The interrelations of social segregation and Inequality have been largely studied by several authors (Fernández y Rogerson, 1996 y 1997; Bénabou 1996a y 1996b; Gravel y Thoron, 2007; Durlauf, 1996). Nevertheless, the majority of these studies have concentrated in demonstrating the possibility of a segregated equilibrium. This last is understood as the formation of consecutive clubs, ordered in accordance with a variable that represents the social position of the economic agents. In the majority of the studies, this variable is the wealth of the persons or his human capital.
The problem with this kind of models is that they do not study the effect of the income distribution over the degree of segregation. As a result, they can't answer questions like the following: the size of the coalitions decrease with the degree of wealth inequality? In a society, the size of the coalitions formed by wealthy agents are bigger than the coalition of the poor ones? This is an important weakness of this type of literature. In effect, the collective interrelation inside coalitions can determine the accumulation of social capital and human capital, and it is well-known that the both are essentials factors in economic development (Benabou, 1996a; Glomm y Ravikumar, 1992; Fernández y Rogerson, 1996; Durlauf, 1996)
Some authors as Bénabou (1996th) and Glomm and Ravikumar (1992) compare the economic and distributive outcomes of integrated versus segregated societies. That kind of analysis is relevant to analyze problems such as the benefits and cost of public versus private education. Nevertheless, it is not very useful in analysing other problems as the determinants and the consequences of Social segregation.
In this paper, we study t...
... middle of paper ...
...artition.
Jehiel and Scotchmer (1997 and 2001) characterise the free mobility equilibrium. However, they do not introduce heterogeneity in the distribution of wealth, and they suppose a very unrealistic utility function (linear). Moreover, their distribution of characteristics of agents is very narrow (uniform). Finally, they have not made the comparative static exercises required to understand the relationship between the heterogeneity of the agents and the degree of social segregation.
Most of the models that demonstrate the existence of a consecutive core equilibrium, use super additive and cooperative games. (Greenber y Weber, 1986; Demange, 1982 y 1994). However, this kind of model have two defects. First, although they demonstrate the existence of a consecutive equilibrium, they do not analyze the effect of inequality on the size of coalitions.
Manza, Jeff and Michael Sauder. 2009. Inequality and Society: Social Science Perspectives on Social Stratification. New York: Norton.
Wealth inequality did not always exist in human life. In fact, “Human life have not only been changed, but revolutionized, within the past hundred years” (Carnegie 1). There used to be
Briggs, Vernon. (1998, June 1). American-Style Capitalism and Income Disparity: The Challenge of Social Anarchy. The Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 32, 473 (8).
Clark and Lipset (1991) explain that looking at class theories that has been a lot of change in class and it has altered the concept of class toward the fragmentation of stratification. Clark and Lipset (1991) further explains that changes have occurred since Marx and Weber write their view on social stratification and it went into high gear since 1970s. Clark and Lipset (1991) acknowledge a change for the theories of stratification is that traditional hierarchies is declining and economic and family hierarchies is less than generation or two ago. Clark and Lipset (1991) explains that class conflict declines, there would be less conflict or organized lines, for instance gender. However, not all hierarchies are generating counter-reactions and there is an acceptance of democratic process to allow the opposition to surface. According Clark and Lipset (1991), “the key trends could be described as one of fragmentation of stratification: the weakening of class stratification, especially as shown in distinct class-differentiated lifestyle, the decline of economic determinism, and the increased importance of social and cultural factors, politics is less organized by class and more by other loyalties, the slimming of the family and social mobility is less family-determined, more ability and education
When it comes to sociological research, Grusky and Weisshaar give specific layers or information about the four parameters of inequality and what they mean. These factors give common over views of the category in which the unfair distribution of goods and income are spread. The four parameters are listed as the amount of inequality, rigidity, ascriptive processes, and crystallization (Grusky and Weisshaar
Segregation is often a term overlooked by many in recent years, but still can have a detrimental effect on a country’s economy. Segregation often leads to poverty, which in turn, also has a negative effect on the economy, leading to a disadvantage in countries, particularly the United States and South Africa. Racial segregation is apparent in the United States and affects many cities, depending on the number of segments there are within a particular city. The effects of segregation cannot lie in the hands of one person, rather all the people that make an economy. In 1944, Gunnar Myrdal refers to racial segregation as “a basic term that has its influence in an indirect and impersonal way” (Massey, 1993). The following examples are how “simple increases in the rate of minority poverty leads to socioeconomic character of communities, which in turn leads to disadvantages caused by racial segregation” (Douglas, 1990).
With these information about wealth and history, it is concluded that one of four races considered nonwhite have one chance of growing in their economy. The racial wealth gap can take people back in time to see how the economy of the nation was created. There is no fairness in base of the economy. If each one of the citizens in the coutry are considered equal under the law, why can’t it be the same in the economy? Segregation and discrimination continue to exist in the nation. Whites are not considered equal as nonwhites. In conclusion, if this gap between the races perdures to be open there will never be true equality and justice.
9. Marger, Martin. Social inequality: pattern and processes / martin N. Marger – 2nd. p.169)
At first it is hard to understand why schools are segregated without understanding its causes. There is an obvious social and economic disadvantage, fueled by residential isolation, economic circumstance, and discrimination. I use my first question, why are schools and districts racially and socioeconomically segregated, as an introduction to my analysis. In the article, 60 Years After Brown: Trends and Consequences of School Segregation, authors Readron & Owens (2014) discuss the many factors that contribute to school segregation, and how and why school segregation might affect students. The authors use different indices on how school segregation is measured, being the measurement of isolation or exposure and measures of unevenness. Indices of unevenness measure the extend to which a student population is unevenly distributed among schools, and in contrast, the indices of exposure or isolation measure the extent to which students are enrolled in schools with high or low proportions of a given racial group. (pg. 202) The research done by Readron & Owens demonstrates the different levels of segregation student’s experience, and the consequences it leads to. School resources are distributed among students unevenly, meaning the teachers will be less skilled, there will be less exposure to more challenging curriculum. Housing segregation and school district fragmentation are also largely related to school segregation and student
In the United States, the gap between the rich and the poor has been substantially increasing over the years. This growth between the rich and poor illustrates the wealth inequality between the social classes in our nation. Although it is impractical to precisely measure the morality of wealth inequality, we can use philosophical thought to determine what makes a political and economic system just. By analyzing the theories of political philosophers, Robert Nozick and John Rawls, it is clear that wealth inequality is morally justified, as long as equal opportunity and concern for justice among a society is provided under certain conditions.
First, the chapters cover stratification. According to study.com “Social stratification refers to a system by which a society ranks categories of people in a hierarchy. In the United States, it is perfectly clear that some groups have greater status, power, and wealth than other groups.” According to the textbook “Stratification is unequal distribution of valued
Segregation in the United States refers to the unequal treatment of people who come from different races. US is a country that has people of all races. However, the minority races have been ignored and segregated over time. This paper evaluates segregation in US and tells whether the situation has since changed. The paper also addresses the causes of the racial segregation and how it can be eliminated.
According to Black?s definition, stratification is ?the vertical aspect of social life?, ?any uneven distribution of the material conditions of existence? (Black 11), in other words the discrimination of wealth. Stratification can be measured in quantity, delineated in style and viewed from two perspectives, as a ?magnitude of difference in wealth? (Black 11) and as the level to which the setting is stratified. Moreover, stratification explains not only law, its quantity and style, but also other aspects of social life. The relationship Black is mostly interested in is the positive correlation between stratification and law, meaning the more law, the more stratified the setting is. When utilizing this proposition by inserting other variables of social ...
The unequal distribution of wealth is seen as a negative and ongoing problem and debate within American politics and society. There is a great deal of evidence to back up why wealth distribution is damaging the American ideals of life. It also carries inevitable and undetermined consequences for our nation. How resources are distributed within a country depends on where the resources were found. For example, numerous people will move to an area that is rich with resources in order in ensure job security. Just because a country is fruitful in a resource does not mean that that particular country is wealthy. In fact, the laborers are paid very minimal...
Stewart, Charles T., Jr. "Inequality of Wealth and Income in a Technologically Advanced Society." The Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies 27.4 (2002): 495-512. Print.