Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How movies sterortypes ethnic groups
Feminist movement in Indian literature
Representation of minorities in american cinema
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How movies sterortypes ethnic groups
Kamala Markandaya's Nectar in a Sieve and Deepa Mehta's Water are two pieces of Indian media that share the same general meaning, however different the circumstance and the reaction to them may be. The creators have fairly, but not entirely similar paths down their lives have been taken. Both pieces of art revolve around women who must overcome the challenge of change in order to be better in life, whatever route and form it takes shape in. Nectar in a Sieve's message was very more accepting by the public, possibly because of its target audience. Deepa Mehta's Water, which was meant for Indian viewers caused death threats and riots, among a few other things.
Both the creators of the novel and movie are similar in more ways than one. Kamala Markandaya was a Indo-British writer, whose work seemed to revolve around two parts of Indian history in the twentieth century, “The early Anglophone writing around the independence movement … and then a leap over several decades to the post-Rusdie era.” (George) She was born in Mysore, India in 1924 and had attended the University of Madras and studied history, and had also worked as a journalist before her first novel was published, Nectar in a Sieve. (Assisi)
Deepa Mehta, however was born in the midst of Markandaya's time as a journalist, a similarity lies that the two of them both have went through Universities with majors that have nothing to do with writing or film-making, the things Marandaya and Mehta are known for, respectively. Mehta was born in 1949, and had received a bachelor’s and masters degree in philosophy. (Post) Both women were born, raised, and educated in India. However they both went on to live in different places. Markandaya had lived in England since she was twenty-fi...
... middle of paper ...
...ly changing world, but one remains oppressed by certain groups while the other basks in fame. Though both of these pieces are telling the same message, there is no doubt that the world has changed, and that the people of the world should move along with it.
Works Cited
Assisi, Francis C. "Homage to Kamale Markandaya." Beilharz. N.p., n.d. Web. 1 Mar. 2014.
George, Rosemary M. "Where in the World Did Kamala Markandaya Go?" Novel: A Forum on Fiction. Providence: Brown University., n.d. 400-09. Print.
Kumar, Virendra, and Sarita Kanth. "Bride Burning." Lancet 364.(2004): 18-19. Academic Search Premier. Web. 10 Mar. 2014.
Markandaya, Kamala. Nectar in a Sieve. Columbus, Ohio: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill, 1954. Print.
"Mehta, Deepa." Postcolonial Studies Emory. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Mar. 2014.
Water. Dir. Deepa Mehta. Deepa Mehta Films, 2005. DVD.
One of the more apparent themes seen in both texts is that of discrimination against marginalised groups. Both texts send a clear message, that regardless of the circumstances,
...ide: ". . .one does not remain inert to make way for the other, but both obey their own laws, and spring and grow and flourish as best they can, till one, perchance, overshadows and destroys the other." All three of these comparisons, while being beneficial to the essay's main idea, are too obscure and irrelevant to have any real persuasive power.
Cam, Heather American Literature; Oct87, Vol. 59 Issue 3, p429, 4p Academic Search Complete Ebesco. Web. 25 July 2011
An example she presented in the article was a case of 16 years old girl that was married to her uncle at the age of 9, and pregnant at 12 in which she developed obstetric fistula after the death of her baby, she was recovering her 4th fistula surgery. This not even close to covering the horrors of childhood marriage in which many young girls are suffering around the global. She concludes that Fistula is 100% preventable, but because many of the young girls undergoing this, is in areas where there is no access to health care and resource, they are badly suffering this and even resulting in death. An important message she addresses is that child bride is preventable as this fistula is if it is taken into consideration in our
Love, an emotion everyone can relate to. This theme draws in many readers as it is a very passionate topic. In Nectar in a Sieve, by Kamala Markandaya, she attempts to use love as a major theme throughout the story to keep the audience engaged. However, this method doesn't work in this case because it is not true love, but rather an undermining theme guised by this “fake love.” The true theme, instead of love, is portrayed as anti-feminism and a degradation in power of women. Therefore, love is not an overlying theme in Nectar in a Sieve, but rather women’s dependence on men, which counters feminism beliefs and gives less power to women.
Both stories show feminism of the woman trying to become free of the male dominance. Unfortunately, the woman are not successful at becoming free. In the end, the two women’s lives are drastically
“Hindu symbolism and colour meanings dominate Indian culture and society,” in Global Graphics: Gloucester, Massachusetts:Rockpoint Publishers, pp.175-176. Stonjanova, Christina. 2010. “Beyond Tradition and Modernity: The Transnational Universe of Deepa Mehta,” in Brenda Austin-Smith & George Melnyk, Canadian Woman Filmmakers: The Genered Screen. Ontario, Canada: Canada Council for Fine Arts, pp.
Eden Robinson is a Haisla writer who was born at Haisla Nation Kitimaat Reserve on 19th January 1968 (“Eden Robinson” 2007). She has a Haisla father and a Heiltsuk mother and spent both her childhood and her adolescence in the Reserve (“Eden Robinson” 2007). Robinson obtained a bachelor’s degree in Fine Arts at the University of Victoria and also earned a master’s degree in Creative Writing at the University of British Columbia (“Eden Robinson” 2007). Monkey Beach is her first novel and was published in 2000 (“Eden Robinson” 2007).
...ce, although both writings are interesting in their own ways, the most interesting aspect of both writings together is that they both have a similar plot and theme. It is rare that two
The two novels were both growth novels, to a certain extent, which depicted the changes of the heroines as they grew up. In order to illustrate the changes, the authors employed similar plots and writing skills.
So to sum it all up, both of the novels are very typical of the Victorian Era. They both had the same theme of double personality and their way of writing was very harsh and describing. They were both affected by Darwin and his studies since they brought doubt to God’s creation of mankind. But there’s nothing unusual in being affected by the contemporary literature or science. Even nowadays we’re affected by new studies and ways of writing. If we weren’t influenced by the modern studies, we wouldn’t have any progress in our society.
All three versions had a theme about karma. If someone had courage, was kind, and hardworking, then they would have a marvelous life. Society needed to realize this, and learn this lesson. If society had enough courage to be kind then a great deal of problems around the world would not exist. Society needs to be compassionate, and have enough courage to help humanity out. Furthermore, it is essential that Society does not turn their backs on each other. If good happens to good people, and society is good, then the world would be a much better
These two authors are very similar. Both use dark, surrealistic language. Both men show different aspects of the descent into madness. Also both men use a descriptive, intelligent writing style. Instead of appealing to your emotions, or telling you what you should be feeling, they describe what is happening. Their descriptions may induce certain emotions, such as disgust, fear, or sadness, but they appeal first to the mind. They appeal first to the mind, and when the mind dictates to the heart that this is wrong, or strange, then the heart stirs and provides the appropriate emotion. Their writing styles may have their differences, but on the whole they are more alike than they are different.
Aside from the conditions, which lead to the creation of these works, they share a number of other common threads. Symbolism aside these works are very similar on the surface. Both are a collection of seemingly disjointed images, which when put together by the reader or observer serve up a strong social message. That messages being that the wars and conflicts of the times have twisted the world. This is reinforced by the contorted and misshapen images in both works.
...these two books with different author, different published century, different ways to create the story. It seems like different, but it’s the same in some way.