Intertextual Analysis of Works of Art

3005 Words7 Pages

Postmodern art is the representation of the return to pre-modern art styles and genres, and there is no longer a division between art, popular culture, and media. This philosophical term challenged and reacted against what modernism had to say, echoing dramatic changes in our social and economic features. Furthermore postmodern essays and critiques coincided with the arrival of contemporary art. Contemporary art is more socially conscious and philosophically all encompassing of several styles and medias than art works previous to this era. Contemporary art is experimental and often includes crossbreeds of styles, as well as mixes of many varied periods of art history from earlier times to the present times. Contemporary art cultivates toward conceptual, political and social messages, addressing feminism, multiculturalism, globalization, bioengineering and AIDS, among other trends. Contemporary art is created in the here and now and which makes it contemporary to us. Contemporary art are works of art made from the 1960's or 70's up until the present and it is an ever-evolving art style. I will analysis three contemporary works of art and how different philosophers and theorists would interpret each one. The first work of art ‘Surreal’ by Marcus A. Jansen is an oil enamel collage on canvas done in 2009 hanging in the MW Gallery Aspen. Marcus Jansen fits into the general category of contemporary postmodernism because of the time period in which he paint, the various high and low subject matter he incorporates into his paintings, and his use of appropriation or barrowing. Jansen’s painting ‘Surreal’ appropriates images from Pablo Picasso’s painting ‘Guernica’ done in 1937, which depicts that towns bombing during the Spanish Civil Wa... ... middle of paper ... ...y object, existing only and truly in the artist’s mind, and that it is an expression of the artist’s emotions. Since the work of art according to this theory exist only in the artist mind than the answer, to the question of whether Lia Chavez artwork is art, is yes it is art. And then if it is also a representation of her emotions at the time she was most likely feeling remote, dejected, and commanding at the same time. Though also according to Collingwood so get to this state of release the artist must not know the outcome of the art before is happens. So then Chavez would not have been able to take her photographs with knowing in someway how they would turn out. Collingwood indicates this by saying “an artists who setting out to produce a certain emotion in his audience is setting out to produce not an individual emotion, but an emotion of a certain kind (p.126).”

Open Document