Is There Racism on Juries?

1051 Words3 Pages

Method Participants

A total of 133 participants (57 males, 73 females; 2 unreported) participated in this study. Participants were recruited from two online databases (SocialSci and MechanicalTurk) and students from a private northeastern college. The data from 8 participants that reported being Non-United States citizens and data from 10 participants who took less than 10 minutes or more than 2 hours was removed. Thus, the results were based on the data from 115 participants (48 male, 66 female). The mean age was 31.12 years, and most participants identified as Caucasian/White (79%). The remaining participants identified with a mix of racial backgrounds (3.5% Latino/Hispanic, 7% Asian/Pacific Islander/South Asian, 5% African American and 5% Biracial/Mixed Race). All participants provided informed consent.

Design and Materials

For this study a 2 (Perspective Taking Prime: Perspective Taking vs No Perspective Taking) x 2 (Victim Impact Statements: High Emotionality vs. Neutral Emotionality) x 2 (Victim Race: Black vs. White) between-participants design was implemented. Perspective taking, victim impact statements, and race of the victim were the independent variables manipulated to test what effect they had on jury sentencing, who did the jury hold responsible, juror empathy towards the defendant, towards the victim and towards the victim’s significant others, also taking into account jury’s attitudes towards death row, and racial stereotyping. The participants read a transcript of a trial where the defendant was found guilty.

Perspective Taking Prime. Prior to reading the trial, participants completed a test that ostensibly measured their cognitive skills. This task was a sentence-unscrambling task where participants would ...

... middle of paper ...

...family. Half the participants were randomly assigned the summary with high emotionally charged victim impact statements by the victim’s family on the profound impact of the death of the victim. The other half read victim impact statements that were neutral in the emotional content.

After reading the trial materials including the victim impact statements, participants rendered a sentence of either life in prison or the death penalty. Participants then completed a series of questionnaires that measured their empathy towards the defendant and victim, their attitude towards death penalty and their implicit and explicit racial attitudes. Lastly, we assessed a few manipulation checks and the participant’s demographic information, such as gender, age, and ethnicity. Finally, after having completing the questionnaires, participants were thanked and debriefed online.

Open Document