Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Conceptual framework
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Conceptual framework
The concepts we as human beings have developed regarding perspectives of one’s own body have never remained static and universal. Our species is enduring the constant struggle for striving to know the processes of the human body and how they relate to our views of the meaning of life and subsequent death. The contemporary era of modern biomedicine is an amalgamation of the concepts of Cartesian duality proposed by René Descartes (1596 - 1650). According to Sheper-Hughes and Lock (1987) this separation of the palpable, organic body from the intangible, intellectual mind allowed for the pursuit of biomedical study and materialist doctrine adopted by Western medical practice. These epistemological concepts of the human body then perpetuate society’s interest, no longer in the separation of mind and body, but in preserving the mind beyond the limits of the physical body, and treating the body merely as a vessel that can be likened to a machine (Helman 2007). As this body perception model progresses, and we as persons view our body as being composed of ‘parts’ that can be replaced, scientists continue to develop new ways of transplanting organic tissues and cells. One such theory of the variety of techniques include cryopreservation, a branch of cryobiology that focuses on the utilization of extremely low temperatures to preserve whole organic tissues or cells (Kaiser, 2002). In discussions of the future of our epistemological views of definitions of self and body as well as progression of technological biomedicine, one can only speculate, basing their propositions on a lower branch of cryobiology, cryonics. Gordon (1975) describes cryonics as the study involved in the application of cryopreservation techniques to preserve the neural t...
... middle of paper ...
...5.
Helman, Cecil G. (2007) The Body: Cultural Definitions of Anatomy and Physiology. Culture, Health and Illness. Hodder Arnold. 19-51.
Hughes, James J. (2001). The Future of Death: Cryonics and the Telos of Liberal Individualism. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 6. 1-30.
Kaiser, Jocelyn (2002). New Prospect for Putting Organs on Ice. Science, 295(5557). 1015.
Lehr, Herndon B. (1971). The Preservation of Tissues and Organs. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 115(4). 274-275.
Scheper-Hughes, & N. Lock, M.M. (1987). The Mindful Body: A Prolegomenon to Future work in Medical Anthropology. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 1(1). 296-315.
Scotter, A.J. et al. (2006). The Basis for Hyperactivity of Antifreeze Proteins. Cryobiology, 53. 229-239.
Silberner, J. (1986). Putting Human Tissue under Glass. Science News, 129(21). 326.
As an extension to the short story “Where am I?” by Daniel Dennett, Dennett is taking the government to court, claiming that NASA owes him a new body, because he is currently forced to share his body with another person (Hubert). Wanting to make usage of my philosophical expertise, the government called upon me to give my recommendation to the court as to what validity, if any Dennett’s claim has, and whether or not Dennett should be awarded a second body transplant. After careful consideration on various philosophical issues pertaining to this case, I have concluded that there is absolutely some merit to Dennett’s claim, and that Daniel Dennett should be given a new body. I will expand upon the details of each specific issue that I investigated,
Considering the arguments from Plato’s Phaedo argue: “Death is not the end and we ought not fear it.” Souls are immortal and continue to live after the body has died. The theories of recollection and opposites are sensible and Socrates can justify them.
De Spelder and Strickland (1983) say that the understanding of death is communicated through the process of socialization by which children learn the concepts and conversations that have value in modern society (p.64). Geoffrey Goer believes that there is evidence to suggest that death has become a taboo and has replaced sex as the unspoken subject of today’s society. Goer says children “are initiated in their early years to love (the concept of sex); But they no longer see their grandfather and express astonishment, they are told that he is resting in a beautiful garden among the flowers” (Walter, p.92-3, 1991). In this essay I will discuss whether death is what Geoffrey Goer suggests, a ‘taboo’ subject within Western Society. Firstly, I will outline what I mean by the terms ‘death’ and ‘taboo’, after which I will place reasons why academics find death to be tabooed and why some argue why death is not tabooed subject. Finally from the analysis of these arguments, I will propose from the evidence, whether in fact death is actually ‘tabooed’.
Cryonics is the process of freezing body parts and organs for future use. At this time they are doing whole body and neurosuspensions. As soon as heartbeat and breathing in a member who has paid for this procedure cease, a transport team from Alcor takes over the care of the patient. Circulation and breathing are artificially restored and the patient is cooled and transported to Alcor's facilities. The patient is treated with drugs to minimize freezing injury and is then further cooled to the boiling point of liquid nitrogen (-320°F, -196°C) (Alcor, 1). Neurosuspensions are the freezing of the human head and brain. The reason for doing this is because it is much cheaper and they feel that all other body parts are replaceable by transplant. Alcor charges $50,000 for neurosuspensions and $120,000 for whole body suspensions (Alcor, 27).
Death is the equalizer of all life. Throughout time people have constructed death in many different ways. For ancient civilizations, such as Mesopotamia, Egypt, Ugarit, Greece, and Rome, death consisted of burial rituals and practices, the construction of monuments, murals, and stele, and offering libations to the dead. These civilizations shared many aspects in their perceptions of death and the afterlife, but those perceptions also varied enough to be individualistic and unique to each civilization. Among the many differences between civilizations’ perceptions, some of the variations involved the location of graves, the type of monuments constructed, the structure of the funeral, and preparation of the dead body for the funeral. The relationship
Alfred Lord Tennyson (1809-1892) and Emily Dickinson (1830-1886) are two of the most well known poets of the 19th century. Tennyson, described as “the leading poet of the Victorian Age” and Dickinson, described as “one of America’s greatest poets” both won most of acclaim thanks to their strong ideas on death. Death is a common theme in any eras but it took a particular significance in the 19th century , especially in literature. As intense poets, both Dickinson and Tennyson shared their innermost views regarding death, particularly seen in Tennyson’s “Mariana”, “Crossing the Bar” and Dickinson’s “Because I could not stop for death” and “Behind me—dips Eternity.”
The essay will critically analyse theoretical accounts of society, in particular how useful they are in understanding how death is viewed socially in the West. It will be argued that all different theoretical models of society can be useful, but that the model ‘society as an organism’, which emphasises symbolic interactionism, is often more useful than structural functionalism on its own. My analysis will start with a look a critique of structural functionalism, using Durkheim’s analysis of suicide (1953) as an example. I then look at ‘society as an organism’ in the thought of Rousseau (1913), before turning to consider these models specifically in relation to the problem of death. I discuss our Western fear of death, and suggest, drawing on Eagleton (2003), that any solution must involve facing this fear on a social level.
'In ancient societies preparations for death were as important to people as planning for life'
Human beings often have preconceived notions or fears regarding the abstract idea of death. Two Hellenistic philosophers Epicurus and Epictetus take very different approaches to prove that death is insignificant and nothing to worry about. Epicurus argues that death is the unequivocal end of our existence, and Epictetus claims it is something that we have no control over. Both examine the nature of death in an attempt to achieve ataraxia or a tranquil state of mind. However, Epicurus and Epictetus fail to address the true emotional nature of death and its impact on the human psyche. Accepting these philosophies requires an inherent selfishness that cannot possibly lead to achieving a tranquil and essentially good life.
This is one of the most controversial topics that humans have been facing it for decades. I’m a believer that humans are body and spirit, and the spirit has to transcend. Religion plays a big part of who we are, how we make some decisions. It affects the way people look and live their lives, communicate with others, and how they act. As mentioned in our book, we have a system of ethical and religious beliefs and values that is transmitted to us by family members, friends, educators, religious figures, etc. This system determines our ability to resolve dilemmas and make complex ethical decisions. (Muller, 2014) I was raised Catholic and I believe that my faith and Christian principles has helped me become a better person, thought me to see
It is just a fact we all must die! Some of us are afraid of the uncertainty that death brings. Therefore, it is regarded as an enemy, a tragedy, and the unavoidable downside of life. Others live day by day knowing that death will come, but they have no fear. They are not in a hurry to meet him, but are making preparations for the encounter. Myself, now that I am old, will be looking forward to the place that I will be going to spend my eternity. I am an eternal being you know. I have heard it is a place I can happily anticipate. I?fm glad because I am very old and feeble.
...ll human organs and the systems that they belong to. "This would be the most revolutionary type of alternative, especially for human related experiments"().
Death is an inevitable part of life and yet, due to lack of experience, the majority of children are uncertain of its meaning. For adults, death is more familiar as they have experienced or witnessed the range of feelings that accompany a traumatic loss - anger, confusion and sadness. As much as adults may try to shelter children from the realities of death, death intrudes into their lives through television, newspapers, radio, and the internet, shaping their perspectives. In the novel “Snowball, Dragonfly, Jew,” Ben’s child perspective of death is shaped by the stylized, intimate and romantic deaths he witnesses in Hollywood movies. While both Ben’s child and adult perspectives of death are displayed in the novel, the comparison between the two suggests that Ben’s child self has a false reality of death, whereas his experienced, adult self, has a full and rational understanding that death does not always happen in the dramatic way he perceived it to as child.
Death is believed to be the end of all and the great equalizer. People accept and reject death for different reasons. “There is conspicuous disagreement about the matter: some people think death is dreadful; other have no objection to death per se, though they may hope their own will be neither premature nor painful.” (Nagel). Which then a question need to be asked is “Is death bad for the one that is in the state of being dead”? Nagel believes that death can be bad for the dead on the assumption that there is no afterlife, death is permanent and you will no longer exist after death. “So death, the most frightening of bad things, is nothing to us; since when we exist, death is not yet present, and when death is present, then we do not
Death is inevitable. As mortal souls, we know that we will be condemned to death. Although, we will never know when it approaches. Death is devious, agonizing, fearful, and inescapable, it is the very thing that can send chills down our spine that makes us cringe. Many of us fear death, because of the things we hear of it or the mental images associated with someone on their death bed suffering in pain. But someone of us has acknowledged that there is no escaping it, and we go into the game knowing what to expect. Over the course of the semester, we’ve read different literary works, in them, we were confronted with characters who had to deal with death, some of whom took their own lives, some who faced their death without fear, and some who have wished for death but did not die. These characters include; Antigone and Haimon, in the play Antigone by Sophocles, Socrates in the Apology by Plato, and Julius Caesar and Brutus in the play Julius Caesar by Shakespeare.