Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
cesar chavez influence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: cesar chavez influence
This dissertation closely examines the impact and significance of Hugo Chavez’s legacy on the Venezuelan population and the neighboring nations during his reign. The essay evaluates the rigid and infamous public relations Chavez had with other superpowers around the world, but more precisely the United States of America. The dissertation focuses on how the former leader reached his position of power under an unconventional Venezuelan government that was heavily contaminated with corruption. Furthermore, the dissertation will discuss some of Chavez’s achievements after his emergence through the failed Coup of 1994 and eventually his victory in the democratic election of 1998. Accomplishments such as the reform of the healthcare sector, the development of Venezuela’s sustainable economy over his tenure, and most importantly Chavez’s avid support for a higher quality educational system for his people. Lastly, I will debate on the possible scenarios for Venezuela’s future under the leadership of newly elected Nicolas Maduro.
The United States has had a long history of violence and political tension with Venezuela citing as early as the 1900’s with the Venezuela crisis of 1902-03. But with time and new political philosophies from both nations, these rigid tensions faded away slowly but surely to accommodate for the contemporary needs of both nations. The United States and Venezuelan leaders eventually decided to work together in order to eliminate the illegal drug trafficking which has plagued the Latin American continent for decades under the tenure of President Rafael Caldera. But this time of prosperity wore out soon after Hugo Chavez won the 1999 election in a democratic manner. Despite the overwhelming suppor...
... middle of paper ...
...uela’s Mission Robinson Literacy Program at 9 Years." venezuelanalysis.com. N.p., 29 Oct 2012. Web. 15 Dec 2013. .
Sirr, Rebecca T. "Misión Barrio Adentro: Experiencing Health Care as a Human Right in Venezuela ." upsidedownworld.org. N.p., 24 May 2007. Web. 15 Dec 2013. .
"Venezuelan Government’s Mission Mercal Celebrates 9th Anniversary." venezuelanalysis.com. Correo del Orinoco International , 27 Apr 2012. Web. 15 Dec 2013. .
Weisbrot, Mark. "The United States Shows its Contempt for Venezuelan Democracy." Portside.com. The Guardian, 22 Apr 2013. Web. 15 Dec 2013. .
All throughout the 20th century we can observe the marked presence of totalitarian regimes and governments in Latin America. Countries like Cuba, Chile, Brazil, Argentina, Nicaragua and the Dominican Republic all suffered under the merciless rule of dictators and military leaders. Yet the latter country, the Dominican Republic, experienced a unique variation of these popular dictatorships, one that in the eyes of the world of those times was great, but in the eyes of the Dominicans, was nothing short of deadly.
"The Cambridge History of Latin America." Google Books. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 May 2014. <http://books.google.com/books?id=3NiCQFfSGIkC&pg=PA313&lpg=PA313&dq=carlos+chavez+obertura+republicana&source=bl&ots=Jp3wnnLfmu&sig=Aa-BUEPyHXZhKj67mkSB5UsHylE&hl=en&sa=X&ei=N9R2U-fsBoK_oQSWr4D4AQ&ved=0CCUQ6AEwADge#v=onepage&q=carlos%20chavez%20obertura%20republicana&f=false>.
Bolivar illustrates the relationship between the Spanish American colonies and Spain. The relationship could be described as bitter, at least in the eyes of the Spanish colonies. Inferiority led the Spanish colonies to the ideas of revolution. Although their rights come from the Europeans, they do not acknowledge themselves as Europeans or Indians. The people of the Spanish colonies claim to be, according to Bolivar, “[…] a species midway between the legitimate proprietors of [America] and the Spanish usurper” (411). “Usurpers” meaning a position that is held by forces which entails an unwanted or uninvited relationship. It is because of the Europeans, as stated by Bolivar, that “we have to assert [European] rights against the rights of the natives, and at the same time we must defend ourselves against invaders [which] places us in a most extraordinary and involved situation” (411). This is also evidence of a bitter rela...
Gott, Richard. 2013. "Man against the world: as illness ends Hugo Chavez's rule in Venezuela, what will his legacy be? Here, Richard Gott argues he brought hope to a continent--while overleaf, Rory Carroll asks if the price of change was too high. (Cover story)." New Statesman (1996), 2013. 20. Academic OneFile, EBSCOhost (accessed December 2, 2013).
Walker, Thomas W and Armony, Ariel C. Repression, Resistance, and Democratic Transition in Latin America. Scholarly Resources Incorporated, 2000. Wilmington, Delaware.
White, Robert E. 2013. "After Chávez, a Chance to Rethink Relations With Cuba". The New
Hugo Chavez was the president of Venezuela from 1999 to 2013. He had an interesting way of running the country during his presidency. His political position or ideology could be best defined as Bolivarianism for many reasons. Bolivarianism can be described as a set of doctrines that was popular in South America. It is named after the famous liberator Simon Bolivar. Hugo Chavez’s ideology involved ideas from others he had come to admire. Of course one of those that he admired was Simon Bolivar. The ideas for his ideology all began at a young age when he fell in love with history (Jones 23). During this age Hugo Chavez would often times read about a general named Ezequiel Zamora whom his great great grandfather had served (Marcano, Tyszka 11). Ezequiel Zamora will become a major influence in his ideology later on in his life. Besides Zamora, Chavez would also read about many other theorists. Hugo Chavez not only lived in poverty but also witnessed how bad the poverty around him was (Jones 25-26). Chavez did not like this poverty and wanted to change that any way he could. As he grew up he continued reading about the different theorists and ideologies that they made up (Jones 40). So since a young age Chavez had always been a leftist. As mentioned earlier it continued throughout his life and it intensified during his days at the military academy (Wilpert 07) Eventually Chavez became the president and his political position progressed further left (Wilpert 07). In other words he rejected both far left ideologies such as communism or Marxism-Leninism and moderate ideologies such as social democracy or the third way. However Chavez was aware of these different ideologies but did not consider being part of it. Hugo Chavez instead began t...
Before 1958, Venezuela had been a dictatorship under the rule of General Pérez Jiménez (Golinger 23). Despite his unpopularity, Jimenez left a mark on Venezuela in the form of a myriad of public works (Anderson). In 1961, Venezuela’s first constitution, which gave Venezuelans new rights, was ratified (Golinger ...
Interesting processes and historical figures appear before our eyes, with similarities and differences that can give much to talk about, as in the case of the Cuban Revolution and its main figure Commander Fidel Castro, and the Venezuelan process that came to power exactly 40 years after the triumph of the Cuban revolution, when Lieutenant Colonel Hugo Chavez became president of Venezuela who was the head of the Bolivarian Revolution. The long relationship between Cuba and Venezuela and particularly among their leaders have triggered a number of similarities and differences found in the ways they manage the power and also in their social and political ideals.
To a country like America, which is the world's largest consumer of fossil fuels by far, nothing could be more encouraging than to share geographical proximity with a nation so abundantly endowed with oil. Increasingly, however, a common neighborhood is all the U. S. shares in common with Venezuela. The two nations are clearly drifting apart, and at an alarming pace. The lightening rod in America's relationship with its South American neighbor is Hugo Chavez. In many recent pronouncements, the President o...
Schemo, Diana Jean. “Renegade Officer Favored in Venezuelan Election.” The New York Times. On-line. Internet. 6 December 1998. Available WWW: http://www.nytimes.com/library/world/americas
Filmmaker Oliver Stone embarked on a journey across the Latin American continent pursuant to the filling of gaps left by mainstream media about the social and political movements in the southern continent. Through a series of interviews he conducted with Presidents Hugo Chávez of Venezuela, Cristina Kirchner and former president Nėstor Kirchner of Argentina, Evo Morales of Bolivia, Fernando Lugo of Paraguay, Lula da Silva of Brazil, Rafael Correa of Ecuador and Raúl Castro of Cuba, Stone was able to compare firsthand information from the leaders themselves with that reported and published by the media (“Synopsis,” n.d.). It gives light to the measures these leaders had to take in order to initiate change in their respective countries, even if their public identities were at stake. Several instances in the film showed the mismatch between these two sources, pointing at the US government’s interests for greatly influencing the media for presenting biased, groundless views.
Simon Bolivar was proclaimed “Liberator” by his own people and a world-renowned figure in his day. His prophetic vision of hemispheric solidarity lives today, and his political thinking serves dictators and democrat alike in contemporary Latin America. This paper explores the impact the days of colonialism and revolution, in which treatment of Creoles was inferior to Peninsulares (Spaniards born in Spain). And this was a long-standing cause of frustration and resentment that contributed to the desire for independence from Spain. In addition, this paper analyzes some facts of one of the greatest minds of the 18th century “Simon Bolivar”. There is abundant evidence that Bolivar worked extensively to create a system that would preserve unity and stability through a powerful, centralized government while retaining as much individual liberty as possible; but his efforts were exhausting and fruitless. However, even today (after 200 years) his contribution had been to promote the idea of independence among Spanish-American leaders. Simon Jose Antonio de la Santisima Trinidad Bolivar y Palacios (this was his real name) was born on July 24, 1783, the year England’s North colonies won their independence. [1] His father had been an important figure and the landlord of twelve houses in Caracas, herds of cattle, indigo plantations, mines, and sugar plantation that had been in the family for at least two centuries. He had organized a militia battalion in which his youngest son (Simon) would later serve, and he had been Caracas’s deputy to Madrid. Like many Creoles who visited Spain, he was disillusioned by Spain’s backwardness in comparison to other European nations. The Venezuelan Creoles, like those of other S...
Now days democracy has been establish in every Latin America country except Cuba, which is still a socialist state. It seemed that every other alternative form of government such as Marxism or Leninism has failed and been replaced by democracy. Furthermore it looks like people in Latin American really enjoy democracy and its’ benefits, as they also consider it to be the best form of government. After the failure of authoritarian leaders and the military intervene their lives, Latin American citizens wanted to change their system into a more fair and honest system, democracy. Democracy is usually defined as a system of honesty, equality, freedom of rights, though for Latin America countries it means gains, welfare and patronage. Latin American did not work the democratic system properly as it should be and different obstacles keep the system away from being consolidated. Democracy in Latin America still face serious problems in matters as grinding poverty, huge social gaps, corruption, drug dealing, inefficient governments and most importantly governments who promote and use military. The real question is why democracy actually failed even though democracy is what people want. Paraguay is a case of failure in transition democracy because of the corruption and other things that will be argued in this essay. Paraguay and Ecuador are considered to be the only countries that democratization did not achieve consolidation, in differ from Chilli and Central American.
Wilpert, G. (n.d.). Chávez’s Legacy of Land Reform for Venezuela. Retrieved from Review of Agrarian Studies: http://www.ras.org.in/chavezs_legacy_of_land_reform_for_venezuela