The Idea of Li and Governing

1678 Words4 Pages

Li, or rites, has played an integral part in shaping early Chinese philosophy, though not all philosophers have agreed on its meaning or reason for application. Some will argue that human nature requires us to us Li to be ethical beings, while others believe that Li will teach and mold us into beings that will follow the norms of our society. The three major Confucian philosophers whom used the idea of Li to shape their theories were Confucius, Mencius, and Xunzi. All three of these philosophers used Li to shape their ideal government, but it was Xunzi who would have the most applicable form of an ideal government.
Confucius was alive and teaching during the Spring and Autumn period. The power of the Zhou king was on the decline and the rulers of the varying kingdoms were beginning to search for more power. Confucius sought to create a more stable and “good” way of governing the lands of ancient China. Li, said Confucius, were the rituals that men would practice and adhere by to become a gentlemen. Li was not a universal term, one man's Li would be different from another man's Li depending on their social status and role in society. These actions could range anywhere from “presents of jade and silk”(The Analects, 38), to “ err on the side of frugality than on the side of extravagance”(The Analects, 35). This makes Li very similar to the social norms that we look at today. For example, a Li in our society would be a man holding open a door for a women. The following and understandings of these different rituals would create a sound and stable society for people to live in. Confucius found that if a sound society is to be built, it is not just a few people in the ruling class that needed to follow these rites, but everyone in socie...

... middle of paper ...

...nature. Li was a natural part of humans as Mencius states “Thus we see no man is without a sense of compassion, or a sense of shame”(Mencius, Pg.105). Xunzi saw it differently. Li was not a innate part of humans, but a set of observed actions that humans have the capacity to learn and understand to build a society around.
Xunzi has been compared to Thomas Hobbes on many occasions, while it is safe to compare Mencius to Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Xunzi found that because of humans innate bad nature, a structured and just government must rule people by promoting righteous behavior with not only Li, but also law. Mencius and Confucius instead took the idea of Li and gave it far too much importance. If adherence and understanding of Li were all that was needed to keep a society in check, their well-field system and precious Zhou sage king model were pointless if applied.

Open Document