The Human Rights Act 1998

2103 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Section 3.6 human rights act 1998

The Human Rights Act 1998, under which rights are to be 'brought home' (1), incorporates the rights guaranteed by the European Convention of Human Rights 1950 into domestic law. It appears to raise issues in the UK concerning the separation of power, as it seems to provide the courts news powers that dispute Parliament sovereignty and the executive on a certain level. This essay is going to discuss the scope of the judiciary power through the content of HRA 98, then through the competing rights concerning privacy and press freedom and finally through the ones concerning fair trial and freedom of expression.

Section 3 of HRA 98 states that: 'So far as it is possible to do so, primary legislation and subordinate legislation must be read and given effect in a way which is compatible with the convention rights.' It applies to primary legislation and subordinate legislation whenever enacted. Also the duty is applied to all courts. This is a major change, as (the) judge's basic role was to interpret legislative statutes according to Parliament's will and no other authority.(2) Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza (2004)(3) case deals with homosexual partner's right to inherit the tenancy of the deceased. Previous to the enforcement HRA 98, the judgment would have been similar to Fitzpatrick's case (4) that provides that in the Rent Act 1977, the definition of family do not include same-sex relationship. Thus, a homosexual partner is not consider(ed) as spouse or as part of the family, and can't inherit the tenancy of the deceased partner. But in the present case as the tenant died after the HRA 98 came into force, applying such a decision would have been contrary to article 14 of the Convention, when read along with article 8. Indeed, the sta...

... middle of paper ...

..." (2013). Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works. Paper 1168. accessed on 18/04/2014

HL Debates, Vol. 229, col. 638

Home Office, Rights Brought Home : The Human Rights Bill, Cm 3782

Press Gazette, 'Society of Editors: Paul Dacre's speech in full' (9 Nov 2008)< http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/node/42394>accessed on 20/04/14

TABLE OF CASES

Argyll v Argyll [1965] 1 All ER 611

Associated Provincial Picture House LTD v Wednesbury Corporation (1948) 1 KB 223

Attorney General v Davey; Beard (2013) EWHC 2317

Campbell v MGN Ltd (HL) [2004] 2 AC 457

Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association [1999] 4 All ER

Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza (2004) [2004] UKHL 30

Kaye v Robertson and Another (1991) FSR 62

TABLE OF STATUTES

European Convention of Human Rights 1950

Human Right Act 1998

Rent Act 1977

Show More
Related

  • 31st Amendment to the Constitution

    2234 Words  | 5 Pages

    Article 42A.1°1- This article relates to the "natural and imprescriptable" rights of all children. It also continues to mention that the state, albeit as far as practicable, will vindicate the rights of all children. G v An Bord Uchtála2 was a case relating to Article 42.5°3 (which will now be deleted and replaced), related to the "natural and imprescriptable" rights of the child which will now be protected under Article 42A.1. This case which concerned the rights of an unmarried mother saw the Supreme Court trying to expand the rights provided for under the now replaced article with no real continuity. The previous article relating to this placed no real emphasis on State intervention except in exceptional circumstances which will now be changed following the addition of the amended articles. Another interesting aspect of this amended article is the reference to "all children". Previously marital families enjoyed a specific set of rights and it was permissible to discriminate in favour of marital families in some cases. This discrimination arises from the protection offered under Article 41.3.2°4,_________________________________________________...

    Read More

  • Parliamentary Sovereignty and Jackson v. Attorney General

    1950 Words  | 4 Pages

    Bamforth,N. Int. Jnl. Of constitutional law. Current issues in United Kingdom constitutionalism: An introduction 2011 9 (1) 79-85 doi: 10.1093/icon/mor029 (Date of Access: 12/12/11)

    Read More

  • The Ontario Human Rights Commission (OHRC)

    1454 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Ontario Human Rights Commission (OHRC) is an acclaimed organization that prevents discrimination through educating and promoting human rights in Ontario (OHRC, About the Commission). Their goal is for each individual in Ontario be valued; so that everyone can participate and feel they are an important part to the community while being respected and treated with dignity. As well, they make sure each individual take responsibility for the rights of others, so human rights can be achieved by all (OHRC, About the Commission). OHRC accomplishes this through wide range of educational activities and partnership initiatives to promote code violations and advancement of human rights and reduce discrimination, to decrease the occurrence of formal human rights complaints (OHRC, Public Education). Their website provides the public with access to a wide array of information and educational resources. OHRC provides educational sessions to employers, unions, professional associations, community organizations and other groups who are partners with them to develop a culture of human rights (OHRC, Public Education). While decreasing the occurrence of formal human rights complaints, they maintain fair hiring and employment practices and also encourages diversity in the workforce and they do not tolerate any form of discrimination or harassment in the workforce. (OHRC, Employment) When the OHRC deliver services to the public they make sure to be responsive to the diversity of the population served, and stay fair to each person, and their right to be free from discrimination by keeping them informed always (OHRC, Our Commitment to Service). Section 30 of the Ontario Human Rights Code allows OHRC to prepare, approve and publish human rights policie...

    Read More

  • Four Human Rights Myths Summary

    492 Words  | 1 Pages

    In “Four Human Rights Myths” Susan Marks discusses several conceptions (or misconceptions according to her) about human rights. She begins her paper with a case study of the 2011 London riots and how distinctively different is their coverage by the British prime minister and two scholars.

    Read More

  • The Human Rights Act of 1998

    2462 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Human Rights Act of 1998 was co-founded upon the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 1950. Developed following the ending of the Second World War, European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) was constructed to further the idealistic principles and endeavours of equality among all human beings, as well as a devout declaration of preventing the reoccurrence of the holocaust and massacres which have occurred as a casus belli . ECHR comprises civil privileges and liberties fundamental to all human beings irrespective of race, gender, age, sexual orientation exclusive of discrimination. The UK government have promptly endorsed the ECHR, recognising the need of ...

    Read More

  • The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

    2464 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms was signed into law by Queen Elizabeth II April 17, 1982. Often referred to as the Charter, it affirms the rights and freedoms of Canadians in the Constitution of Canada. The Charter encompasses fundamental freedoms, democratic rights, mobility rights, legal rights, language rights and equality rights. The primary function of the Charter is to act as a regulatory check between Federal, Provincial and Territorial governments and the Canadian people. Being a successor of the Canadian Bill of Rights that was a federal statute, amendable by Parliament, the Charter is a more detailed and explicit constitutional document that has empowered the judiciary to render regulations and statutes at both the federal and provincial levels of government unconstitutional. Although the rights and freedoms of Canadians are guaranteed, Sections one and seven of the Charter permit the federal and provincial governments to limit the rights and freedoms enjoyed by Canadians. Section one of the Charter designated ‘Rights and freedoms in Canada’ states “The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.” This section is frequently referred to and better known as the reasonable limits clause. The second rights and freedoms limiting section of the Charter, known as the ‘notwithstanding clause’ is Section thirty-three entitled ‘Exception where express declaration’ declares

    Read More

  • The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

    1627 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms was enacted under the Pierre Trudeau government on April 17, 1982. According to Phillip Bryden, “With the entrenchment of the Charter into the Canadian Constitution, Canadians were not only given an explicit definition of their rights, but the courts were empowered to rule on the constitutionality of government legislation” (101). Prior to 1982, Canada’s central constitutional document was the British North America Act of 1867. According to Kallen, “The BNA Act (the Constitution Act, 1867) makes no explicit reference to human rights” (240). The adoption of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms significantly transformed the operation of Canada’s political system. Presently, Canadians define their needs and complaints in human rights terms. Bryden states, “More and more, interest groups and minorities are turning to the courts, rather than the usual political processes, to make their grievances heard” (101). Since it’s inception in 1982 the Charter has become a very debatable issue. A strong support for the Charter remains, but there also has been much criticism toward the Charter. Academic critics of the Charter such as Robert Martin believe that the Charter is doing more harm than good, and is essentially antidemocratic and UN-Canadian. I believe that Parliament’s involvement in implementing the Charter is antidemocratic, although, the Charter itself represents a democratic document. Parliament’s involvement in implementing the Charter is antidemocratic because the power of the executive is enhanced at the expense of Parliament, and the power of the judiciary is enhanced at the expense of elected officials, although, the notwithstanding clause continues to provide Parliament with a check on...

    Read More

  • Cameron's Crusade

    1758 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...dibility. More than this, he speaks as one who has “been there.” As Hannan wrote in a Telegraph News Blog on the 14th of June, 2010: “I’m working in your future and, believe me, you won’t like it.” There is the real sense that he writes not to provide a historical essay, but as a warning to those who have yet to go as far down the same road as his country. His use of rhetoric is not an exercise in academia, but rather a means to convey his impassioned view as forcefully as he can.

    Read More

  • Human Rights By John Tasioulas

    1991 Words  | 4 Pages

    John Tasioulas introduces the idea that human rights are explained by the morals that humans possess through understanding of human dignity. He explains that are three connections that human dignity has to human rights. The first connection presented is that human dignity and rights are rarely distinguished between due to having virtually the same standards in regards to them. The second that dignity is a starting point in moral grounds that human rights build off of. And last, that the idea that human rights are justified by dignity, saying dignity is the ideal basis for human rights. Tasioulas chooses to focus on the last point, that it is our morals that bring about human rights and that our morals come from humans having dignity. The key thing being that human dignity is something that all possess by simply being human beings there is no merit in achievement or by what legislation or social position can give us.

    Read More

  • Philip Glass: Music Composer

    980 Words  | 2 Pages

    O’Mahony, John. “When less means more.” The Guardian. Guardian News and Media, 23 Nov. 2001. Web. 14 Apr. 2014.

    Read More

  • Parliamentary Sovereignty Essay

    968 Words  | 2 Pages

    Dicey described Parliamentary supremacy, he stated that "Parliament" has "the right to make or unmake any law whatever; and further, that no person or body is recognised by the law of England as having a right to override or set aside the legislation of Parliament,”. The doctrine of Parliamentary sovereignty is centeral to the constitution, however, there are many constitutional intruments as shown in the judgement by the Supreme Court in R(HS2 Action Alliance), including the European Communities Act 1972 and the Human Rights Act 1998 and the 1911 and 1949 Parliament Acts that can be seen to limit this sovereignty. In this essay I will discuss how the implementation of these statutes can be seen to have the ability to overpower original

    Read More

  • Universal Declaration of Human Rights

    1354 Words  | 3 Pages

    113-117 Human Rights: Politics and Practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

    Read More

  • Are Human Rights Universal?

    1599 Words  | 4 Pages

    There have been individuals and even countries that oppose the idea that human rights are for everybody. This argument shall be investigated in this essay, by: exploring definitions and history on human rights, debating on whether it is universal while providing examples and background information while supporting my hypothesis that human rights should be based on particular cultural values and finally drawing a conclusion. A general definition of human rights is that they are rights and freedoms to which all humans are entitled, simply because they are human. It is the idea that ‘all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.’

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Jeff Dudgeon And The Prohibition Of Discrimination

    935 Words  | 2 Pages

    Michael T. Mcloughlin described the case best in Crystal or Glass?: A Review of Dudgeon v. United Kingdom on the Fifteenth Anniversary of the Decision (1996), "I have concluded that Dudgeon v. United Kingdom is a milestone in the history of both the European lesbian and gay civil rights movement, through the establishment of a minimum standard beyond which gay and lesbian rights may not erode" (p. 1). Though the ruling is limited and does not include other basic rights (such as marriage) for the LGBTQIA+ community, it sets the standard for the treatment of this minority group around the world. It limits the efforts governments can take to suppress homosexuality. This topic was not addressed in the original writing of the European Court of Human Rights, which makes this even more important. The court validated a new interpretation of the treaty and set a precedent for the treatment of the LGBTQIA+ community. This alone makes it one of the most important cases ever ruled on. It changed the landscape of how the LGBTQIA+ community would be treated throughout the

    Read More

  • Ethics in the Modern World

    1524 Words  | 4 Pages

    In 1948 the Universal Declaration of Human rights were devised (UDHR). Everyone has the right to liberty, life, freedom from fear and violence. The obligation to protect individuals and groups the States is required to shield them against human rights abuses (United Nations 2013) The Human Rights Act became effective in the UK in 2000. The purpose of the Human Rights Act is t...

    Read More

More about The Human Rights Act 1998

Open Document