There are many arguing points as to the validity of inspecting 100% of all incoming containerized shipping crates. According to Jim Kouri, “Over 12 million containers enter our country each year, and less than six percent are heavily inspected” (Kouri). Sooner or later our enemies will attempt to utilize this weakness in our national defense system to attack American citizens and our way of life. Protecting our homeland, protecting our resources and preserving our national defense infrastructure is something that can no longer be overlooked or delayed until tomorrow.
Whether during peace or in times of war, our homeland security is something that must be taken very seriously. Our enemies will await their opportunity to attack the United States while we are most vulnerable and our attention is focused elsewhere. Any weaknesses in our national defense systems should be identified and rectified, with a sense of urgency.
Our government has already taken a few necessary steps in the proper direction by passing laws and initiatives directed toward increasing our border and port security. Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) describes the Container Security Initiative (CSI) as, “An effort to establish working bilateral partnerships with foreign authorities to identify high-risk cargo containers originating at ports throughout the world before they are loaded on vessels destined for the United States” (Container Security Initiative). The main goal of the Container Security Initiative is to foster an environment in which it is more difficult for transportation companies to transport illegal goods, by implementing inspections at foreign ports of origin.
However not all targeted cargo are being inspected overseas. This problem a...
... middle of paper ...
...urity. Office of the Inspector General. A Review of CBP and ICE Responses to Recent Incidents of Chinese Human Smuggling in Maritime Cargo Containers (Redacted). Washington, D.C., 2005
http://trac.syr.edu/immigration/library/P1939.pfd
Madrigal, Alexis. “Bots vs. Smugglers: Drug Tunnel Smackdown,” May 16, 2009.
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/05/tunnelbots/
White, Brian., “Border Patrol Unearths Intricate Drug Tunnel,” Oct. 22, 2009.
http://www.kold.com/Global/story.asp?S=11367578
Williams, Paul., “MS-12 Smuggles Thousands of Muslims Terrorists Into U.S.,” Aug. 01, 2009.
http://ibloga.blogspot.com/2009/08/ms-13-smuggles-thousands-of-muslim.html
“The Economic Costs of Disruptions in Container Shipments,” Congressional Budget Office, Washington, D.C., March 29, 2006.
http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/71xx/doc7106/03-29-Container_Shipments.pdf
I will first start to count the number of small cubes out of the 27;
... our ships being seized isn’t much cheaper. “From 1807 to 1812, more than nine hundred American ships were seized by either Britain or France”(“The War of 1812: Trade Embargoes”). This means in just one year, 200 ships were being seized. In any case, this is a lot of money down the drain – especially considering the size of the United States at the time. Each ship contained paid workers, loved family members, expensive supplies, the cost of replacing the ship, and because of all these seizes, no more international commerce. If this doesn’t put American economy in a bad position, I don’t know what will. Citizens would be asking: if we don’t act in a noticeable way, how much more would we loose? Every ship we send out into the Atlantic Ocean is fair game. Either Britain or France will attack every ship out there and – without intervention – there is nothing we can do.
The trend for this literature review topic is to discuss the benefits and shortcomings of the Department of Defense and National Guard in regards to Homeland Security. There is some controversy concerning duties that the National Guard can perform in respect to Homeland Defense and Civil Support which will be appraised.
As we move steadfast into the twenty-first century we are confronted with more complex and compromising issues affecting the intricately connected global system. New forms of aggression and threat are the faces that greet policy-makers as they spend countless hours configuring ways to counter future attacks such as terrorism or massive drug trafficking within and across national borders. Instead of submitting ourselves to the tyranny of chance, which cruelly deals out futures blighted with catastrophes that can remain vivid in our memories, President George W. Bush has issued a mandate in an attempt to regain control over future acts of aggression such as terrorism in the United State; he issued the Executive Order of Homeland Security as that initial step.
Just as Adam Smith supported the Navigation Acts in Great Britain to protect the navy (their chief means of defense; Smith 1776: 464), the United States has gone to great lengths to protect their chief means of defense: the technologically advanced electronics and machinery areas. The motive for these measures has not changed over the centuries. The desire to maintain superiority over other nations and to retain the ability to defend the sovereignty of the nation have remained an important aspect of both foreign and trade policy. It is the trade policy that we are most concerned with in this paper.
In a like manner, it’s helpful to turn the water off before replacing a busted pipe. With this intention, the Department of Homeland Security should implement techniques that would give them a sense of situational awareness concerning illegal activity around the border (H.R. 15). Further, this would continue to aid in the oversight of immigration even once the incorporation of immigrates into American society has been restored. In addition, borders and ports should utilize an accurate entry-exit system to restrict access to unauthorized people trying to enter the country (H.R. 15). Moreover, the system’s strict admittance procedure would further diminish the likelihood of a domestic terrorist
Jeffrey, Terence P. “Border Patrol Will Up Goal For Miles Of Border Secured.” Human Events
Drug trafficking has been a massive concern between the borders of Mexico and the U.S. “since mid 1970s” (Wyler, 1). Drug trafficking is “knowingly being in possession, manufacturing, selling, purchasing, or delivering an illegal, controlled substance” (LaMance, 1). A dynamic relationship exists amongst Columbia, Mexico, and the U.S. the informal drug trafficking economy. This growing informal drug economy leads to many individuals creating a substantial living through this undercover market. These individual drug cartels monopolizing the trafficking market are a growing problem for the U.S economy and need to be located and controlled. If this trafficking continues, the U.S. informal economy will crush the growth of legal industries. The trafficking and abuse of drugs in the U.S. affects nearly all aspects of consumer life. Drug trafficking remains a growing issue and concern to the U.S. government. The U.S. border control must find a way to work with Mexico to overpower the individuals who contribute to the drug trafficking business. This market must be seized and these individuals must be stopped.
Since the 1990s, the strategy of the Border Patrol has been termed “prevention by deterrence” and h...
Homeland Security’s mission is “to secure the nation from the many threats we face. With honor and integrity, we will safeguard the American people, our homeland, and our values.”[3]
...ion and drug smuggling has been on the rise the past few decades and our current approach is not confronting the escalating issue at hand. America’s safekeeping at our borders is not robust enough to deter these illegal immigrants and drug smugglers. Our border wall and security checkpoints must be strengthened immediately.
What is border security? The United States Customs and Border Protection define border security as a “top priority is to keep terrorists and their weapons from entering the U.S. while welcoming all legitimate travelers and commerce. CBP officers and agents enforce all applicable U.S. laws, including against illegal immigration, narcotics smuggling and illegal importation. Therefore, in order for the United States to be successful in securing the nation’s border, there is an essential need for border security. This has not been an easy challenge but it is something that has to be done otherwise imagine how great a disaster our nation would be. For over 86 years, the United States' approach to securing its border with Mexico has seen many changes and improvements, all of which have contributed positively to the prevention of illegal immigration, drug trafficking, and potential terrorism.
As an American who’s been raised in a country that firmly believes in its own excellence, I’ve always believed that my government would do anything within its power to protect me from all harm, and that I will be safely enclosed by its borders. Some may perceive this opinion as naive, but I have never had any reason to doubt my security. I believed a country as great as America would always be able to handle any issues that it encountered in a reasonable and measured fashion, equally maintaining the freedom of all of its citizens. However, I was mistaken.
...ts of terrorism against the United States. Homeland security has not only proven to be effective, it has shown that it is providing safety for the U.S. and its citizens against terrorist attacks.
The need to defend nation from terrorist attacks is a daily struggle. We have improved our security in airports, public and government building, sporting events and venues were large crowds are present. We have put protective measures in our theaters, schools, and places of worship. It doesn’t seem to be enough to add security personnel, metal detectors and body scanners. Terrorists still find ways to get passed the toughest security measures in place and cause mass casualties and destruction worldwide.