventions may be regarded as inappropriate, but in the case of a patient with capacity, the patient must have the ultimate authority to decide” (Volinsky). While my values of the worth of life and importance of action may be different than others, as a nurse I have to learn to set that aside and follow all codes of ethics whether I have a dilemma with them or not. Sometimes with ethics there is no right or wrong, but as a nurse we have to figure out where to draw the line in some cases.
In view of the rising costs of blood, the hospital tried to have sensible discussions with Red Cross and their answer was quite simple and disappointing and that was, for the hospital to get other blood suppliers if it simply didn’t like their prices. Carolinas Healthcare System was not the first to get such a blatant answer and neither was it to be the last. The hospital understood that though the Red Cross had their headquarters in Charlotte, and a national blood testing lab, decisions were not made from within but from St Louis. Based on this, they would not be expecting any considerable action as St. Lois never showed any interest in solving Carolina’s