Improving Watermark Detection by Preprocessing Operation

903 Words2 Pages

When designing a watermarking algorithm, trade-offs exist among three parameters: payload, fidelity, and robustness. Data payload is the number of bits that can be embedded in the digital data; the fidelity is the degradation introduced into the signal; and the robustness is the ability of the watermark to remain readable after innocent or malicious signal processing operations on the watermarked image. These parameters are conflicting with each other, and they should be set to meet the requirements of the application (Levicky & Foris,2004).

Watermarking techniques are generally classified into spatial domain or the transform domain. The earlier watermarking techniques were almost in the spatial domain. Spatial domain techniques are not resilient enough to image compression and other image processing (Potdar & et al, 2005). Although some methods, e.g. in (Depovere & et al,1998), adopted pre-filtering skill to increase the percentage of identification, experimental results have shown the fundamental disadvantages of spatial domain watermarking. Transform domain watermarking schemes like those based on the discrete cosine transform (DCT) ((Chu, 2003), ( Lin & Chin2000), ( Deng & Wang, 2003)) and the discrete wavelet transform (DWT) ((Hsieh &et al, 2001), ( Reddy & Chatterji, 2005), (Tay & Havlicek, 2002)) typically provide higher image imperceptibility and are much more robust to image manipulations.

It is generally believed that the performance of most existing watermarking systems is not close enough to the fundamental limit on robust watermark embedding rates at which high perceptual image quality is maintained. Although, embedding the watermark in the perceptually significant coefficients could alter the perceived visual quali...

... middle of paper ...

...f the Third International Conference on Image and Graphics, IEEE, pp. 349 - 352.

26) A. Jain, (1989). “Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing”, Prentice-Hall, Chap. 7.

27) R. Schalkoff, (1989). “Digital Image Processing and Computer Vision”, John Wiley & Sons, Chap. 4.

28) R. Haralick and L. Shapiro, (2006). “Computer and Robot Vision”, Vol. 2, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

29) Tinku Acharya, Ajoy K. Ray, (2005). “Image Processing Principles and Applications” A Wiley Interscience, pp. 253 – 285.

30) B. Horn, (1986). “ Robot Vision”, MIT Press, Chap.6, 8.

31) D. Vernon, (1991). “Machine Vision”, Prentice-Hall, pp. 98 - 99, 214.

32) D. Marr, (1982). “Vision”, Freeman, Chap. 2, pp. 54 - 78.

33) G. Langelaar, I. Setyawan, R.L. Lagendijk, (2000). “Watermarking Digital Image and Video Data”, in IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, Sep, Vol 17, pp. 20-43.

Open Document