Jean-Jacques Rousseau: A Brief Analysis

864 Words2 Pages

Rousseau: A Brief Summary Jean-Jacques Rousseau has been referred to as the father of the romanticism movement due to his philosophical writings challenging the status quo at the time. To help set the cultural scene surrounding him, he lived in Paris just prior to the French Revolution where turmoil was in the atmosphere. During this time in France’s history monarchs reigned, the Catholic Church was the leading religion, and those who were considered commoners were viewed as less than human. I believe Rousseau’s environment led him to ponder and write about assumptions regarding human nature, the government’s role in relation to humans, types of will people have, and educational methods. His works had some comparative and contrasting features …show more content…

Human nature to him was best when it was unspoiled by external forces because of his belief that human beings are inherently good. He asserted that a person not tainted by society, but rather ruled by their own emotions, would end up being unselfish, a concept he termed the noble savage. By allowing freedom of personal growth to occur, a person’s ultimate desire would be to live peacefully amongst each other (Hergenhahn & Henley, 2014). Rousseau’s vision however, assumed that people would not have, nor entertain, evil thoughts of one another. Therefore, it allowed a lot of unbridled freedom with the hopeful notion that people, when given the opportunity, would make virtuous choices for the betterment of society (Hergenhahn & Henley, 2014). As history has taught us, referring to Cain and Abel as a prime example, humans are apt to make immoral …show more content…

He believed children had innate skills that required space for growth and refinement, without the need for rigid structure. In his ruminations he proposed teachers and students venture into nature allowing children to explore their interests and freely ask questions of the instructor. This model emphasized that it is not best practice to have a teacher inflict their ideas on a student (Hergenhahn & Henley, 2014). I do think it is important for teachers to be open in permitting students to form their own opinions because personal potential can be suffocated

Open Document