The Horrors of Animal Experimentation

877 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Animal experiment ethical issue

What animals endure in laboratories is horrific and sickening. Animals should not have to suffer this much for unreliable experiments. They are not lab equipment that can just be thrown away. Animals are still living beings and deserve to at least live out their life. Activists of animal experimentation say that most experiments are not painful to animals, which is far from true. There is no law restricting the use of animals for experimentation. The only law today governing cruelty of animals is the Animal Welfare Act. This law allows animals to be used in all experiments even if they are painful or kill millions of animals. This law gives laboratories the right to burn, shock, poison, starve, restrain, force drugs in, and create brain-damage to animals. Even worse, painkillers are not required at all. In fact, because of the cost of painkillers and the number of animals laboratories use. Almost no labs use painkillers at all (“Animal Testing is Bad Science”). This exemplifies the freedom given to laboratories to hurt and torture animals. Many people are mislead into thinking there are restrictions for the type of tests done to animals for experimentation. In reality, laboratories have total freedom. The Animals Welfare Act even states animal experimentation can happen in the name of science. In addition, animals do not have to be under anesthesia in order to perform experiments. Painful tests are excruciating to the welfare of the animals health. The level of harm inflicted on the animals is not even discussed. One of the most common and cruel tests done in labs is the LD 50.

The LD stands for “Lethal Dose” and 50 is the percent of animals poisoned in the test. In this test, any type of animal is used (usually dogs, or mice) ...

... middle of paper ...

...f Injury, Illness & Disease on Live Animals & Humans; ‘animal Research’, ‘animal Tests’, ‘animal Experiments.’” DOCTORS AGAINST VIVISECTION Animal Research Tests Experiments. N.p., n.d. Web. 03 Feb. 2014.

Ruesch, Hans. 1000 Doctors (and many more) Against Vivisection. N.p.: Hans Ruesch Foundation, 1989. Vivisection Research. Web. 4 Feb. 2014. .

Singer, Peter. The Animal Liberation Movement: Its Philosophy, Its Achievements, and Its Future. Nottingham, England: Old Hammond, 1986. Animal Liberation Movement. Web.

“Top Five Reasons to Stop Animal Testing.” PETA Top Five Reasons to Stop Animal Testing Comments. PETA, n.d. Web. 11 Feb. 2014.

“Vivisection:Outdated, Cruel, and Unnedcessary.” Massachusetts Animal Rights Coalition. massanimalrights, n.d. Web. 13 Feb. 2014. .

Show More
Related

  • Testing on Animals: Behind the Eight Ball

    1429 Words  | 3 Pages

    “Frequently Asked Questions." The Truth About Vivisection. In Defense of Animals, n.d. Web. 26 Mar. 2014.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: We Must Eliminate Animal Testing

    613 Words  | 2 Pages

    There is a moral blind spot in the treatment of animals that enable us to justify the cruelties for the perceived benefits of humans. Animals are living things. They have lungs which breathe, hearts which beat, and blood that flows. In fact, animals sense of smell, sight, and sound is much more acute than our own. Therefore, we can assume that their sensitivity to pain is at least equal to ours. According to Hippocrates, “The soul is the same in all living creatures, although the body of each is different.” This can go with the Duty Theory that states that every individual gets treated the same. The intentions of animal testing is not to harm the animals, but that is exactly what it does.

    Read More

  • Michael Hanlon's Vivisection Is Right?

    884 Words  | 2 Pages

    Michael Hanlon claims vivisection is right by formulating his argument about animal in the laboratory live better lives and better deaths than animals in poultry farming and cosmetic testing. Poultry farming is the practice of raising chickens, pigs, and lambs exclusively in a cage that animals live until ready for consumption. Hanlon attempts to justify vivisection with the use of pathos by painting a vivid picture about animals in laboratories lead better lives and better deaths than poultry farming animals (2). However, all animals tested in experiments or raised for food are

    Read More

  • Animal Shelters and the No Kill Movement

    977 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Web. 26 Jan. 2014. http://www.examiner.com/article/the-truth-about-no-kill-animal-shelters>. No Kill Advocacy Center -. No Kill Quick Facts.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing Cruel And Inhumane

    532 Words  | 2 Pages

    Over 100 Million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned and abused in testing labs every year. Animals are used to test the safety of products, advance scientific research, and develop models to study disease and to develop new medical treatments, all for the sake of mankind. Animals should not be used for scientific research because animal testing is inhumane, other testing methods now exist, and animals are very different from human beings. While animal testing has led to many life-saving cures, animal testing is cruel and inhumane because it involves inflicting pain and harm on the test subject to study its effects and remedies. Testing involves physically restraining, force-feeding, and depriving animals of food and water.

    Read More

  • Essay On Animal Rights And Vivisection

    1015 Words  | 3 Pages

    Vivisections, medical research that harms the research subject without providing any benefits to them, is supported by philosophy professor R.G Frey on the basis that the using and killing of animals is morally permissible because humans' quality of life exceeds animals' quality of life. Frey does not disregard the fact that vivisections harm animals, he sees no difference in the pain felt by humans and animals; nonetheless, Frey does not believe that all members of the moral community have lives of equal value. He believes that sacrificing the lives of those with less value is better than sacrificing the lives of those with higher values. Therefore, Frey defends the act of vivisections on the basis that humans' lives are of greater moral value

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Animals

    1436 Words  | 3 Pages

    For thousands of years scientist have been performing vivisections on animals to find information on new chemicals, drugs, and vaccines. Vivisection is when scientist perform dissections among living animals mostly for the purpose of educating and retrieving information. Experimenting on animals has become the tool that has helped us comprehend the body functions of an animal and how a disease transforms the bodily functions, but over the years it’s caused animal rights activists to question the usefulness and the sincerity of using animals for this purpose. Although animal research has been helpful in the past, it is morally wrong in the sense that experimenting on animals is not the only way to collect information. There are other alternatives

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Animal Experimentation

    1261 Words  | 3 Pages

    Stokes, W.S. “Animals and the 3 R’s on Toxicology Research and Testing.” Human and Experimental Toxicology December 2015: 7. Academic Search Premier. Web. 14 February

    Read More

  • The Harm of Animal Testing

    1115 Words  | 3 Pages

    Clemmitt, Marcia. "Animal Rights." CQ Researcher by CQ Press. N.p., 10 Jan. 2010. Web. 27

    Read More

  • Animal Testing Persuasive Essay

    1010 Words  | 3 Pages

    Each year, millions of animals, ranging from mice to monkeys, suffer through the cruel and inhumane practice of animal testing. Scientist throughout the world are torturing animals for mankind’s own benefit, which is unreliable in most cases. “According to Humane Society International, animals that are used in experiments are commonly subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, the infliction of burns and other wounds to study the healing processes and the infliction of pain to study its effects and remedies.” Although humans often benefit from successful animal research, these animals do not have a voice to say no. The pain, suffering, and deaths inflicted on these animals are not worth the possible human benefits. Scientist test the animals for many products that we humans can use (makeup, medicine, etc.). Many of the items we purchase on a regular basis have been tested on animals first. Most of the animal testing is unreliable.

    Read More

  • The Unseen Cruelty: A Critique on Animal Testing

    1045 Words  | 3 Pages

    One of the largest controversies involving the testing on animals is the harm that is inflicted on them. Proof lies in the many leaked photographs showing the horrific pain that has been forced onto beings that cannot speak for themselves. A test called Lethal Dose 50%, or LD50, is a test to assess cosmetics such as lipstick, nail polish, skin care products, and others. This can leave the rabbits, dogs, mice, or other unfortunate animals left crippled with severe untreated chemical burns. During the assessment of the product the animals are force...

    Read More

  • Argument for Stopping Animal Abuse

    2126 Words  | 5 Pages

    Tom Regan, “The Case for Animal Rights,” in In Defense of Animals, ed. Peter Singer (Oxford:

    Read More

  • Animal Research and Testing, Is it Ethical?

    2169 Words  | 5 Pages

    vivisection Animal Research and Testing, Is it Ethical? “It is a simple fact that many, if not most, of today’s modern medical miracles would not exist if experimental animals had not been available to medical scientists. It is equally a fact that, should we as a society decide the use of animal subjects is ethically unacceptable and therefore must be stopped, medical progress will slow to a snail’s pace. Such retardation will in itself have a huge ethical ‘price tag’ in terms of continued human and animal suffering from problems such as diabetes, cancer, degenerative cardiovascular diseases, and so forth.” Dr. Simmonds, a veterinarian who specializes in the care of laboratory animals, is one of many who believe that animal testing is an ethical practice.

    Read More

  • Pros Of Animal Testing

    434 Words  | 1 Pages

    Over 100 million animals are used in experiments; 95% of these animals end up dying. Animals are killed and mutilated for the sake of science. Some experiments can involve “blinding, severing of limbs, damaging brain, and ingesting various drugs.” (Coster,

    Read More

  • Animal Testing Should be Banned

    1000 Words  | 2 Pages

    Animals are used in research to develop new medicines and for scientists to test the safety of the medicines. This animal testing is called vivisection. Research is being carried out at universities, medical schools and even in primary and elementary schools as well as in commercial facilities which provide animal experiments to industry. (UK Parliament) In addition, animals are also used in cosmetic testing, toxicology tests, “defense research” and “xenotransplantation”. All around the world, a huge amount of animals are sentenced to life in a laboratory cage and they are obliged to feel loneliness and pain. In addition scientists causing pain, most drugs that pas successfully in animals fail in humans. It is qualified as a bad science. Above all, animals have rights not to be harmed even though the Animal Welfare Act does not provide them even with minimal protection. The law does not find it necessary to use current alternatives to animals, even if they are obtainable. Animal testing should be banned due to animal rights, ethical issues, alternative ways and the unreliability of test results in humans.

    Read More

More about The Horrors of Animal Experimentation

Open Document