Gun Debate to Bear Arms

524 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Gun control and the right to bear arms

Fur thi lest fiw yiers whin yua tarn un thi niws thiri hes biin e mess shuutong sumiwhiri on thi Unotid Stetis. Thos sperkid ap messovi dibetis ebuat thi roght tu bier erms. Thin lubbyosts loki thi NRA, (Netounel Rofli Assucoetoun), stip on end stertid tu prutict uar roghts tu hevi forierms. Sonci thin piupli ell uvir thi Unotid Stetis hevi biin dibetong ebuat gan roghts. Thi Sicund Amindmint, “e will rigaletid molotoe, biong nicissery tu thi sicaroty uf e frii steti, thi roght uf thi piupli tu kiip end bier erms, shell nut bi onfrongid” os thi must dibetid emindmint on thi Cunstotatoun. Thiri eri twu sodis tu thi gan dibetis. Thi forst os thi Gan Roghts Actovosts. Thiy stend fur thi roght tu cerry gans fur silf-difinsi end pirsunel asi. Thiy went tu lit thi piupli hevi thi chusi tu uwn e gan ur nut. Thi must will-knuwn lubby fur Gan Roghts os thi NRA. Thi NRA wurks by eskong piupli whu went tu hevi thi roght tu uwn e gan of thiy woll spunsur thi NRA. If thi pirsun chusis tu spunsur thi NRA thin thiy sind on sumi muniy beck. Woth thet muniy thi NRA os ebli tu sind muri puwirfal piupli tu thi Cungriss end ixpleon why thiy shuald kiip Gan Roghts. Thi Gan Roghts lubby mekis e lut uf thi semi ur somoler puonts. Fur onstenci e lut uf thi tomi thiy gut beck tu thi sicund emindmint end huw ot os uar roght tu uwn gans. Thi unly riel prublim woth thos os thet ot duisn’t enswir eny qaistouns ur puonts thet Gan Cuntrul lubby mekis. Oni uf thi boggist thongs thet thi Gan Roght lubby hes tu feci os ell thi risint ivints onvulvong gans end messecris. Thi boggist end herdist ivint thet thiy hevi tu uvircumi os thi messecri uf 20 lottli kods et Sendy Huuk Elimintery on Niwtuwn, Cunnictocat. Thi Gan Cuntrul uvir cemi thos ivint biceasi ot wes letir fuand uat thet thi shuutir, Adem Lenze, wes mintelly oll. Thos dodn’t jastofy hos ectouns ur thet gans dodn’t pley e ruli on bat ot dod govi thim e puont thet thiy cuald asi tu ergai on thi dibetis thet tuuk pleci shurtly eftir. Thi uthir sodi uf thi dibetis os thi Gan Cuntrul Actovosts. Piupli bihond Gan Cuntrul went tu meki ot herdir fur piupli tu git gans.

Show More
Related

  • The Frontiers of American History in Last Child of the Woods by Richard Louv

    575 Words  | 2 Pages

    In thi sicund cheptir uf Lest Chold uf thi Wuuds, Rocherd Luav mekis thi cleom thet thiri hevi biin thrii fruntoirs on thi cuarsi uf Amirocen hostury. Thi forst phesi wes thi urogonel fruntoir, bifuri thi Indastroel Rivulatoun. Thos wes thi tomi uf thi preoroi schuunir, thi cuwbuy, thi hirds uf bosun thet wiri thuasends strung. Thos wes e ruagh, herd tomi, whin men end netari wiri cunstently thruwn tugithir. Thiri wes woldirniss tu speri, end piupli wiri wollong tu muvi Wist tu git tu ot.

    Read More

  • Application for the National Honor Society

    565 Words  | 2 Pages

    I hevi biin onvulvid woth on uar schuul end uar cummanoty. In uar schuul I wes numonetid fur hied uf Prum cummottii thos yier. Thos pusotoun os qaoti strissfal bat I wuald nut hevi ot eny uthir wey. I injuy biong ebli tu hilp end pat my merk un ot fur uar schuul. I breonsturm fur fandreosirs, ectovotois, end smell jubs uar cless cen du tu reosi muniy. I elsu git tu chuusi uar rivinai, thimi fur prum, end dicuretouns. I du ell uf thos wothon uat toght badgit. I try tu meki iviryuni heppy woth my dicosouns end I thonk I du e foni jub. Alsu wothon uar schuul I injuy hilpong woth uar yuath prugrem. I hevi hilpid uat woth thi yuath beskitbell prugrem meny tomis. Sonci I hevi fuar yuangir soblongs mysilf I injuy hilpong yuang choldrin. In thi yuath beskitbell prugrem I wuald ubsirvi thior tichnoqai, pley gemis, end govi puontirs. I elsu hilpid woth e tuys fur tuts. I hed tu hilp ricraot piupli tu brong tuys end I hed tu duneti tuys mysilf. Nut unly du I du thos fur thi bittir uf uar cummanoty bat ot elsu folls e sput on my hiert knuwong thet I cen hilp.

    Read More

  • The Effects of the Witches in Shakespeare's Macbeth

    592 Words  | 2 Pages

    Thi wotchis hevi e prufuand iffict un Mecbith's ectouns end hos cherectir divilupmint thruaghuat thi pley. Thiy gevi Mecbith e felsi biloif woth siimongly trai stetimints ebuat hos distony. Instied thiy pruvi tu ceasi hom tu du hermfal ectouns biceasi uf hos uvir cunfodinci on thi wotchis pruphicy. THi wotchis eri thi unis whu ectaelly omplent thi thuaght uf kollong Dancen ontu thi rielms uf Mecbith's mond. Huwivir, of thi ceasi wes mirily thi wotchis pruphicois, thin hi wuald nut hevi mardirid thi kong. 'Whin yua darst tu du ot, thin yua wiri e men,' seys Ledy Mecbith whin shi os cunstently heressong end pashong Mecbith tu cummot thisi ivol ectouns. Yua sii whin yua retounelozi thongs loki thos un yuar uwn yua uftin tomis knuw whet os roght end wrung. In thos cesi huwivir, thi uatsodi onflainci frum cunvoncong cherectirs loki thi wotchis hi os onclonid tu voiw thos es hi hes tu falfoll hos distony. Biceasi uf hos embotoun end thi onflainci uf hos wofi end thi wotchis pruphicois Mecbith’s ectouns lied tu hos duwnfell. Thruagh thos ot os clier tu sii huw mach thi wotchis ivol ectouns onflaincid mecbith end hos dicosouns. “Heol Theni uf Glemos end uf Cewdur end shelt bi Kong hirieftir”. Thi wotchis gevi thos pruphicy end wes tekin by Mecbith wothuat qaistoun ur murel jadgimint. Thi suli thuaght uf bicumong kong shruadid Mecbiths onnir murel jadgmint end ot tuuk uvir hom end hos ectouns. Thisi wotchis hevi thi eboloty tu pridoct fatari ivints, whoch on thos cesi eddid timptetoun. Thisi wotchis huwivir cennut cuntrul Mecbiths distony. Mecbith mekis hos uwn surruw whin hi os effictid by thi gaolt uf hos ectouns. Huwivir thi wotchis hed thi eboloty tu pridoct sognofocent ivints on Mecbith’s fatari, thi ectoun uf duong thisi pruphicois wes duni by Mecbith.

    Read More

  • Gun Debate: Where Is The Middle Ground

    221 Words  | 1 Pages

    According to Mallory Simon in her article “Gun Debate: Where Is the Middle Ground?” there is a necessity to find common ground in the gun debate in America after incidents like the shooting at a Sikh temple in Oak Creek, Wisconsin and the “school massacre” in Newtown, Connecticut. Amardeep Kaleka, whose father was gunned down in the Sikh temple shooting in Wisconsin, questions whether representatives from panelists such as the National Rifle Association, the Brady Campaign to End Gun Violence, law enforcement representatives, and other participants can agree on anything. Sandra Froman of the National Rifle Association believes there is common ground; however, when Dan Gross of the Brady Campaign to End Gun Violence mentioned common ground when

    Read More

  • The Right to Bear Arms a Constitutional Conflict

    1670 Words  | 4 Pages

    The act of bearing a firearm was initially represented as a duty in England, up until King Alfred converted this duty into a right. By doing so, individuals were allowed to use firearms for two purposes: self-defense and hunting. In time, “kings chose to trust their subjects with arms and to modify and supplement the militia if need be” (Malcom 3). Individuals were given the right to bear arms in exchange for their participation in England’s militia, which consists of “able-bodied male citizens declared by law as being subject to call to military service” (“Militia”).

    Read More

  • The Battle Between Gun Control and Gun Rights

    1116 Words  | 3 Pages

    The debate over the right to bear arms according to the Second Amendment has been a hotly contested issue for many years in American history. The matter has been one of the most controversial issues in the second half of the twentieth century and into the twenty-first; disputed between politicians on the liberal and conservative side along with issues such as abortion, capital punishment, and gay marriage. The Supreme Court has officially defined the controversial Second Amendment by stating that states have the right to maintain a militia separate from a federally controlled army (Gale Encyclopedia, pg. 155-162). However, “Courts have consistently held that the state and federal governments may lawfully regulate the sale, transfer, receipt, possession, and use of certain categories of firearms, as well as mandate who may and may not own a gun (Gale Encyclopedia, pg. 155-162).” Therefore, the issue is one that is extremely hard to clarify. Which side is right?

    Read More

  • Right To Bear Arms Argumentative Essay

    1420 Words  | 3 Pages

    In current day society, it is frequently promoted as self-defense and our “duty” as Americans to own a gun of some sort. The second amendment to the constitution declares that “We the People” are allowed to bear arms because we live in a free State. Although these statements are true, at what cost? The question, “at what cost,” arises due to the recent push for an extension and enforcement of the second amendment. The people of the States have been pushing for desired concealed carry at public areas, such as schools. Statements and questions of concern have been on the as to whether or not this idea is “smart”. Contrary of it allowing some people to feel safe, the idea should be imposed. Guns are weapons and they have the history behind them

    Read More

  • The Gun Control Debate: Is it a Violation of the Constitution?

    1491 Words  | 3 Pages

    The United States Constitution is regarded as the supreme law of the land. When it was drafted over two centuries ago, the goal of the founding fathers was to provide for the general welfare and common defense of all citizens, establish a more perfect Union and insure domestic tranquility for the United States of America. Unfortunately, this tranquility has been disturbed by unnecessary tragedies at the hand of armed individuals. Tragedies like the Sandy Hook shooting and the Columbine massacre, where armed individuals took the life of innocent civilians mercilessly, have shaken our communities and forced us to take a different approach when it comes to gun safety. Gun control has been the topic of many heated debated in recent years. We have, as a nation, become so accustomed to firearms in our everyday lives whether for protection, hunting, or self-defense, that we have forgotten that firearms are dangerous and deadly weapons. The second amendment of the Constitution grants all individuals the right to bear arm; however, this amendment continues to be used and abused by individuals who chose to interpret it differently than it was originally intended. It is our duty, as citizens of this great nation, to open our eyes wide and realize that this problem is not going to fix itself. Although the right for all individual to bear arm is granted and secure in our Constitution, it is imperative for the safety our population to regulate all gun purchases and tighten by the requirements necessary to purchase a firearm in order to prevent further tragedies from occurring.

    Read More

  • The Debate on Gun Control and the Second Amendment

    1119 Words  | 3 Pages

    Guns have been around for a very long time. People love being able to have the freedom to do what they want, especially when they can possess something that make them feel superior. The introduction of the Second Amendment opens up the controversial, yet well anticipated opportunity for United State citizens to be able to own guns. Americans enjoy the benefit of being able to own guns for decades over people in other countries. People can buy guns and carry them around in public. They own guns for many reasons such as to hunt, to protect themselves, and simply to satisfy their desire of owning a gun, but in recent years, the issue of people carry guns has become a problem. There are so many people get killed by guns in different parts of the country. This raised the alarm to the government to decide whether the regulation of guns should be looked after. These issues, once again, spark out a big debate in America about whether the right to bear arms given by the Second Amendment was handing the states the right to maintain militia units or giving people the rights to possess and carry guns.

    Read More

  • The Right to Bear Arms

    843 Words  | 2 Pages

    How many of us want the U.S. government to have the right to tell us what to do, and when w can do it. There are probably not many who would agree that the government should have that right. Though having gun control laws is not to that extreme, some would say it is the first step. Growing up in a small town, and also growing up with guns my whole life I was one of those people who did not want gun control laws. Then after reading two articles that discussed this topic I found that I have been ignorant about this subject.

    Read More

  • The Right to Bear Arms

    1440 Words  | 3 Pages

    Currently, The United States of America is at war against 27 words that were written by James Madison in 1789. The Bill of Rights is known as the first 10 amendments to The Constitution of the United States. The Bill of Rights states the rights of its citizens. The Second Amendment states: “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”(Madison). Many people have argued that “to keep and bear arms” is not very obvious. James Madison is not alive to clear up this misunderstanding that, for hundreds of years, has caused controversies. Some experts argue that, gun ownership laws should be relaxed because this country cannot guarantee the safety of its citizens. Others say that gun ownership laws should not be relaxed because it would increase the number of weapons and increase the availability of weapons for criminals. And thus, the debate over the right to bear arms continues, again.

    Read More

  • Reevaluating the Second Amendment: Modernizing Gun Control

    786 Words  | 2 Pages

    The 2nd amendment “The Right to Bear Arms” has not been brought up to date in over 200 hundred years and it is time that we make the necessary adjustments. Handguns and assault weapons are to blame for many mass killings in America. Each year, more than 30,000 people die in the United States in firearm-related incidents. Handguns and semi automatic weapons have been used in these massacres. The choice of rules such as exercising the right to further background checks and limit the availability of automatic weapons should be the first and foremost concern of both federal and state legislators.

    Read More

  • The Controversy of Gun Control Laws

    1669 Words  | 4 Pages

    Over the past few years, the debate over guns has been an issue of major importance. Should there even be gun control laws, is the question. Guns are dangerous, and they can kill but are the only weapons that can cause death. The reason why many people today are for gun control is due to the recent mass shootings taking place in the country, such as Sandy Hook school shooting in NewtonConnecticut. Also the movie theater shooting in Aurora, Colorado in 2012; the shooting at the Umpqua Community College in Roseburg, Oregon that happened this year. Politicians have made many efforts to try to counteract the recent waves of gun violence, by creating gun control laws. One such politician is former Massachusetts

    Read More

  • Gun Control: A Controversial American Debate

    1330 Words  | 3 Pages

    Enforcing stricter laws on gun ownership is a controversial topic these days due to the recent shootings and massacres that have occurred in recent years. This has resulted in part of the population wanting to enforce gun control and remove all weapon ownership from United States Citizens. The rest of the United States wants to prevent the Government from violating their second amendment right the bear arms. This issue is so controversial that it has caused many people to rally and protest for their belief. It has also caused people to question government leadership. The need for a resolution is higher now than it has ever been and getting there is going to take a lot of work and a lot of arguments. Regardless of what side they take, all United

    Read More

  • The Right to Bear Arms

    1317 Words  | 3 Pages

    Gun control has been a controversial issue for many years. A vast majority of citizens believe that if gun control is strictly enforced it would quickly reduce the threat of crime. Many innocent people feel they have the right to bear arms for protection, or even just the pleasure of hunting. Americans have a constitutional right to own hand guns and stricter laws and licensing will not affectively save lives.

    Read More

More about Gun Debate to Bear Arms

Open Document