Ishmael

1599 Words4 Pages

Ishmael

Daniel Quinn’s Ishmael is the story of one man’s quest for knowledge and his desire to “save the world”. Answering a simple ad in the paper of a teacher looking for students (p4), the narrator is sent on an incredible philosophical journey. The teacher our narrator expects is not that which he finds, however, as our titular character Ishmael, so aptly named by Walter Sokolow (p18) as he sensed the gorilla’s almost divine presence, is that teacher. This teaching is made possible by Ishmael’s miraculous telepathic way of communication (p21).

Ishmael’s name, originally Goliath due his size and presumed demeanor (p14), I find incredibly fitting as he, like Abraham’s eldest son, appears to be sent from the heavens though in this case to save us from ourselves. I view Daniel Quinn’s Ishmael as more along the lines of the Islamic theology’s in that he is more of a prophetic character rather than the Jewish theology’s in which he is generally viewed as wicked though repentant (although it was a Jew who named him so that may make my view invalid). His divine nature and importance are most powerfully demonstrated by a few simple lines on a poster that the narrator finds in a pile upon Ishmael’s death. The question on the opposing side of said poster “WITH GORILLA GONE, WILL THERE BE HOPE FOR MAN?” (p263) is entirely reasonable as his teachings throughout the book make that question apparent in our own minds before it is ever even discovered.

Two primary components Ishmael’s lessons involve are the concepts of the “Leavers” and “Takers” (p38). The two terms are used as synonyms for primitive and civilized (p39) groups, respectively, where we, and all developed nations, along with Ishmael’s pupil are the Takers while nativ...

... middle of paper ...

...past 48 years. Over that same time period, however, the world population has doubled. This finding gives credence to Ishmael’s statement. But how do we stop this increase in production along with our other multitude of problems? Ishmael says, “You do it the same way you stop destroying the ozone layer, the same way you stop cutting down the rain forests. If the will is there, the method will be found” (p140). As much as the impact of greenhouse gases and the like are debated in our society, there’s no question that we are making the world a less and less livable place due to our destruction of various ecologies. That those debates are taking place at all shows that there is an interest, that there is a will, to remove ourselves from the path to self-destruction. And so the question remains, “WITH GORILLA GONE, WILL THERE BE HOPE FOR MAN?” I certainly think so.

Open Document