A writer’s vision and thought can be extracted from the words that they use in their stories. The evangelists in the Bible are no different. They are writing about events from memory; many of them were stories that were passed on generation to generation. Thus, their personal thoughts begin to make an entry into the way that they write their gospel and the words that they use. The evangelist had the final say as to how he would portray Jesus in his story. This was especially true in Mark’s gospel. Being the first one to recount the ministry of Jesus, he was not influenced by other well known accounts. Thus, the understanding that Mark has is seen through the approach that he took to write his gospel, which include both Jesus’ character traits as well as the meaning behind his ministry. When studying the way that Mark wrote the gospel, it can be seen how he perceives Jesus.
Many of the words that Mark uses describe how he thinks Jesus would have acted in the situation. One such word is immediately; Mark uses vocabulary that makes Jesus sound like he is in a hurry much of the time. This begins when Jesus first calls his disciples, Mark chose to use immediately twice in the story (1:17-20). Jesus’ haste can be seen in the way Mark says “immediately he called them and they left” (1:20). Mark shows that Jesus did not wait for the followers to come to him, and that his message about the reign of God had to begin. The momentum continues through the rest of Mark’s gospel. He uses this language in the story of the leper, the paralytic, and the girl restored to life and woman healed. All of these stories show that there is nothing too great for faith. That no one with faith shall wait to receive a message from God. Jesus emph...
... middle of paper ...
...cated.
After reading and studying Markan text, it is clear what he thought of Jesus as a person and a leader. The way that Mark writes and the descriptions that he chose to include truly give a Markan picture of Jesus. Consequently, his words also are used to relate the words of Jesus with Mark’s contemporaries. It is crucial to include every aspect of Mark and his audience when using Markan text to study Jesus.
Works Cited
Donahue, John R., and Daniel J. Harrington. The Gospel of Mark. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical, 2005. Print.
The NRSV Notetaker's Bible: New Revised Standard Version with the Apocrypha. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2009. Print.
Pagola, José Antonio. Jesus, an Historical Approximation. Miami, FL: Convivium, 2009. Print.
Wright, N. T. Simply Jesus: A New Vision of Who He Was, What He Did, and Why He Matters. New York: HarperOne, 2011. Print.
...yne A. The HarperCollins Study Bible New Revised Standard Edition . New York: HarperCollins Publishers, 1993. 1645-1722. Print.
Paul and Jesus both have similar topics they teach. Not only that, but Paul and Jesus have very similar teaching styles, with the key difference being how they react to mistakes made by their pupils. Paul and Jesus both lose their temper at points and get very angry, but Jesus transforms his anger into forgiveness, where Paul does not. These similarities and differences presented allow us to better understand what Jesus taught by referencing Galatians as a guide. Overall, we see that Mark and Paul’s letter to the Galatians show the similar beliefs Paul and Jesus had, but also show how they react when those beliefs are
The story I picked and was very comparable in Mark 5:1-20, Matthew 8:28-9:1, and Luke 8:26-39. These are all the story of Jesus healing a Demoniac told in different part of the New Testament that agree and disagree on the events that took place. Mark and Luke use a lot more detail to make sure the story is accurately portrayed whereas Matthew just sums up the story and changes major points. Jesus performs this one of his three major miracles in time and makes a huge difference just like the Messiah should.
Stanton, Graham. Gospel Truth?: New Light on Jesus and the Gospels. Valley Forge, PA: Trinity Press International, 1995. Paperback.
One of the main characteristics of the gospel of Mark is it’s length. Mark is much shorter than Matthew and Luke, but what it lacks in quantity, it makes up for in quality. The author of Mark does not slow down the gospel story and makes sure that only important and relevant details are included. When Mark is compared with Matthew and Luke, it becomes obvious to see what Mark has eliminated. The author’s omission of Jesus’ birth, lineage, resurrection, and ascension denote careful planning and purpose in the gospel of Mark.
The book consists of three parts. The first part has five chapters of which focuses on explaining what the key questions are and why we find them difficult to answer. The second part has nine chapters explaining in detail what N.T. Wright considers Jesus’ public career and the approach he had in first century Palestine. The third part of the book, the last chapter, challenges readers to wrestle with the questions of Jesus’ life and ministry.
Kodell, Jerome. "Luke." In The Collegeville Bible Commentary. Edited by Dianne Bergant and Robert J. Karris. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1988.
The gospels explain Jesus’ life and death including His identity but also his activities, works, leadership and his suffering. Jesus is seen as a manifestation of God’s relationship with humans. An important fact about Jesus is the humility and modesty associated with his birth, upbringing and death. The fact that such a person ...
Mark’s gospel and John’s gospel contain many differences from the beginning, but both end with Jesus’ crucifixion and resurrection. The gospels of John and Mark represent Jesus as two different people. The disparity is that Mark represents Jesus as a servant while John portrays Jesus as a divine being. However, one must realize the two texts are meant to read by different audiences during different time periods. Each description presents a particular aspect of the life of Historical Jesus.
Mark 8:34 is the only time on the Gospel when Jesus calls the crowd together with disciples because his message is of very high importance. The price for discipleship is a complete denial of yourself in the name of God . And the mission of Jesus is to bring this message to humankind through his suffering and death on the cross. In Mark's gospel Jesus provides his identity which becomes the turning point in the human history. Before He was teaching, healing the sick, had scraps with authorities and established a group of disciples . Was it his mission? No. Jesus is the Messiah.
The New Interpreter's Study Bible: New Revised Standard Version with the Apocrypha. Nashville: Abingdon Press, ©2003.
Holy Bible: Contemporary English Version. New York: American Bible Society, 1995. Print. (BS195 .C66 1995)
Davis, Basil, S. “The Identity of the Disciple whom Jesus Loved.” The Expository Times 113 no. 7 (2002): 230-231.
Willson, S. (1990). Discipleship according to Jesus : a sermon on Mark 3:13-19. Presbyterion, 16(2), 73-80.