Learning Curve
Thought provoking and startling, the movie “Learning Curve” awakened in us, as viewers, the uncomfortable reality of where our society and the educational system as a whole are clearly at odds. Mr. Walmsley was hired to substitute at an inner city high school where the same problems that we find today in many schools were brought to an unbelievable level of surreal chaos. The same problems that we witness everyday in our schools were present in this movie, but with an intensity and boldness that would shake the foundation of most well-meaning educators. Problems of student apathy, lack of parental involvement and teacher support, as well as financial constraints plagued this inner city school in much the same way that it does our own schools. However, Mr. Walmsley chose to demand respect and prove to the students that not only was he of value and worthy of their respect, but they should place higher value on themselves as well as others. He demonstrated in a succinct way that learning would take place even at the expense of traditional methods of teaching.
As a substitute, Mr. Walmsley was greeted by students who were disrespectful and had apparently no motivation to learn. Students sat on the desks, spoke out in class as if they were attending a social gathering and used bad language in most every conversation. In addition, the teachers in this high school were so tightly controlled by financial constraints as well as restrictions placed on them by their school board that they were only a hindrance to anyone with the vision of making a difference in the lives of these students.
One of Mr. Walmsley’s first student-teacher interactions came early in the movie with a young man who had been bullied and abused b...
... middle of paper ...
...thus effecting them all. The pressure to conform was great. Theorist Lev Vgotsky’s studies would support the idea that Mr. Walmsley’s use of group reward and punishment helped to further the cooperative learning that the students began developing to live successfully in their environment (site).
While Mr. Walmsley’s intentions and the principles in which they were founded may be justifiable, his methods of application and instruction were not. He was clear and concise in his expectations of the students, as well as consistent in his treatment of them. They were given rewards, but they were basic needs which should be allowed to every human not only to those who perform in a required manner.
Works Cited
Thompson, Ph.D., Martina M. "Introduction to Learning Theories." Learning Theory and
Instruction Class. Baker University, Topeka. 10 May 2010. Lecture.
The teachers in Voc. Ed. were not capable of teaching well and did not believe in the abilities of their students. Rose’s homeroom teacher, Brother Dill, physically harmed his students by either shaking or smacking them to keep control in the classroom. Furthermore, the author soon deduced that the entire program was intended to be “a dumping ground for the disaffected” due to the lack of enthusiasm or
Benton uses the article to persuade educators and professors not to give up on the students and to try to protect those students that do want to learn: “I have become convinced that professors -- particularly the ones with tenure -- need to find ways to give remedial attention to student behavior, just as they have long done for students who cannot read or write well enough to succeed at college.” Furthermore, the article evaluates the problems and gets to the real cause of the lack of care and
Rose, starting his first day of high school, was placed by an administrative error in the vocational track, due to the results of another student with his same last name. This mistake or error went unnoticed over the first year of his school. His classes were all dead end. The author encountered many terrible teachers in charge of this remedial track; most of these educators were paranoid, abusive, racist, and unprepared. Classes did not provide a suitable learning environment for him and his classmate, who needed
...lms these students get away with murder and still go on to college. This simply does not happen in real life; therefore, looking to Hollywood films for the true colors of schools is not in the best of interests. We have to realize that directors produce these films in their vision of American culture. We as Americans always look to the American Dream of sometime “making it.” The films neglect to see the loser’s point of view, meaning Hollywood films only look to a positive ending because it is in our nature to believe in the American Dream. This book allows our society to actually look past the films fantasies and observe the true inequalities in school. Although Hollywood films do correctly show how urban, suburban, and private students behave in schools, they do not show the true outcomes of real life.
Teachers have become gateway keepers to providing education to students. Over the span several years, teachers have been criticized with being unprepared, unable to adapt to different learning styles, and are increasing the number of students who aren’t learning. With this achievement gap increasing, it brings up the idea of what is the education system doing wrong and what improvements does it need tending to. The education system needs to be redesigned to strengthen its curriculum, it’s connection to both practice and theory, and the idea of a powerful educator. The first aspect of this memo contains an interview with Diana Regalado De Santiago, a math teacher in the Socorro Independent School District for the past six years. The second part of this memo contains a rhetorical analysis on a journal article written by Linda Darling-Hammond.
Is education wasted on low income families? Are housing projects and ghettos nothing except undying monsters for taxpayers to fight? According to society, maybe. According to Principal Clark, no. Not only does he believe in his students, but he forces them to believe in themselves. Joe Clark makes very compelling appeals to the three rhetorical devices, pathos, ethos and, logos. Joe Clark was an excellent principal in all areas, this idea is further proven by the speech he gave his students before their skills test.
When it comes to education, it is about helping people discover, refine, and develop their gifts, talents, passions and abilities; and then helping them discover how to use those gifts, talents, abilities in ways that benefit others and oneself (Bull, 2015). However, with education, there are many places where this does not happen and learners may fall between the cracks. Schools are heavily measured on testing, student outcomes and student numbers that it has become the main focus to excel the school district—but what about the students? I recall a time where I was sitting in a classroom and the teacher was going over a math lesson. Many students struggled and were having a difficult time following along with the task. The teacher started
In many low income communities, there are teachers that are careless and provide their students with poor quality education. These teachers are there just to make sure that they keep receiving their monthly paychecks and act in this way because they believe that low income students do not have the drive, the passion, or the potential to be able to make something of themselves and one day be in a better place than they are now. Anyon reveals that in working class schools student’s “Work is often evaluated not according to whether it is right or wrong but according to whether the children followed the right steps.” (3). This is important because it demonstrates that low income students are being taught in a very basic way. These children are being negatively affected by this because if they are always being taught in this way then they will never be challenged academically, which can play a huge role in their futures. This argument can also be seen in other articles. In the New York Times
“I get paid whether you learn or not.” One might ask who formed this insensible vocalization; the answer encompasses, or lies within the various teachers who have given up or do not care about their students anymore. These are the inadequate educators, the student body as a whole seemingly dreads receiving. Furthermore, they are among the several determining factors, according to the film, Waiting for Superman, as to the complexity of education issues and why schools are performing poorly. Davis Guggenheim, an Oscar winning filmmaker, “undertakes an exhaustive review of public education, surveying “drop-out factories’ and ‘academic sinkholes’” in this film in order to not only learn the issues, but to also offer suggestions (Guggenheim,
Practice is an essential component of the development of expertise. Despite the necessity for practice, ethical and practical tensions may arise as a result of it. These tensions are shown throughout the articles, “The Learning Curve” by Atul Gawande and “The Great Forgetting” by Nicholas Carr. Gawande focuses how surgeons have to practice on patients which can sometimes be considered unethical. On the other hand, Carr focuses on how dependence on technology can be detrimental, especially in the aviation industry. In both of these passages, the authors present arguments explaining how practice can lead to several mistakes as well as the loss of numerous lives. However, practice is needed in order to achieve expertise which leads to an ethical
Reading Mike Rose’s book Lives on the Boundary one can benefit from his efforts as a student and educator. It is a tool that can be used to motivate teachers to produce interesting lesson plans and to be aware of their students in all aspects. The book provides concrete examples of good and bad teaching all related through the author’s personal history. Finally, the book-as an account of one man’s personal struggle – reflects on the inner psyche of the marginal student and prompts the reader to be more attentive to each and every learner.
Sadker, D.M., Sadker, M.P., and Zittleman, K.R.,(2008) Teachers, Students, and Society (8th ed.).New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Wattenberg’s common interest in deviant juveniles and group behavior, led to his work, Mental Hygiene in Teaching (1951), co-authored with Fritz Redl. Their research and knowledge allowed them to provide insights into psychological and social aspects that affect student behavior in the classroom. They became among the first to present teachers with specific disciplinary techniques, which could be used on a daily basis, intended to uphold ...
There are different methods of teaching, in addition to cooperative, such as competitive and individualistic. In competitive learning, students are graded on a curve, which means they have to work against each other and try to work faster and more accurately than their fellow students. In individualistic learning, students work towards goals that are separate from their peers. When working on their own, they can work on their own pace, and work for their own set of goals. (Johnson 104). When using cooperative learning, it includes characteristics of both individualistic and competitive learning. In order for a cooperative learning environment to be most effective, there needs to be group rewards along with individual accountability. When each individual succeeds in their group, the group is rewarded; this prevents certain students from dominating the work. There are different methods for cooperative learning that incorporate individual and group rewards. One such method is Student Teams– Achievement Divisions (STAD). With motivation to win, the groups compete ag...
Fischman, Wendy, Jennifer A Dibara and Howard Gardner. "Creating good education against the odds."Cambridge Journal of Education, 36. 3 (2006): 383--398. Print.