Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Factors to consider in taking leadership style
Different leadership styles comparison
Different leadership styles comparison
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Factors to consider in taking leadership style
Leadership Essay, A.P.A 1000 word essay
The leadership style combination between autocratic leadership and empowerment leadership would give the futuristic cutting edge per se, to create a diversified ultimate decision making policy. Autocratic leadership, which is a style that leaders who make decisions on their own without consulting employees enjoy and empowerment, which is a practice in which managers lead employees by sharing power, responsibility, and decision making with them (Boone, L. E., & Kurtz, D. L. 2009 p. 260-270). This mixture creates responsibility and accountability. If the leader is made to lead then, in return they will make certain key decisions based on experience, proven results and a “pocket” of advisors that will guide them based on their on comprehension of the field along the way. This creates a “hierarchy” which is necessary to let the employees who are coming up on the ladder to have a cause and effect “history” so to speak, for many different common and uncommon situations to use in the future.
In one’s opinion, when one combines these two leadership styles, in common and uncommon situations, one may see higher productivity and overall accountability within employers and employees – giving the workers a sense of self-respect within the company and experience to handle issues on their own as well as, the ability to be noticed in leadership aspects. However, one also must realize there are just as much cons to autocratic and empowerment leadership styles. Autocratic leadership’s cons involve incompetent feedback; plus, many feel these types of leaders shouldn’t be followed but used as an extreme measure to keep a business that is falling, in place (autocratic leadership). Perhaps seeing the cons of ...
... middle of paper ...
...and employees. This also includes, but, is not limited to, a great leadership in which held their company no matter size or strength through the dirt with the knowledge of where it was heading.
Resch 3
References
Amble, B. (n.d.). Empowering leadership not always the answer. Management Advice, News and Opinion. Retrieved July 27, 2010, from http://www.management-issues.com/2006/10/16/research/empowering-leadership-not-always-the-answer.asp
Autocratic Leadership. (n.d.). Careers, Finance and Investing : Money-zine.com. Retrieved July 27, 2010, from http://www.money-zine.com/Career-Development/Leadership-Skill/Autocratic-Leadership/
Boone, L. E., & Kurtz, D. L. (2009). Contemporary Business (13 ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
autocratic leadership. (n.a.) (n.d.). spiritwatch.org. Retrieved July 27, 2010, from www.spiritwatch.org/order.gif
The leaders take full authority and assume full responsibility. Autocratic leadership typically is negative, based on threats and punishment, but it can appear to be positive, as demonstrated by the benevolent autocrat who chooses to give some rewards to employees. Consultative leaders approach one or more employees and ask them for inputs prior to making a decision. These leaders may then choose to use or ignore the information and advice received, however.
Ellen Kullman, shares a mixed background. Though born in Turkey and raised in Italy, her parents are both of Jewish Iranian descent. However she grew up there since the age of five as a permanent resident who never became Italian. She further traveled to the United States on a student visa, a work visa, obtained her green card, and finally became a U.S. citizen. She holds a bachelor of sciences degree in mechanical engineering from Tufts University and a master’s degree in management from Kellog/University. Here is how she reached the top: a Sales Rep at Westinghouse where she discovered her passion for business and a Management Trainee at General Electric. She joined DuPont as a Marketing Manager in 1988 where she quickly moved up the corporate ladder and ultimately became the first female CEO of the 210 year old organization in January 1, 2009. Away from work, she married and had three children. Ms. Kullman travels the world to promote face to face relationships with her enormous corporate team but believes her own family is the most important. She is the 19th executive to lead the company founded in 1802. Prior to becoming CEO, Ms. Kullman was president of the company from Oct. 1 through Dec. 31, 2008. In 2012, Ms. Kullman was ranked at number five in Fortune’s list of Most Powerful Women. Though DuPont is known for its dominance in chemicals, since becoming CEO Ms. Kullman has pushed the 210 year old company into unexpected new businesses (World of CEOs Dossiers, 2012).
Because the production level of the mill was low when the new plant manager arrived, it is no surprise that a quick change in the type of management—to autocratic—quickly pushed all employees to raise production. However, it is likely that the style of leadership has taken its toll on every level of management in the mill, and that is why we’ve seen a drop in production in the last 18 months. Autocratic leadership is a rigid form of management and if any tasks are delegated, they are done so in a very specific way. But, generally, autocratic leaders are not known to delegate tasks effectively and high levels of management are usually the only people with any sort of authority. Empowerment, as discussed in the
Encarta Dictionary within Microsoft Word defines leadership as,” the ability to guide, direct, or influence people.” Expanding upon that definition, my personal definition is influencing people to follow to achieve a goal, regardless of how unpleasant. Leadership is not something that happens overnight, it needs to be cultivated over time. During that process, it is necessary to identify delinquencies and make adjustments. Reviewing the feedback provided by my LPI/360 assessment, the three areas identified I need to improve on are, praising people for a job well done, actively listening to diverse points of view, and becoming more visible within the workplace.
Autocratic II (A2). The leader takes a decision based on the information that is requested from the team members. This differs from the above type of leadership in the only aspect that the leader doesn’t have all the necessary information to arrive at a decision and requests the same from the team members.
Lawrence, A. T., & Weber, J. (2014). Business and Society (14thth ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies Inc
A true leader will empower their employees. Empowerment can be achieved when a manager creates an atmosphere of meani...
From the research done by prominent studies, we can see that all the aforementioned opinions they have on empowerment are valid. However, none of these opinions considered the likelihood that self-determined and motivated employees may overpower managements’ authority as they tend to believe highly of themselves. This could, rather than boosting productivity, lead to tension among workers and retardation in job performance.
In the past people believed that leaders are born not made. Now the definition of leadership has been changed because now we believe that leaders can be made through education. Leadership plays important part in every field and organization to achieve higher goal. According to Kelly, “leadership is a process of influence in which the leader influences others toward goal achievement” (Kelly & Crawford, 2013, p. 168). Nowadays there are many leadership theories and have different perspective and suggestion. I have chosen two theories to discuss in this paper that is Autocratic leadership theory the Transformational leadership theory. Both theories are total contradictory with each other because both have a different perspective.
Leadership is the glue that binds any business together, identifying and understanding your type of leadership style can ultimately aid you in becoming a better leader in your professional career. A successful business cannot function without leadership therefore this is a crucial aspect of internal employee development for businesses striving to stay relevant in a crowded marketplace. In addition to recognizing your leadership style every leader needs to look to them and identify what type of personality they have. By becoming an informed business leader you will gain trust and respect of your team to guide them into the future and maximizing potential growth. Throughout this paper I will identify my leadership style and also personality type and how it has affected my personal career growth. Identifying these conclusions is extremely important in crafting company culture.
Kotter, J. (2013) ‘Management is still not leadership [online], available: http//blogs.hbr.org/kotter/2013/01/management-is-still-not-leadership.html [accessed 10 March 2013]
There are a few different types of well known leadership styles, authoritarian, delegative, and democratic. To assess my leadership style I used two online tests to help me determine my style. I felt the results were accurate and I fall into a democratic style/participative style. If I am leading I prefer to include the group and get their feedback on solving issues. However, I still make the final decision after listening to the thoughts of the group on a particular topic. This is considered to be a positive style of leadership that is inspiring to the group involved. The leaders decision making tends to be more accurate due to the input of other experts. (Cite)
According to Manion (2014), a leader is a person who is able to positively influence a group of people and develop their ability to accomplish a goal (Manion, 2014). According to this definition of leadership, it suggests that every individual has a likely chance to become a leader. Every time one voices an opinion or an idea, they influence others in some form of way, therefore, they function as a role of a leader. Lewin, Lippitt and White (1939) suggest that there are three types of leaders: authoritarian, democratic and laissez-faire (Lewin, Lippitt, & White, 1939). Authoritarian, or autocratic leadership, is a leader that dictates all the decisions within a group of individuals (Lewin et al., 1939). On the other hand, the Laissez-faire leader allows the group members complete freedom without the leader’s participation in any of the decisions (Lewin et al., 1939). The type of leader I aspire to be is the
Employee empowerment can be a powerful tool. The leadership style can increase efficiency and effectiveness inside an organization. Empowerment can also increase productivity and allow managers more tim...
Team leaders perform actions to get results from their team work and try to eliminate all the future risks and threats to their team unity and organization. They join hands rather than compete for achievements. But, solo autocratic leaders test and evaluate their follower’s determination and followership through giving them more risks and competition. They take radical measures to achieve and bring change.