Legal Case Study

1582 Words4 Pages

Introduction

Tins must be advised with information that will enlighten her to her options but first we must understand facts and the issues in the case, then information about the legal issues will be presented and then the determination of whether Tina has suffered actual loss or damages and also depict other possible actions that she can take and then a summary describing all of her actions that she can take.

Case

In Tina’s case the relevant information is;

• Tina is looking to buy a house and asks Simon about the safety of the garage, Simon says “don’t worry about that. It’s perfectly safe and sound. I’m a building surveyor and I should know”.

• Tina relies on this and says “Oh well, that’s right then“ and after a further inspection of the house, Tin agrees to buy and tells Simon to draw up the contract.

• A contract is created which contains no warranties in respect of the garage.

• Tina signs he contract after discussing the matter with her solicitors.

• After settlement the garage blows over during a storm.

Now that the information and facts are presented in order or sequence, we can now analyse it and determine if Tina has a chance to sue for a breach in contract and if not, if there are other ways for getting compensation for the damage caused to the garage.

Fraudulent Misrepresentation

Fraudulent Misrepresentation is distinguished from innocent misrepresentation by the intentional deceit of one party by the other (Andy Gibson and Douglas Fraser, 2007, pg 325). The following elements must be established in order to amount to a fraudulent misrepresentation;

• There must be a false statement of fact, not opinion, unless the person making the statement did not hold that opinion,

• The representation must be untrue,

• The person making the representation must know that it is false, or not believe in its truth, or be recklessly careless,

• The representation must be made with the intention that the other party acts in reliance to it,

• The statement must actually deceive the innocent party, i.e. be acted upon, and

• The innocent party must have suffered some loss.

Because a contract induced by fraud is voidable at the opinion of the deceived party, it remains binding until set aside (Andy Gibson and Douglas Fraser, 2007, pg 325). Thus, the position of the deceived party is as follows;

• Since fraud is a tort, in addition to any other remedy available to the deceived party, damages may be recoverable in an action of deceit.

More about Legal Case Study

Open Document