The History of Animal Experimentation and Testing

Animal testing is a controversial topic with two main sides of the argument. The side apposing animal testing states it is unethical and inhumane; that animals have a right to choose where and how they live instead of being subjected to experiments. The view is that all living organism have a right of freedom; it is a right, not a privilege. The side for animal testing thinks that it should continue, without animal testing there would be fewer medical and scientific breakthroughs. This side states that the outcome is worth the investment of testing on animals. The argument surrounding animal testing is older than the United States of America, dating back to the 1650’s when Edmund O’Meara stated that vivisection, the dissection of live animals, is an unnatural act. Although this is one of the first major oppositions to animal testing, animal testing was being practiced for millennia beforehand. There are two sides apposing each other in the argument of animal testing, and the argument is one of the oldest arguments still being debated today.

The history of animal experimentation and tests, and the argument surrounding it, has an expansive and somewhat extensive history. Some of the first medical research that was conducted on living animals was done by Aelius Galenus, better known as Galen, in the second century C.E. There have been examples of animal testing in earlier dates, but Galen devoted his life to understanding science and medicine, so he is attributed to being the father of vivisection. In the twelfth century, an Arabic physician named Avenzoar introduced animal testing dissections as a means to better understand surgery before preforming the operation on a human patient. Edmund O’Meara made one of the first opposing ar...

... middle of paper ...

...erican Journal of Psychiatry 158.10 (2001): 1587. ProQuest. Web. 19 Apr. 2014.
"Biomedical Research | Animal Use in Research." Biomedical Research | Animal Use in Research. N.p., n.d. Web. 19 Apr. 2014. .
Dawson, Liza. "The Salk Polio Vaccine Trial of 1954: Risks, Randomization and Public Involvement in Research." Clinical Trials1.1 (2004): 122-30. ProQuest. Web. 19 Apr. 2014.
Sun, Shany. "The Truth Behind Animal Testing." Young Scientists Journal 5.12 (2012): 835. ProQuest. Web. 14 Apr. 2014.
Whitmore, William Henry. A bibliographical sketch of the laws of the Massachusetts colony from 1630 to1686 In which are included the Body of liberties of 1641, and the records of the Court of assistants, 1641-1644. Arranged to accompany the reprints of the laws of 1660 and of 1. Boston: Rockwell and Churchill, printers, 1890. Print.