How Miller Presents the Relationship of John and Elizabeth Proctor in ‘The Crucible’

2531 Words6 Pages

In the Crucible by Arthur Miller, the relationship between John and Elizabeth Proctor is not very clear as they both have a very tempestuous relationship in the first act with each other during the play. Therefore it is very difficult to assess what relationship that they had with each other before.

Miller wrote the play to compare what was happening in the 1950’s at that time with what had occurred in the Salem witch hunts. Arthur Miller’s ‘The Crucible’ was written so that people at the time could relate what had happened in Salem with the McCarthyism happening at that time. The McCarthyism era was when the Un-American Activities Committee was at power and punished civilians who were accused as communists. The events that happened at the two periods of time were similar as people were naming other innocent individuals to try and get out of trouble and this unfortunately led to the phenomenon in both Salem and in 1950s America.

In the beginning of the play John is described as a ‘well respected’ and an ‘even feared’ man in Salem and shows that he is a man of ‘great power’ and ‘authority’. However, at the back of this ‘great power’ and ‘respect’ in the middle of Act 1 when we realise that John has had an affair with Abigail. "Abby, I may think of you softly from time to time. But I will cut off my hand before I'll ever reach for you again. Wipe it out of mind. We never touched, Abby" (Page 18).This quote shows us that they had an affair and that John is trying to forget about this and make his marriage stronger with Elizabeth.

John’s adultery is one of the main problems why they both did not get along very well as Elizabeth kept on questioning him which John was not ready to answer. (Page 45 – Act 2)

Proctor: You will not ju...

... middle of paper ...

... the point she is making as she is expressing her emotions. “(through her weeping): Aye.” (Page 47 – Act two). But Proctor is not sure whether to believe this or not as he is a ‘strong minded’ person as Miller described when he was introduced. But Mary gives her false excuse which increases the drama even further reaching close to the peak climax in Act two. To backup what Mary had just stated, she creates another point to justify her previous point. Proctor still doesn’t seem to be sure if he should believe what Mary is saying and asks: “Why? What did she do to you?” (Page 47 – Act two), and Mary replies without any hesitation.

At a point Elizabeth has a valid argument to make but Mary interrupts her to make another point about the commandments. Proctor still doesn’t believe there’s enough proof to hang her. “But the proof, the proof!” (Page 48 – Act 2) Proctor

Open Document