Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
slavery in america
american slavery in the 1800s
american slavery in the 1800s
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: slavery in america
Since the birth of the United States, using the disenfranchised as the primary labor force has been the go-to method for growing and maintaining the economy. Since colonists came to the “New World,” they have used “impure” races to do hard labor and built the world that we live in today off the backs of blacks and American Indians. Even as the country has grown and put into place laws that give non-whites the same rights as whites, the white, privileged rich have always found ways to get around them. The privileged upper-class say that in order to elevate ourselves, we just need to pull ourselves up by our bootstraps like they did, but meritocracy is a myth. At every turn, there have been roadblocks set up to prevent non-whites from gaining half of the success that whites receive.
Some say that poverty exists because a “permissive welfare state has generated a large group of nonparticipants, marginal people, [and] bums” (Blakely and Goldsmith 4). The idea that poverty is a result of people being lazy is a dangerous one, as it allows people to excuse institutional racism as being a figment of one’s imagination. Particularly those who benefit from white privilege do not feel the effects of institutionalized racism and can say that they earned their status on their own. In addition, they believe that because there are middle to upper-class people of color, we live in a post-racial society where anybody can achieve affluence through hard work.
The unofficial tagline of the United States is that it is a land of opportunity, and if you work hard, you will be rich and have everything you ever dreamed of. Education is seen to be the most important part of this idea of meritocracy. If individuals do well in school and pursue a degree in ...
... middle of paper ...
....
Mauer, Marc. Race to Incarcerate. New York: The New Press, 2006. Print.
Tim, Sullivan, et al.. State of the Dream 2012: The Emerging Majority. January 12, 2012. United for a Fair Economy. Web.
Squires, Gregory D. "The Indelible Color Line." American Prospect Jan. 1999: 67- 70. The American Prospect. The American Prospect, 10 Dec. 2010. Web. 21 May 2014.
Weich, Ronald, and Carlos Angulo. "Racial Disparities in the American Criminal Justice System." Rights at Risk: Equality in an Age of Terrorism. Ed.Diane Piche, Ed.William Taylor, Ed.Robin Reed. Citizens' Commission on Civil Rights, 2002: 185-218. Print.
Wooldridge, Adrian. "Ever Higher Society, Ever Harder to Ascend." The Economist (2005): 22-4.
Squires, Gregory D. "The Indelible Color Line." American Prospect Jan. 1999: 67- 70. The American Prospect. The American Prospect, 10 Dec. 2010. Web. 21 May 2014.
America has always seen as the symbolic ideal country of prosperity and equality. This is the reason why people come to America hoping to become successful, but in matter of fact we all have an equal plan field to be successful is not entirely true. For there are social boundaries that keep use limited based upon our own status. Whether we are born of a low class or of a high class the possibility of economic mobility in a sense are predetermined by two factors of social class and success together they both affecting one’s another opportunity of success. In order to achieve success, we must know that it is made up of two main concepts and they are fortune and position. But when a person is limited by their class prohibiting them to achieve success, the point of trying is meaningless. However, there is a way to break the construct that keep groups stuck in the lower-class and is through education. Education gives more opportunities for success to the individuals and since education is very important, culture and the government should focus more directly upon this to reach economic stability. Class standing directly affects economic success in America by limiting a person’s chance of success however; one can overcome by focusing more upon education and culture.
In The Working Poor: Invisible in America, David K. Shipler tells the story of a handful of people he has interviewed and followed through their struggles with poverty over the course of six years. David Shipler is an accomplished writer and consultant on social issues. His knowledge, experience, and extensive field work is authoritative and trustworthy. Shipler describes a vicious cycle of low paying jobs, health issues, abuse, addiction, and other factors that all combine to create a mountain of adversity that is virtually impossible to overcome. The American dream and promise of prosperity through hard work fails to deliver to the 35 million people in America who make up the working poor. Since there is neither one problem nor one solution to poverty, Shipler connects all of the issues together to show how they escalate each other. Poor children are abused, drugs and gangs run rampant in the poor neighborhoods, low wage dead end jobs, immigrants are exploited, high interest loans and credit cards entice people in times of crisis and unhealthy diets and lack of health care cause a multitude of problems. The only way that we can begin to see positive change is through a community approach joining the poverty stricken individuals, community, businesses, and government to band together to make a commitment to improve all areas that need help.
The book two dollars a day by Kathryn Edin is a book that highlights a spiraling poverty in America. One thing I feel contributed to the poverty talked about in the book is some types of American political culture. People in America who are in need of welfare often won’t take it until they have become so impoverished there is no other option due to the stigmas that come with welfare. American political culture also creates a persona for poor people it often paints them as lazy minorities that don’t want to work though they would be capable if they tried too. The pull yourself up by the boot straps mantra only creates more detestation for the poor and impoverished that already don’t seem to fit into the American dream.
The article “As American As Apple Pie” is about, poverty and welfare and how they are looked down upon and treated with suspicion or outright antagonism, and how many associate those in poverty with negative stereotypes often seen as deviant such as homeless, lazy, and criminals. Mark R. Rank points out how poverty across the world is a lot more normal than we think it might be. Some people are at greater risk than others, depending on age, race, gender, family structure, community of residence, education, work skills, and physical disabilities. This article provides the readers with data and analysis of American poverty and welfare over the course of the past 25 years. Rank also talks about how we have framed the poverty issue, and how we should frame it.
The concept of the "working poor" has gained prominence in the post-welfare reform era. As welfare rolls shrunk, the focus shifted from the dependent poor to the working poor. It was obvious that without substantial outside support, even families with full-time low-wage workers were still earning less than the official poverty line. And while American society purports that anyone can prosper if they work hard enough, it became apparent that with inadequate opportunity or bad luck, a growing number of families could not attain the American dream, or even break the cycle of poverty. The new challenge for American social policy is to help the working poor lift themselves out of poverty. That's why progressives who supported ending welfare as we know it have set a new goal -- the government should "make work pay" so that no one who works full time is poor.
The ideal concept of American society is one in which all of the citizens are treated equal in all every realm and situation. Class, race or gender does not divide the utopian America; everyone is afforded the same opportunities and chances for success. In this chimerical state Americans are able to go as far as their dreams allow and with hard work and perseverance any thing is possible. Many Americans subscribe to this pluralist view of the Country, believing that within our democratic system it is the majority who maintains control and sets policy. Unfortunately this idyllic country does not exist nor has it ever existed. America is made up of distinct social classes and the movement within those classes is for the most part, limited to the various classes in the middle where the lines of demarcation are blurred. Although the majority of the Country's population would attest to the myth that America is a classless society, the distinctions definitely exist and influence the entire life scope of most Americans. Housing, health care, education, career prospects and social status are all dependent on the amount of wealth one has and their class standing. Our system needs the built in inequities of the class system in order to perpetuate itself and the upper class needs to have their interests as the dominant determiner of corporate and governmental power and policy.
How to get a better life in the future? Literally to get a better life one has to get through education. This process takes about sixteen years to complete, but when someone joins this process they have to follow the U.S. education system. Education in the United States has been following one idea that comes from a foreign region “The Prussians”. It has been evolving over the years and it has remained adjoining new ideas. Some of these new ideas involve many circumstances which have changed the concept of education. In “Entitlement Education” Daniel Bruno suggests that education has been overall cheating students, and that it is competitive to graduate and to get a job; also, in “What is Education?,” Petra Pepellashi states that education would have been better with Thomas Jefferson’s model of critical thinking rather than the Prussian model way of respecting authority. Above all, education remains competitive, and it continues cheating students because of the usage of the Prussian model rather than Thomas Jefferson’s vision.
Despite this, there continue to be incidents where middle class people are devastated when unable to achieve the so-called American Dream. Of course, the social expectations of a society are generally set by the previous generation and cause the newer generation to feel guilt when they cannot meet them. In order to avoid this feeling of guilt and insufficiency, people are willing to give up their unique hopes and goals; thus creating a people that are cohesively identical. Students in today’s universities are amazingly bright and creative, yet change their majors to those society has placed honor on, such as medicine, law, and engineering. The amount of innovation and invention
(Blumenfeld, 2014) Also, Nicholas Kristof has pointed out “the best escalator to opportunity in America is education.” (Kristof, 2014) However, the reality of education situation showed in Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (O.E.C.D.) survey presented that the current percentage of education is less than the percentage in our parent’s generation. (Kristof, 2014) Ironically, though the elementary and secondary education in America is universal, the quality of education prevents those talent children from advancing in knowledge, which make their way to realizing American Dream is a limit to sports and entertainment fields. (Blumenfeld, 2014) Furthermore, not only Americans are chasing American Dream, but also the international students filled with the education goal of American Dream, which make the competition of degree in a college or university more complicated. (Blumenfeld,
A high school education is no longer sufficient to succeed in America’s increasingly complex economy. However, because of the high price point of a college education, far too many Americans are unable to afford education beyond high school. As shown in the graph below, the higher level of education received greatly increases the chances for employment and also dramatically increases the average salary potential of an individual.
America was once known as a land of opportunity and prosperity. Now we are seeing that upward mobility is increasingly rare in the US. In fact, many Northern and Western European nations provide greater opportunity than the US. Despite this, many Americans continue to believe that social class is determined by hard work. 69% of Americans in a survey agreed that people are rewarded for intelligence, skill, and effort (139). This is obviously not the case, or millions of Americans would not be in the situation they’re in today. For instance, Terry Neumann strived to find full time work, but she could not afford her house after years of part time jobs and her divorce. The Stanley’s were also very hardworking, but stayed in their class. After years of work from both Jackie and Claude, they still had to put Keith’s college tuition on a credit card. Both of the families illustrate the challenge of upward mobility and America’s declining prosperity.
Politics and business influence have been a long term problem for the establishment of a free and fair education opportunity. America has been called ?the melting pot? of the world, meaning that within the nation live such an abundance of individuals from different aspects of life. Within the world, we find some societies less fortunate than other societies. Economic diversity is present within the United States as well. It is commonly understood that the wealthy are becoming better educated than the poor, and similarly that the wealthy have a better chance to survive in the economic growth of today?s society.
Americans like to think that with work comes financial success, and that those who have low incomes are simply lazy or not working as hard as they could, but by looking at the Missing Class we know that this is not so. Sometimes the situation you are born into decides what the rest of your life will be like, and if America is meant to be a land of equality where everyone has a chance to succeed then benefits need to be given to those unlucky enough to be born lower on the social and economic ladder. If the problems of the Missing Class are not addressed and resolved then the problems will only grow and continue, leaving a large part of America only barely getting by.
Do the poor in this country have a choice not to be poor? Do the less fortunate have the same access to opportunities as the middle and upper classes? Do government programs designed to help the impoverished actually keep them in the lower ranks? These are all difficult and controversial questions. Conservatives and Liberals constantly battle over these issues in our state and federal governments. Local and national news media provide limited insight to the root causes and effects of the nation’s poor. There is obviously no simple solution to resolve the plight of these often forgotten citizens. Most of us associate poor as being in a class below the poverty line. In fact there are many levels of poverty ranging from those with nothing, to those with enough to survive but too little to move up. I believe many of our nation’s poor are so by their own doing. I will share observations and personal experiences to support the argument that being poor often is a result of individual choice. One needs merely inspiration and perspiration to move up the socio-economic ladder in the United States. We live in the land of opportunity where anyone with the drive and determination to succeed often can.
My journey through academic life has been an unusual one, full of what many would call “educational taboos.” From first grade all the way through ninth, I was homeschooled, taught in my home in the countryside and far away from most any human interaction besides that of my family and my church. My educational experiences were unique to say the least, but I believe that without them, I wouldn’t be at Colgate University today. Meritocracy, the “myth that the system distributes resources—especially wealth and income—according to the merit of individuals (McNamee)”, and its basis in exceptional abilities, was non-essential for most of my life and I believe it gave me an advantage: I was not learning for advancement or awards, but for my own satisfaction and to satiate my hunger for knowledge.