Jake & Dinos Chapman

1194 Words3 Pages

Within the Chapman’s portfolio violence, abjection and fetishism combine to form an aesthetic immersed in taboo. Their abrasive imagery is deviously employed as a constructive means to overwhelm the viewer’s emotions while provoking a sense of shared existence. In spotlighting the communal fascination with grotesque subject matter, a deeper inspection of the mind occurs, thus showing an intuitive take on transgression. A deviant act, however small it may be, entices an individual to step outside the strict parameters of manufactured law, causing a euphoric feeling to resonate from within. At the same time this act creates an appalling sensation due to prescribed morality. This paradoxical effect stems from the very nature of prohibition, which denotes that its very existence cannot be conceived without an initial violation. The Chapman brothers feverishly explore the characteristics of humanistic defilement and apply their observations with complimentary media. While parasitically drawing from Goya’s lineage, Jake and Dinos create etchings and sculptures that also relate to Hans Belmar and Duane Hanson. These iconic predecessors are deployed as defensive structures, firmly established in antiquity, that lend aesthetics and concept to a shocking take on the human condition.

A clear and decisive canonic defense can be made between the themes of Francisco de Goya and Jake and Dinos Chapman. Their cemented relationship is naively based in shocking, nihilistic imagery that reflects the timeless atrocities of war. The intent of Goya’s Hazana con Muertos series utilizes refined chiaroscuro and a depth of symbolic icons to communicate the gruesome treatment of his people. Intentionally using printmaking as a tool for mass production d...

... middle of paper ...

... socially relevant. Then the brothers assume the grotesque aesthetic of transgression through their organism’s semblance to Bellmer’s mannequin. In the same breath they use this tool to acquire recognition and eventually show disinterest in any utilitarian purpose it may have served. The quality of craftsmanship, abject subject matter and immense detail they display in certain tableaus can only be compared to Hanson’s realist sculptures. An obvious parasitic tendency is evident throughout the brothers entire portfolio. Mockery and allusion follow this tendency, and add to its sarcastic potency. Their vast understanding of art history compliments every fabricated reference and allows for a wonderful ability to create obscenities. No matter what the Chapman team creates next it will definitely shock the public and cause the art world to lapse, for at least a moment.

Open Document