Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: porter's five forces
Managers and strategists are often faced with a dilemma while trying to understand the determinants of profitability of industries they compete in as well as potential industries they may wish to compete. To this effect, several analytical frameworks are employed; the most widely used being the Porter’s Six Forces model. This paper seeks to bring to light the shortcomings of using the Porter’s Six Forces model as an analytical framework to determine which industries are profitable or not. Until the introduction of a “sixth force” in the mid-nineties, the “Porter’s Five Forces Model” as it was originally developed by Michael E. Porter in 1979 explained how “five competitive forces” determine industry attractiveness. Porter opined that in the fight to sustain long-term profitability, a firm must be strategic towards competition, and beyond competition, keep tabs on a broader set of competitive forces; customers who can drive prices down, suppliers who exercise some level of power, new entrants who might come in to compete for profits and substitute products and services that essentially place constraints on the profitability and growth on any industry. With the extension of this model, the sixth force (as shown in exhibit 1) included showed the impact of complimentary products and services on the attractiveness and overall profitability of an industry. In general, the Six Forces model proposes that the underlying structural drivers of any industry determine the performance of the players. To buttress the implication of the model, Porter explained why the airline industry is the least profitable amongst industries owing to the high threat of the competitive forces. The airline industry players compete heavily on price. Most custom... ... middle of paper ... ...012/12/12/us-india-walmart-probe-idUSBRE8BB0A120121212. Last assessed 02/05/2014. • Rumelt, R.P., “How Much Does Industry Matter?” Strategic Management Journal 12 (1991): 167–185. See also Mauri, A. J., Mauri & Michaels, M.P., “Firm and Industry Effects Within Strategic Management: An Empirical Examination,” Strategic Management Journal 19 (1998): 211–219 • Shearman & Sterling LLP: Elevators and Escalators. Available: http://www.carteldigest.com/cartel-detail-page.cfm?itemID=7. Last assessed 02/05/2014. • Wickham, P.A. (2006), Strategic Entrepreneurship, 4 ed, Prentice Hall. • Y. Li and S. Deng, “ A methodology for Competitive Advantage Anaylsis and Strategy Formulation: An Example in a Transitional Economy, European Journal of Operational Research 118 (1999), 259-270. • Yoffie D.B., & Kim K., Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010, Harvard Business School, 2011
The 5-Force Industry Analysis first introduced by Michel Porter, Harvard Business School professor, a quarter-century ago. This theory examines the suppliers, buyers, product substitutes, existing firms’ rivalry and new entrants in a firm’s product market.
Porter’s Five Forces Model is a widely used tool by strategists to develop a competitive analysis, from which they will be able to develop strategies (David, 2013). When looking at Delta, it would be beneficial to look at the external forces this will help top management develop strategies to combat external factors, threats from external factors could potentially harm Delta. According to Porter, the nature of competitiveness in a given industry can be viewed as a composite of five forces: 1) Rivalry among competing firms, 2) Potential development of new competitors, 3) Potential development of substitute products, 4) Bargaining power of suppliers, 5) Bargaining power of
Porter has identified five competitive forces that shape every industry and every market. These forces determine the intensity of competition and hence the profitability and attractiveness of an industry. The objective of corporate strategy should be to modify these competitive forces in a way that improves the position of the organization. Porters model supports analysis of the driving forces in an industry. Based on the information derived from the Five Forces Analysis, management can decide how to influence or to exploit particular characteristics of their industry.
There are two reasons why a firm may perform well in an industry, either 1) the industry is attractive to any firm 2) the firm is better and outperforms it’s rivals. Porter’s theory therefore can be used to discover the markets that are attractive to firms or, in those which aren’t breaking down the five forces so a strategy for success can be developed. In general the firm with be more profitable if each of the forces is low, that is to say there is a low threat of new firms entering, if buyers and suppliers have little power over the firm, if there is a low threat from substitute products and if competitive rivalry is low.
As strategy consultants of McCormick & Associates, we use Porters Five Forces Model as a framework when making a qualitative evaluation of a firm's strategic position (Appendix 1.2). These five forces determine the competitive intensity and therefore attractiveness of a market. These forces affect the ability of a company to serve its customers and make a profit. A change in any of the forces normally requires a company to re-assess the market place.
For assessing the industry profitability, Porter 5 Forces analysis tools were used to analyze one organization evaluation. In this case, the technique were used to analyze 7-Eleven Convenience Store specifically in Malaysia. Porter 5 Forces consists of 5 important area which is Threat of New Entrants, Bargaining Power of customers, Threat of substitute Products and services, Bargaining Power of suppliers, and competitive rivalry within the industry. Theoretically, the more powerful these forces in an industry, the lower its profit potential. The strength of each force differs by industry and changes over time. The competitive advantage that 7-Eleven has using these five forces is it has raised the barrier of entry for other competitors to enter the convenience store market as new competitors will require a huge capital investment in order to implement the information technology in their business in order to be competitive. Also, hypothetically being the first in the market, 7-Eleven could have made contracts with the Malaysia government to not allow other 24-hour convenience stores in the market for a certain time period, such as Astro had done, thus having a monopoly market in the beginning of their operations which will allow them to target a bigger market share.
Lufthansa, one of the world’s biggest airliners, has divisions handing maintenance, catering and air cargo. Since the World War II the airline industry has never earned its cost of capital over the business cycle (Hitt, 2010). Most of the airline companies have either filed for bankruptcy or are being bailed out by their government. Lufthansa had also gone through these tough times, but had resurfaced to become one of the worlds most profitable airline company. The company adapted a transnational strategy, seeking to achieve both global efficiency and local responsiveness. Lufthansa’s monopoly in Germany came to a halt with the creating of the European Union. All the EU member countries become one regional and therefore the European competition became, an increasingly a local competition. Lufthansa created its regional Hubs, to cater for its domestic market. But the availability of substitutes such as bullet trains and the Euro tunnel, made is necessary for Lufthansa to create short traveling time, customizations and quality standards in the region to achieve a competitive advantage. But outside the EU there are no substitute to air travels as such all the flag carriers are competing in the market, the international airline industry is a highly competitive environment. A new force has also emerged in the world of air travel, in the form of three Gulf airlines with jumbo ambitions. Within a decade Dubai’s Emirates, Qatar Airways and Eithad from Abu Dhabi have between them carried the capacity of two hundred million passengers (Micheal, 2010). The company had to go global and therefore adopted the international corporate-level strategy, where Lufthansa will ope...
Porter's five forces analysis is an industry analysis model developed by Michael E. Porter as a tool for developing business strategies to become or stay competitive in an industry or marketplace as per (Braze, 2013).
Author , Craig S.Fleisher ,Babette E. Benhoussen (2007).Business and Competitive Analysis: Effective Application of new and classic methods Available from http://www.iseg.utl.pt/aula/cad1505/chapter6.pdf (Figure4:The Nine Forces)
Porter 5 forces analysis is a framework for business management developed by Michael Porter in 1979. It uses concepts developed in Industrial Organization economics to derive 5 forces that determine the attractiveness of a market. It is also known as FFF, Fullerton's Five Forces. Porter referred to these forces as the microenvironment, to contrast it with the more general term macro-environment. They consist of those forces close to a company that affect its ability to serve its customers and make a profit. A change in any of the forces normally requires a company to re-assess the marketplace. The first force is called bargaining power of customers, the second is the bargaining power of suppliers, the third on is the threat of new entrants, the fourth one is the threat of substitute products, all in which influence the fifth force, the level of competition in an industry.
Air travel began in the early 1900s and scheduled flights started in the 1920s (Harris). In the early years, the airline industry competition was nonexistent. The competitive environment changed dramatically over the course of the last century specifically when the industry underwent regulation and then deregulation. The future success of the airline industry depends on the ability to adapt with rapidly changing industry environmental factors.
Porter 's Five Forces model, it named after Michael E. Porter. He identifies and analyzes five competitive forces that structure every industry, helps to determine an industry 's weaknesses and strengths. There are five components of Porter 's five forces model
Because the subject matter of strategic management is so inherently complex and because each one of us brings his own personal biases to the analysis, it was suggested early on that virtually all case material in the field be analyzed from the perspective of more than one methodology. Profit theory and industrial chains were selected as the first of a number of viable approaches to the analytical process. It would have been equally correct to select the Five Competitive Forces analysis refined by Michael Porter, one of the major figures in the field of strategic management. This methodology addresses the same issues but differs only in the language that they use to describe corporate behavior. The five forces are:
Porter’s five forces is a framework for analyzing an industry and business strategy development. It looks at forces that determine the competitive intensity of an industry and hence the overall attractiveness of that industry. The configuration of the five forces differs by industry. Understanding the competitive forces and their underlying causes reveals the roots of an industry’s current profitability while providing a framework for anticipating and influencing competition over time.
The Porter five forces model (see Appendix 1) as an external analysis tool was established by Michael E. Porter and firstly announced in his book “Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors” in 1980 . The main idea of the Porter five forces concept is that the attractiveness of a market depends on the characteristic of the five competitive forces that have an impact on a company (see Appendix 2).