Hamlet and His Sanity As Determined in a Court of Law

2481 Words5 Pages

In the court of law, William Shakespeare’s Hamlet will be used as a transcript to determine the fate of Prince Hamlet as he is responsible for the death of Polonius. With the mask of insanity, Hamlet is conscious of his actions as he murders Polonius through his malicious intent upon King Claudius. Also, with Hamlet being in an intense state of emotion during his confrontation of Queen Gertrude, he intentionally murders Polonius upon adequate provocation which results to voluntary manslaughter. However, by pursuing King Claudius, Hamlet endangers himself and those close to him as he relentlessly involves others through his dangerous pursuit. From a legal context, Hamlet is declared sane when he murders Polonius and will be convicted with voluntary manslaughter. With this conviction, Hamlet will serve time in prison as he is a threat to himself and others close to him through his malicious intent and actions to murder King Claudius.
In order to determine the sanity of Hamlet’s mind, there must be a connection between Hamlet’s actions and the elements of the M’Naughten test. Under those circumstances, Hamlet’s results declare him as sane for he does not meet the requirements of the M’Naughten test. According to Samaha, The M’Naughten test is defines insanity as a mental disease that affects his or her capacity to reason that impairs the defendant’s ability to know both the nature and quality of his or her acts and the difference between morally right and wrong (277). However, a mental disease does not affect Hamlet’s reasoning, as it was due to the circumstances he was in. These circumstances initially include the death of King Hamlet and the marriage between King Claudius and Queen Gertrude but later contain the death of others a...

... middle of paper ...

...rrod. Emotions and Culpability: How the law is at odds with psychology, Jurors, and itself. Washington: American Psychological Association, 2006. Print.
Kübler-Ross, Elisabeth and Kessler, David A. On Grief and Grieving: Finding the Meaning of Grief Through the Five Stages. New York: Scribner, 2005. Print.
Posner, Richard A. Law and Literature. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2009. Print.
Prosser, Eleanor. Hamlet and Revenge. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1967. Print.
Samaha, Joel. Criminal Law. California: Wadsworth Publishing Company,2002. Print.
Scofield, Martin. The Ghosts of Hamlet: the play and modern writers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980. Print.
Trial of Hamlet. Boston University, Huntington Theatre Company, Boston Bar Association. 1996. Video
Ward, Ian. Shakespeare and the Legal Imagination. London: Butterworths, 1999. Print.

Open Document