Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
why is social media good for communication
how social media is good for communication
why social media is good for communication
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: why is social media good for communication
People present different opinions towards creative forms of language use during web-based interactions and non-verbal communication. The use of grammatically incorrect language during interactions on the web is common among vast age groups, although prominent amidst young people. So, therefore arises the debate of whether ‘text talk’ degrades literacy skills or gives an opportunity to express thought in a creative manner.
The use of various techniques such as phonetic spelling, elision and ellipsis originated when mobile phone text services were first devised and money needed to be paid for each letter used in one text. This forced a vast obligation to scrutinize every single letter typed, and opened the opportunity to creativity narrow down language with it still being able to be decipherable to the recipient it is being sent to. As these techniques because embraced for the sender and receiver, they became common practice. Although, times have changed and the standard charge now is a lot more flexible, these language techniques are still ever popular and vastly used.
Facebook Chat is a direct messaging system, which allows various people to interact with each other in a non-verbal form. This is because there is an opening to see when ‘friends’ are online at that present time and is effective in instilling a turn taking conversation between people. The popularity of Facebook is mainly due to its opportunity to simulate regular conversations as it encourages extended conversations amongst ‘friends’ on Facebook. Allowing creative forms and preferences, which would otherwise be looked down upon during literacy texts, to thrive. As people are ‘friends’ it gives them the means to feel hypothetically connects on a personal level, desp...
... middle of paper ...
...text or relevancy of a Facebook chat.
There are a mix of public attitudes towards Ellison ‘lol’ and lack of correct grammar. This is a result of Ellison and incorrect grammar beginning on verbally spoken language amongst many people from social networking sites, such as Facebook. People can be inspired by the various creativity seen on Facebook and crave to hone their own creative preferences into everyday life.
Facebook Wall differs from Facebook Chat. In such that, Facebook Wall is a lot less private form of communication where holding the floor is more important than a turn taking system used in Facebook Chat. Brevity can be expressed on a Facebook Wall, ‘Ugh. Do. Not. Feel. Well. *dies*.’ This is creative in showing out the great pain the individual may be going through, through use of one word per sentence placing emphasis on the pain of that current moment.
As technology progress, humans evolve to the advanced technology and enhance our lives via technology. We connect to our families, friends and others through social media such as Facebook. Social media takes up a huge part in our lives. Social media infest us with information that are relevant and irrelevant to us. Marry Marrow wrote, “It was Facebook that changed the face of e-communication; in fact, it was the first electronic social media” (para 1). She assumes that Facebook is playing a huge role in electronic communication. In the journalist Maria Konnikova, “How Facebook makes us unhappy?”, Konnikova divulges many aspects of people on social media through researching and experience, and finds how social makes us unhappy. I agree with Konnikova findings after reading her article. In addition, she concludes that if you are engaged, active, and creative you will not sorrowful on Social media, however if you are passively browsing and defuse to engage, you
Known for his proactive essays, William Deresiewicz who was once an English professor at Yale bluntly explains to us his view on the “friendships” of Facebook. Deresiewicz ask how you can have so many friends and yet none at all. He considers friends on social media a simulacra. Comparing them to just any old collection of cards. “Posting information is like pornography, a slick, impersonal exhibition.” (Deresiewicz, 16) Social media, in this case Facebook, is just a generalization (not a personal) way of keeping in touch.
...of vulgarity, due to it being seen as “an easy way to set oneself apart,” and as individuals strain to be more notable then the other profiles, a discord can form between the users normal ethics/beliefs and those portrayed online.
Through the decades, languages have been altered, becoming more understandable to new generations. But this new written language that has arisen, is only comprehensible to those who “have a good understanding of syntax and grammar already” (Spires, 124). As explained by Dallas Spires, text messaging “uses different grammatical standards and many abbreviations…spelling is ignored…and verbs are not conjugated” (124). This form of media is used within an exclusive audience-mostly teens and young adults to communicate their thoughts and ideas with ease. Many people fear that this new form of written English replaces current modern English. If the mistreat of written English continues, a new form of incoherent and unconstrained language will be created for upcoming generations. The new media is making society commit these grammatical errors in the English language to simplify ideas. Using improper grammar through new media is becoming a crummy habit that will pass on from generation to generation if is not regulated or put to an
The high development of languages around the world is arguably humanity’s most remarkable feat. Without it, we would be not much better off than monkeys or gorillas. Whether seeking to persuade, to inform, to express emotions, to question, to transmit ideas, or even to deliver masterpieces in verse or prosaic, people use language in order to communicate effectively in ways that are simply too arduous to quantify. Language, furthermore, is also not limited to just writing or word of mouth, for it also is used in other fashions, such as codes. Smoke signals, body language, computer programs, as well as Morse and flag are just some examples. Since a person’s language, is essentially inherited, based on their birthplace, due to society’s standards, it is, at times, taken for
...emic world you’re going to take with you in the real world and if learning these bad/ uneducated habits is what you learn in school then that translates into your work/personal life. Slowly but surely, you’ll end up wishing you had never ever used improper English in school. As John Humphrys stresses, “Now I find myself slipping into sloppy habits, abandoning capitol letters and using row of dots” (Humphrys, 75). What Humphrys is trying to get across is texting in these short abbreviated words it made him slip into the bad habit of not caring about the simplest of things in a sentence such as capital letters or even completed it since the row of dots is equivalent to that.
“The Facebook Sonnet” by Sherman Alexie brings up ideas and controversy over social media because it decreases face-to-face communication. Though Facebook allows people to contact old and new friends, it renders away from the traditional social interaction. Online, people are easily connected by one simple click. From liking one’s status to posting multiple pictures, Facebook demands so much attention that it’s easy for users to get attach. They get caught up in all the online aspect of their lives that they fail to appreciate real life relationships and experiences. Within Alexie’s diction and tone, “The Facebook Sonnet” belittles the social media website by showing how society are either focused on their image or stuck in the past to even live in the present.
Language has been said to effect culture and a person’s way of thinking; in addition to culture effecting language. Throughout the last 100 years there have been apparent and subtle changes in the English language. The changes an English speaking person may see throughout their life time are different catchphrases, the way language is written, the type of formality used, and how deeply English is affected by cultures; as well as how it effects other cultures around the world.
There is no denying that social networking is an integral part of modern society. We spend all day updating our statuses about the latest episode of True Blood, or liking our friends’ photographs from their recent trips abroad. Our language has evolved to include words like “vlogging” and “tweeting” (which mean video blogging and posting to Twitter, respectively). Our “feeds” are linked to our cell phones, so they become available at the touch of a button. Social networking websites such as Facebook enable the world to constantly be connected; making the old ideas of groups (book clubs and tea parties, anyone?) seem vintage and obsolete.
We often hear news stories report on the possible negative effects texting has on students’ formal writing. These stories usually flash a picture of some student’s formal essay or class assignment containing a text-speak abbreviation in place of a formal word. For example, “u” in place of “you”. Stories like this cause educators and parents to worry that the use of texting is impairing students’ ability to write in a formal setting and is thus becoming detrimental to literacy altogether. However, do these news stories actually hold any merit or are they simply media hype? How often does textspeak actually appear in students’ writing? According to literary scholar David Crystal, “all the evidence suggests that belief in an impending linguistic disaster is a conseq...
John Humphrys say that he finds himself slipping into sloppy habits. He has been accidentally abandoning cappital leters and using rows and rows of dots. He writes “ I am cross…Lynne Truss”. Lynne Truss is an English writer who wrote Eats, Shoots & Leaves: The Zero Tolerance Approach to Puncuation. The book discusses the importance of punctuation and why it needs to be used properly. Thus his reasoning for calling her the “guardian of our language.” He himself doesn’t enjoy falling into those sloppy habits that is written in Truss’s book.. John Humphrys also believes that the English language is disappearing to the use of textese. Our literacy decreases as our use of textese increases. This leads to our incompetence. On the other hand David Crystal has his own idea on this topic. “Children could not… of your textese” David Crystals is simply saying before you can use the textese you need basic understanding of the English language. Children understanding how to properly text is due to the fact that they understand the English language which is actually competence. He also states “the children who were better… higher their test scores”. This is a pro-text statement. Texting actually increases literacy in this statement rather than decreasing like John Humphrys stated in article. He also states “The language as a whole… in evolution”. Texting will not lead us to decline but it leads to progress. Our language shall increase and
With the invention of the internet in the late 1960’s and the digital computer in the 1970’s, the digital age officially began, causing a ripple effect in the English language that few could have predicted. The digital age has since produced improved technology, faster communication between people, and slang and short hand that is shared more easily between the people of the world. Along with the digital age came a change in the way people perceived writing, their attention span, and the forums they used to share their thoughts. With these two inventions people were forced to add more value to their words in order to conform to forums and the audiences they were trying to reach. This time and the new concepts of the English language that it has brought with it has caused people to really think
Social networking, such as Facebook and Twitter, is a great tool for people to communicate, but it also leads to less face-to-face communication. Face-to-face discussions are the foundation of human communication that allows us to build trust and clearly
The problem in todays society with language, is that language is changing rapidly due to the use of technology, and affecting individuals. When we are on our phones or computers, we use a form of language called “internet slang”. Internet slang words are abbreviated words such as “TTYL, BRB, LOL, GTG, etc… We are using this form of shorthand language to convey a message quicker, and people also do not want to take the time to write out the whole message. Some social media website, blogs, and phone texts, allow us only to use a certain amount of characters, so people tend to abbreviated or shorter
which people communicate. How people form and maintain relationships are evolving in light of Internet-based technologies, most recently with the rise of social networking websites. Furthermore, these sites alter previously held beliefs related to identity formation and maintenance, as users may choose to share as much or as little personal information – whether true or fabricated – as they like with other users. These changes impact relationships in the offline world both positively and negatively. Although today people carry out their day-to-day relationships online, social media have weakened the meaning of friendship and emotional connections. In discussion of whether or not social media affects relationships positively or negatively, a differing viewpoint has been offered by William Deresiewicz in his essay “Faux Friendship” and Clive Thompson in his essay “I’m so digitally close to you”. On one hand Deresiewicz ridicules the use of online social networking in today’s society. On the other hand, Thompson contends and talks about how Facebook has positively changed the world.