Hines’ Article Triggers Response

1242 Words3 Pages

A journal article’s goal is to inform the reader of a subject, but it also attempts to conjure a response or thought of any kind. “Housing, Baseball, and Creeping Socialism The Battle of Chavez Ravine, Los Angeles, 1949-1959” by Thomas S. Hines causes a reaction from the start by failing to include an abstract to aid the reader. Had I not had a background in Chavez Ravine, this would be a crucial negligence. Once the essay begins, Hines delves straight into Chavez Ravine, the architects behind the housing project there, and the socialist controversy that doomed the project, provoking a number of responses from me ranging from frustration to sympathy.

From the very first sentence, Hines plunges into the article as if the reader already has background information on Chavez Ravine. He mentions the “315-acre parcel of hilly, wooded, and picturesquely ‘rural’ land very near the center of downtown Los Angeles” but he neglects to include why (Hines 123). Since the article includes no abstract, I was left to guess Hines’ purpose of the article. After continuing to describe how the area was to be vacated for new public housing, Hines begins to upset me. Since I have read other articles on Chavez Ravine, I know his information is correct, and it is not difficult to comprehend; however, without a purpose, his writing seems useless. He simply lays out information in chronological order with no direction. His technique does not create suspense or anticipation by leaving out purpose, rather it seems like Hines is rambling by failing to guide his audience.

By giving the biographies of architects Richard Neutra and Robert Alexander, Hines does nothing to remedy his aimless writing. He writes that Neutra had a variety of experience as an archi...

... middle of paper ...

...ich “poignantly publicized the earlier evictions […] [but] remained silent in the later removals” (Hines 141). They should have shown enough pride to admit the effects of their smear campaign.

Hines’ article, though not possessing a clear purpose, provides a thorough history of the entire Elysian Park Heights project. He summarizes Chavez Ravine, the architects and their vision, and the downfall of the project due to fears of socialism and a desire for baseball. Hines’ writing effectively triggers a number of emotions, mainly anger and shock that the situation took place. While he provides no introduction to the reader, by the conclusion, Hines definitely provides reason for response.

Works Cited

Hines, Thomas S. “Housing, Baseball, and Creeping Socialism The Battle of Chavez Ravine, Los Angeles, 1949-1959.” Journal of Urban History, 8.2 (1982): 123-143. Print.

Open Document