Into the Wild by Christopher Johnson McCandless

1175 Words3 Pages

The book, Into the wild, takes us into the world of a young man named Christopher Johnson McCandless. He travelled across the western United States from 1990 to 1992, and on April 28, 1992, he started his last adventure and walked into the wilds of Alaska. About 112 days later, he died of starvation. Unsurprisingly, public opinion polarized on his behavior. Some may admire his courage and noble ideals, though some regard him as an idiotic and arrogant narcissist. Although he died on his way to find the truth and back to nature, I believe that Chris McCandless should be considered as a hero, but I cannot completely approve of all his behaviors. Into the wild is a non-fiction book which expanded from the nine-thousand-word article by Jon Krakauer. This article ran in the January 1993 issue of the magazine Outside. Jon Krakauer was very much drawn toward the tale of McCandless and decided to write his story. He spent more than a year tracking down the details of the boy’s tramp. Then he used matter-of-fact tones to narrate what he chased on the path about the boy. The framework presented in this book can be separated into three parts: (1) retracing, including the interview with most of the important people who once kept company with Chris; (2) wildness, presenting mails generated from readers and several idealists that were in the similar situation with Chris; (3) affection, including the memory of parents, sister and friends. Firstly, the retracing is the convoluted path of McCandless to pursue his faith in the Alaskan taiga. The writer uses documentary style and story dispelling to depict the boy’s hitchhike and risks in Alaska, and tries to remain emotionally detached from personal convictions. The second, the wilderness, a... ... middle of paper ... ...Finally what Chris left for them was only the sadness. Chris had always been walking away from relationships just because he was afraid of the constraint by all kinds of relationships. While, as a matter of fact, real relationships with those people who will never ever hurt you would not ever limit you. Thus, what really counts is that we must learn to stay in the hard parts of life and try rather than run away. This may be called responsibility. All in all, Chris McCandless is a contradictory idealist. He was motivated by his charity but so cruel to his parents and friends. He redefined the implication of life, but ended his life in a lonely bus because of starvation, which he was always fighting against. Nevertheless, Chris and the readers all understand that “happiness only real when shared.” (129; chap.18) Maybe it’s paramount to the people who are now alive.

Open Document