Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
effect of outsourcing
effects of outsourcing in america
effect of outsourcing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: effect of outsourcing
What are the best ways for businesses to maximize profits? Businesses in the U.S. have answered this question with a very simple answer: make products overseas. This business tactic of using labor services from a third party is known as international outsourcing (Brecher 996). Within U.S. borders, there are certain regulations and restrictions on many aspects of the manufacturing process (Stephanie para 2). However, production is cheaper if they are made countries where regulations are less strict (Wood 25; Stephanie para 1). Despite the profits made from this technique, it can have some repercussions on the U.S. economy and the environment of nations occupying those factories (Marquis 39; Ahmed 192; Zhang 776). This springs a debate to whether more concern should be held for the outcry of Americans to bring jobs back to the U.S. (Ahmed 192; Stephanie para1) or to the freedoms of the businesses and their right to seek a profit (Salanţă 270). Both sides can agree that outsourcing can be desirable for a business do to the potential profit. It allows goods to be made cheaper, management to run smoother, and money to be made faster (Salanţă 270). Both sides can also agree, however, that U.S. jobs are lost as a result of outsourcing (Ahmed 192), as well as environmental damage being cause due to corporations taking advantage of loose environmental regulations (Marquis 39). Upon digging deeper into this debate, one can find that both sides present very convincing arguments. In many cases outsourcing has proven to be beneficial for businesses. It can help a business’s management by allowing executives to focus on the core structure of the firm rather than every specific element. Production, manufacturing, or additional servic... ... middle of paper ... ...014.< http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.gatekeeper2. lindenwood.edu/ehost/detail?sid=ca8f1347-1e04-4d9c-aed3-f1dc97593a6d%40 sessionmgr4002&vid=5&hid=4208&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=nfh&AN=J0E317291521204>. Wood, Joel. "The Effects Of Environmental Regulation On The Competitiveness Of US Manufacturing." Fraser Forum (2012): 25. Business Source Complete. Web. 6 Mar. 2014.< http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.gatekeeper2.lindenwood.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/ pdfviewer?sid=232efdbd-1043-415b-af6f-5a75b828a29a%40sessionmgr4003&vid= 5&hid=4111>. Zhang, Ting. "International Outsourcing And Unemployment In A Minimum-Wage Economy." Review Of International Economics 19.4 (2011): 776-786. Business Source Premier. Web. 11 Mar. 2014.< http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.gatekeeper2.lindenwood.edu/ ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=b295036e-d1cf-4835-97be-785c1702a15c% 40sessionmgr4001&vid=3&hid=4208>.
Outsourcing is a complicated and a multifaceted subject that involves a “business[’s] purchase of parts or labor from another company rather than maintaining a sufficient enough number of its own employees to do the same work in the country where the company is already based” ("Outsourcing"). The first practice of outsourcing was in medieval times when “nation-states called in soldiers-for-hire to help their own military forces during ongoing conflicts” ("Outsourcing"). Many think of outsourcing as a one way trade of production facilities moving outside of a companies locale but in actuality it is a two way trade that also involves companies from other areas moving their factories to local areas where conditions are beneficial for the specific business. Outsourcing has evolved but the main idea has remained the same. The recent increase in outsourcing “was initiated by Wall Street pressures on corporations . . . . for increased profits . . . in the production of goods and services marketed in the U.S."(Roberts).
As the problem of job outsourcing becomes more of an issue in politics, elected officials like the President and Congress will no longer be able to ignore the dilemma. The war in Iraq has been at the forefront of the presidential race but the importance of outsourcing American jobs seems to have been slightly overshadowed. If the issue of outsourcing is not watched carefully and a definitive plan hammered out, a trickling down of negative effects may occur within the U.S. economy. However, there is a polarized opinion on the effects of this “phenomenon”.
Since the concept of outsourcing was introduced it has been a subject of debate between politicians and citizens of the United States. Remarkably, it was the United States who supported outsourcing and now it is the United States that feels its economic progress is being threatened by outsourcing. One may argue that the financial situations that existed two decades earlier are not the same as they are today, thus the change of time, business priorities of economies have also changed.
One of the hottest trends today for big corporations is outsourcing and offshoring. Outsourcing simply means a company based in one nation will hire from other nations in order to more efficient accomplish its goals. It makes sense on the part of the corporation, why pay a programmer in the US $80,000 a year when they can pay a programmer in India less than 1/10th of that salary, and make him a very happy man. This because even when he is earning 1/10th of the US salary, he is still earning more money than he ever hoped to get in that industry in India. It seems like a win-win situation1, but there is still a loser: The growing unemployed population of the US. As more jobs go overseas, more US citizens are finding themselves becoming obsolete.
With the United States’ economy in a depression and our unemployment rate skyrocketing to record highs, job-outsourcing has moved to the top of the list of controversial issues. Froma Harrop’s essay New Threat to Skilled U.S. Workers and Thomas Friedman’s essay 30 Little Turtles discuss two different viewpoints of job-outsourcing, and their effects on society. Does our government really want to cut back on job-outsourcing, and what can society do to help the issue? Friedman’s standpoint on job-outsourcing shows how it is emotionally beneficial to other countries and Harrop’s factual standpoint shows job-outsourcing regulation, however, I feel that our citizens are unaware of the opportunities and our government is eager to send the jobs overseas.
...ect on the college graduates and younger children of today. Outsourcing has made nothing but trouble for the United States with the passing of free trade agreements. It will cause a lack of jobs that will run the economy into the ground, and ruin the lives of the citizens of the United States. All of that so a business can use its faulty practices to make a higher profit. Outsourcing has consequences that will haunt the average American and their families for the rest of their existence on this planet.
Many people think that outsourcing is jobs that were held in this country going somewhere else. That is not entirely accurate. Outsourcing is actually one company paying another to do some work for it. Outsourcing can be as simple as paying a company to paint your building. Or it can be as complex as paying a company to control your human resources department.
Outsourcing has only very recently become an issue in the United States, and as a result it has become a very popular political issue during campaigns for presidency. Outsourcing is the idea that a company will subcontract to a third party, usually outside of the US, for various parts of its business structure. An example of this and perhaps the largest source of outsourcing is call centers for tech support, where a company will subcontract to a third party and that party will build up the call center and hire the workers for it. Many people have been affected by outsourcing since it started being used widely in the 1980s, and most would argue that outsourcing is not a good business model, that while it not only negatively affects them, it affects the whole economy. While there are some unmistakable positives to outsourcing, I would argue that as a whole, the negatives far outweigh the positives and outsourcing is bad for the United States.
Kibbe, C. (2004). Outsourcing: the good, the bad and the inevitable. New Hampshire business review, 26(14), 1A.
Kibbe, C. (2004, 07 09). Outsourcing: the good, the bad and the inevitable. New Hampshire Business Review, pp. 1A-21A.
Outsourcing is morally wrong, outsourcing is not fair, outsourcing allows for fair taxes to be avoided, only corporations benefit from this practice, outsourcing is contributing to the economy’s fall, and outsourcing is damaging the already damaged economy. There are just too many negative aspects in outsourcing, in the respect that it continues to benefit only particular groups, while the rest are left to unfairly deal with this custom. Outsourcing is having an adverse reaction with the economy; although it may be fine now, it may prove to be a problem in the future.
Outsourcing jobs to foreign countries or offshoring is often viewed as the demise of the American economy. A more accurate view of offshoring is that it is the groundwork for the future of our economy. By enabling businesses to conserve costs, grow and have access to a large untapped pool of talent, offshoring is essentially securing the stability of our economy by securing the vitality of our businesses. In order to remain or become competitive in today's economy, US based companies must outsource jobs to foreign countries.
Outsourcing has become a predominant issue among many domesticated American companies. Unlike the popular opinion which supports outsourcing, transferring American work to foreign countries have serious lasting consequences on the American economy. High unemployment is one of the major contributions that arises from sending manufacturing and labor jobs overseas. The lack of available work has a slippery slope effect on many other occurring problems that Americans face today. With less available work opportunities, many foreign students that complete their graduate coursework often return to their home country, applying their knowledge learned from with the United States. As a result, there is less of a potential employee pool to choose from in a tight market. Outsourcing is popular with American business due to many benefits such as lower wages, low regulatory costs, tax benefits,
Outsourcing may help whatever country the factory is ending up in, but in America, it causes substantial job loss. The US has lost at least six million jobs since 1980, both in manufacturing and white collar work. This causes a mass decrease in the US’s national GDP (Gross Domestic Product) by 18% in the last six or seven decades. People can be fired at any given point to be replaced by someone willing to do the work for less money, making jobs less secure. Reliance on imports increases as the outsourcing does. These are a few of the major issues with globalization (Collins).
Outsourcing is a management strategy that allows companies to optimize the functioning of the organization by focusing on the main line of activity, the core activity of the company. It is one of the driving forces behind the process of fragmentation and specialization of the production process and involves buying intermediate goods or services, which were previously produced inside the firm, from a third party (Görg et al., 2008). While outsourcing is used to be a local or domestic circumstance, technological advances in, for example, transportation methods, allowed firms to be more competitive and detailed with the sale intermediate goods from other countries to another. Outsourcing, while a profitable endeavor for big business, realistically hurts our economy by removing manufacturing jobs, which tend to be well paid, also allows companies to evade their fair share of the tax burden. Small business accounts for the majority of job creation in this country, now. By moving jobs overseas or across the border, families are hit hard because there skills are no longer marketable.