Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Mexican independence from Spain
Essay of the mexican revolution during 1910
Spain world history flashcards
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Mexican independence from Spain
El propósito de este ensayo es analizar la Constitución Mexicana de 1824 como una consecuencia de la constitución de Cádiz, promulgada en España en 1812. Para esto, el escrito empieza con puntualizar el contexto histórico de España al momento de la divulgación de su Constitución, y prosigue hasta mencionar al grupo de los criollos en el virreinato de Nueva España. Se analiza la incursión militar francesa al territorio español, así como las ideas liberales que surgen como reacción ante la institución forzada de un monarca extranjero. En lo que concierne a América, se discuten la participación de delegados en las Cortes de Cádiz, así como la adaptación del modelo de provincias y cabildos al territorio de Nueva España. La teoría del texto concluye con hacer referencia a instancias donde se tomaron artículos de la Constitución de 1812 para formular los tratados liberales de la Constitución de Apatzingán y finalmente de la Constitución de 1824, la primera que se proclamó en el México independiente. La mayoría de las fuentes utilizadas fueron trabajos de investigación producidos por autores independientes o con afiliaciones a establecimientos educativos, como la Universidad Autónoma de México. Muchas de las citas textuales provienen de testimonios calcados que ofrecen estos historiadores como parte de sus antologías; aunque también se consultaron trabajos cuyo propósito es archivar llanamente cartas u otros documentos históricos.
La invasión francesa a España
La famosa Constitución fue promulgada en el año de 1812, cuando las fuerzas patriotas de España se replegaron a Cádiz tras la conquista de Andalucía en 1810. Publicada cuatro años después del dos de mayo de 1808, cuando José Bonaparte asumió el poder de España en lugar del úl...
... middle of paper ...
...1, 2013, from Books.google.com.mx: http://books.google.com.mx/books?id=ZW7LLb3BGAoC&pg=PA144&lpg=PA144&dq=La+Guerra+de+la+Independencia+(1808-1814):++el+pueblo+espa%C3%B1ol,+su+ej%C3%A9rcito+y+sus+aliados+frente+a+la+ocupaci%C3%B3n+napole%C3%B3nica&source=bl&ots=dgl4zcGPic&sig=5LXelVGF95Ro-a9WVWC--8qVQZQ&hl=en&sa=X&ei=fQR7UrLWNIjekQePiIDoCw&ved=0CDEQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false
7. SÁNCHEZ-ARCILLA BERNAL, J. (n.d.). La Aportación de los Diputados de la Nueva España a las Cortes de Cádiz: Mariano Mendiola. Retrieved Noviembre 11, 2013, from Biblio.jurídicas.unam.com.mx: http://biblio.juridicas.unam.mx/libros/2/722/24.pdf
8. Sociedad Estatal de Conmemoraciones Culturales. (2008). España, 1808-1814. La nación en armas . Retrieved Noviembre 11, 2013, from Esmadrid.com: http://www.esmadrid.com/recursosinstitucionales/CCVilla/agenda/documentos/1917781850_132200812231.pdf
Anais Nin once said that “we write to taste life twice: in the moment and in retrospection.” In his book, Seven Myths of Spanish Conquest, Matthew Restall tries to change our perception of the past in other to open our eyes to what life was really like during the colonial period. As Restall puts it, the main propose of the book is to “illustrate the degree to which the Conquest was a far more complex and protracted affair” (p.154) than what was supposed in the latters and chronicles left by the conquistadores. Each one of Restall’s chapters examines one of seven myths regarding the mystery behind the conquest. By doing so, Matthew Restall forces us to look back at the Spanish conquest and question
Models for post-revolutionary Latin American government are born of the complex economic and social realities of 17th and 18th century Europe. From the momentum of the Enlightenment came major political rebellions of the elite class against entrenched national monarchies and systems of power. Within this time period of elitist revolt and intensive political restructuring, the fundamental basis for both liberal and conservative ideology was driven deep into Latin American soil. However, as neither ideology sought to fulfill or even recognize the needs or rights of mestizo people under government rule, the initial liberal doctrine pervading Latin American nations perpetuated racism and economic exploitation, and paved the way for all-consuming, cultural wars in the centuries to come.
One question posed by the authors is “How did Columbus’s relationship with the Spanish crown change over time, and why?” In simple terms, Columbus’s relationship with the
C. W. Hackett, ed., Historical Documents relating to New Mexico, Nueva Vizcaya, and Approaches Thereto, to 1773, vol. III (Washington: Carnegie Institution of Washington, 1937), 327-35.
For four hundred years Spain ruled over an immense and profitable global empire that included islands in the Caribbean, Americas, Puerto Rico, and Cuba. After the Napoleonic Wars (1808-1815) many of Spain’s colonies followed the US’s lead, fighting and winning their independence. These revolts, coupled with other nations chipping away at Spain’s interests, dwindled Spain’s former Empire. By 1860, only Cuba and Puerto Rico were what remained of Spain’s former Empire. Following the lead of other former Spanish colonies, Cuban fighters started their campaign for independence, known as the Ten year war (1868-1878). This war developed into a Cuban insurgency which fought a guerilla war against the Spanish occupation.2
Milanich, Jerald T. and Susan Milbrath., ed. First Encounters: Spanish Exploration in the Caribbean and the United States1492-1570. Gainesville: U of Florida P, 1989.
Comment on the consequences for the United States with regard to the statement made by Eric Foner in the text, “Thus, two principles central to American freedom since the War of Independence – no taxation without representation and government based on the consent of the governed – were abandoned when it came to the nation’s new possessions. The struggle of Cuba to gain its independence from Spain, which began in 1895, has captured the attention of many Americans. Spain’s brutal repressive measures to halt the rebellion were graphically portrayed to the U.S. public by American newspaper publishers, William Randolph Hearst and Joseph Pulitzer. This caused the national mood to shift. Hearst and Pulitzer exaggerated the actual events in Cuba and how the Spanish brutally treated their prisoners by adding sensational words to catch the emotions of readers.
Bartolomé de Las Casas was born in 1484 AD in Seville and died in 1566 in Madrid. In the ending of the 15th century and the beginning of 16th, he came to America and become a “protector of Indian”. In 1542, most based on his effort, Spain has passed the New Law, which prohibit slaving Indians (Foner, p. 7). In 1552, he published the book A Short Account of the Destruction of The Indies.
Bartolomé de Las Casas begins by providing a vivid description of each land being invaded by the Europeans and the type of peopl...
...seized this opportunity to claim independence and by the time Spain had overthrown Joseph Bonaparte in 1813, the majority of their former colonies had all gained autonomy. However, once the Spanish American colonies had gained independence, they all failed to unite leading to a reduction in inter-colonial trade and each area went their separate ways leading to economic, social and political problems within these countries.
“The Conquest of New Spain” is the first hand account of Bernal Diaz (translated by J.M. Cohen) who writes about his personal accounts of the conquest of Mexico by himself and other conquistadors beginning in 1517. Unlike other authors who wrote about their first hand accounts, Diaz offers a more positive outlook of the conquest and the conquistadors motives as they moved through mainland Mexico. The beginning chapters go into detail about the expeditions of some Spanish conquistadors such as Francisco Hernandez de Cordoba, Juan de Grijalva and Hernando Cotes. This book, though, focuses mainly on Diaz’s travels with Hernando Cortes. Bernal Diaz’s uses the idea of the “Just War Theory” as his argument for why the conquests were justifiable
In order to understand the effects of the Spanish Civil War, the atmosphere of Spain prior to 1936 needs to be understood as well. Spain, unlike major European powers, never experienced a bourgeois revolution and was therefore still dominated by a significant aristocracy. However, Spain had gone through several civil wars and revolutions making violence one of the most common devices for change. It, also, had undergone several cycles of reform, reaction from the opposition, and reversal by military uprising led by a dictator before 1936 (Preston 18).
THESIS : “ The United States didn’t want to get involved in the Spanish-American War, but was dragged into it due to yellow journalism, they wanted to control the seas, and wanted complete control over Cuba.”
Rock, D. (1987). Argentina, 1516-1987: From Spanish Colonization to Alphonsín. Berkley: University of California Press.
Spain was once of the powerful nations in Europe. However, by the 20th century it was poor and backwards country where corruption was experienced on a commonly basis. After losing its overseas possessions Cuba, Guam, Puerto Rico and Philippines during the Spanish-American War Spain was in a state of political tension due extreme measures of wealth, poverty and clearly social tensions. Essentially Spain was a deeply divided country during this time although it was a constitutional monarchy during 1920. During this year King Alfonso XIII remained as the royal figurehead however, Miguel Primo de Rivera was the dictator. The tension was between the right-wing Nationalists and left-wing Republican parties. The nationalist’s party was made up of monarchists, landowners, employers, the Roman Catholic Church and the army. The Republicans consisted of the workers, trade unions, socialists, and peasants. The nationalists were described as traditionalists and fascists, while the republicans were socialists and communists. The real political tension started occurring post 1930 when growing opposition to Miguel Primo de Rivera right-wing government started growing rapidly and leading to his resignation. Miguel Primo de Rivera was not able to solve Spain’s financial disaster from the result of the Great Depression, where unemployment rates increased drastically and Rivera never provided any solutions. Miguel was so unsuccessful throughout his dictatorship even the army refused to support his dictatorship. This then concluded in republican receiving the majority of the election votes, throwing out King Alfonso XIII the following year. The abdication of the King was the turning point; where Spain was now considered the Republic of Spa...