Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Short notes on gender bias
An esaay on punishment
An esaay on punishment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Short notes on gender bias
The Justice system seeks to prevent crimes and to capture those who have committed crimes. But what are the causes of crime, maybe poverty, or greed, or is sometimes caused by the system. Is the risk worth the reward and is reward the worth risking the punishment? Power and influence is threaded deeply into the Criminal Justice System. Are all offenders caught and processed with the same demeanor and given the same punishment? The system needs to be impartial to all offenders regardless of the offender’s social position, job or yearly income. The general punishment for most crimes is incarceration in most states with a difference in duration to adjust per each crime. This is the deterrent against crime. This is what should be keeping people from committing a crime. When comparing the reward and the punishment criminals should be realizing that it’s not worth it. The punishment is itself is flawed, once incarcerated, a person is branded a criminal, job interviews, travel, everything will be more difficult for the criminal. Incarceration rates of both men and women have been increasing every year. If a deterrent is working, incarceration rates would be dropping rather than increasing, yet instead of changing and creating a better deterrent, the Justice system keeps using a flawed system.
Racism and prejudice a problem that the Justice system has been experiencing for centuries. People can’t help but be racist or to hold some prejudice, everyone is racist and prejudice to some degree, it all depends on our surroundings as we grow and mature. Racism and prejudice will cause the system to prosecute the wrong people. Even if the offender is guilty, this can cause the system to keep arresting the wrong people in hopes of catching the ri...
... middle of paper ...
...//jimkinmartin.com/2012/01/10/large-california-traffic-ticket-fines-effective-01062012/>.
2. "Bureau of Justice Statistics prisoners in 2012 - Advance counts." Bureau of Justice Statistics prisoners in 2012 - Advance counts. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 May 2014. .
3. "Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS)." Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS). N.p., n.d. Web. 13 May 2014. .
4. " Arrests by Race and Age: 2009 " . N.p., n.d. Web. 13 May 2014. .
5. "Lancaster district judge Kelly Ballentine not cleared yet." LancasterOnline. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 May 2014. .
In the United States, true equality has never existed. From the Declaration of Independence to modern times, the U.S. legal system has failed in any attempt at equality. The ideology of "all [men] are equal but some [men] are more equal than others" has been present throughout the history of the U.S. (Orwell). Inequality has always existed in the United States legal system and continues to exist today; however, the inequality presently in the system is not as blatant as what it once was, but the system has come to depend on inequality. Since the very beginning of a legal system in the United States, there has been inequality.
Today, half of state prisoners are serving time for nonviolent crimes. Over half of federal prisoners are serving time for drug crimes. Mass incarceration seems to be extremely expensive and a waste of money. It is believed to be a massive failure. Increased punishments and jailing have been declining in effectiveness for more than thirty years. Violent crime rates fell by more than fifty percent between 1991 and 2013, while property crime declined by forty-six percent, according to FBI statistics. Yet between 1990 and 2009, the prison population in the U.S. more than doubled, jumping from 771,243 to over 1.6 million (Nadia Prupis, 2015). While jailing may have at first had a positive result on the crime rate, it has reached a point of being less and less worth all the effort. Income growth and an aging population each had a greater effect on the decline in national crime rates than jailing. Mass incarceration and tough-on-crime policies have had huge social and money-related consequences--from its eighty billion dollars per-year price tag to its many societal costs, including an increased risk of recidivism due to barbarous conditions in prison and a lack of after-release reintegration opportunities. The government needs to rethink their strategy and their policies that are bad
To begin, Mandatory minimum sentences result in prison overcrowding, and based on several studies, it does not alleviate crime, for example crimes such as shoplifting or solicitation. These sentencing guidelines do not allow a judge to take into consideration the first time offender, differentiate the deviance level of the offender, and it does not allow for the judge to alter a punishment or judgment to each individual case. When mandatory sentencing came into effect, the drug lords they were trying to stop are not the ones being affected by the sentences. It is the nonviolent, low-level drug users who are overcrowding the prisons as a result of these sentences. Both the U.S. Sentencing Commission and the Department of Justice have determined that mandatory sentencing is not an effective way to deter crime. Studies show that mandatory minimums have gone downhill due to racial a...
Arrests by Race, 2006. Retrieved from http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0004896.html US Census Bureau. (2011). The 2012 Statistical Abstract. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/cats/law_enforcement_courts_prisons.html
"Introduction To The Federal Court System." The United States Department of Justice - United States Attorney's Office. N.p., n.d. Web. 03 Mar. 2014. .
Uggen, Christopher, Sarah Shannon, and Jeff Manza. "State-Level Estimates of Felon Disenfranchisement in the United States, 2010." The Sentencing Project News -. The Sentencing Project, 20 Aug. 2012. Web. 28 Feb. 2014.
The Criminal Justice system was established to achieve justice. Incarceration and rehabilitation are two operations our government practices to achieve justice over criminal behavior. Incarceration is the punishment for infraction of the law and in result being confined in prison. It is more popular than rehabilitation because it associates with a desire for retribution. However, retribution is different than punishment. Rehabilitation, on the other hand is the act of restoring the destruction caused by a crime rather than simply punishing offenders. This may be the least popular out of the two and seen as “soft on crime” however it is the only way to heal ruptured communities and obtain justice instead of punishing and dispatching criminals
...r own unique ways.; however, the authors focus on different aspects of prejudice and racism, resulting in them communicating different ideas and thoughts that range from racial discrimination to stereotypical attitudes. The range of ideas attempt to engage the readers about the reality of their issues. The reality about a world where prejudice and racism still prevail in modern times. But when will prejudice and racism ever cease to exist? And if they were ever to cease from existence, what does that mean about humankind?
From the beginning of the Criminal Justice System, the obsession was with prison and punishment. In the last few years, this focus forced the jail and prison populations to skyrocket higher than any other place in the world. There is never a class we are not reminded there are currently 2.3 million people in United States prisons and jails. The criminal justice system or the correctional system has not changed yet remained its focus on deterrence and isolation not on the proactive ways of dealing with crime.
Weatherburn, D. (2011) ‘Uses and abuses of crime statistics’, Contemporary Issues in Crime and Justice, 153: 1-16
Racism and prejudice has been present in almost every civilization and society throughout history. Even though the world has progressed greatly in the last couple of decades, both socially and technologically, racism, hatred and prejudice still exists today, deeply embedded in old-fashioned, narrow-minded traditions and values.
"Juvenile Violent Crime Time-of-day Profiles." Juvenile Violent Crime. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Nov. 2013. .
Today, a vicious cycle of poverty, criminality, and incarceration traps too many Americans and weakens too many communities. And many aspects of our criminal justice system may actually exacerbate these problems, rather than alleviate them.
A well-established fact in criminology is that crime rates vary throughout a community center largely on where offenders live (Gore & Pattavina, 2004). Research completed by Shaw and McKay in the mid-1900s found that juvenile offenders were more likely to live in areas characterized by economic disadvantage, residential instability, and ethnic heterogeneity (Gore & Pattavina, 2004).
The present system of justice in this country is too slow and far too lenient. Too often the punishment given to criminal offenders does not fit the crime committed. It is time to stop dragging out justice and sentencing and dragging our feet in dispensing quick and just due. All punishment should be administered in public. It is time to revert back to the "court square hanging" style of justice. This justice would lessen crime because it would prove to criminals that harsh justice would be administered.