Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
gospel of john ananlysis
teachings on gospel of john
teachings of the gospel of john
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: gospel of john ananlysis
Gospel of John This essay will show contrasts in views on the Gospel of John regarding authorship,dates, and the relationship between John's Gospel and the Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke. Some comparison of thought, concerning composition and life setting, will also be presented. The majority of the information that we have today, describing the earthly ministry of Jesus Christ, is contained in the four Gospels. The Gospels of Mathew, Mark and Luke, are called the Synoptic Gospels. The Gospel of John differs in many key areas to the Synoptics,and I will address some differing lines of thought. The two primary texts I will be using for comparison will be taken from; 1. " An introduction to the New Testament" pages 362379 titled "The Gospel according to John" by Raymond .E. Brown. 2. "John, Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament" pages 118 titled "Introduction to the Gospel of John" by Andreas. J. Kostenberger. Authorship. Raymond E.Brown contends that John may not have been responsible for all, or parts of the Gospel of John that are available to us today. He begins by stating that in the last two centuries the "majority of scholars shifted towards the position that John was not authored by an eyewitness" He also wrote "Accordingly the present Gospel is thought to involve the work of two hands, an evangelist who composed the body of the Gospel,and a redactor who later made additions." Brown goes on to make a number of statements, some his own thoughts, and some quoting other scholars, which give more indications of his own personal opinion and approach to the matter of authorship. For example, "...a typ... ... middle of paper ... ...ld not be exaggerated." Conclusion: I find it difficult to decide in some of these matters which way I "lean" as the matters concerned are complex and often clouded by the mists of nearly two millenia. I take some comfort in Kostenbergers attitude " .......without undue dogmatism on all sides." Also with Brown I am inclined to agree, in the absence of irrefutable proof, that it is wise to take a median position. Bibliography: Brown, R.E. Introduction to the New Testament (Doubleday.N.Y. 1996) Hill, J.R. Bible Study Commentary, John. (Ark Publishing,London 1981) Kostenberger, A. J. John, Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament. (Baker Bookhouse Co.2004) Knoch, A.E. Concordant Commentary on the New Testament. (Concordant publishing Concern.1968) Tasker, R.V.G. The Gospel according to St. John.(Tyndale Press. 1966)
its contents about its author.” This definitely contradicts the original idea of the gospel that Mark is the author, but
The Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John are the origin of nearly everything the Christian Church teaches about Jesus. The Gospels, in turn, serve as the scale or test of truth and authenticity of everything the church teaches about Jesus. It is said that the Gospels are the link between Jesus of Nazareth and the people of every age throughout history who have claimed to be his followers. Although the Gospels teach us about Jesus’ life they may not provide concrete evidence that what they speak of is true there are several other sources.
From bible scholars to the common people, everyone will profit from reading Can We Trust the Gospels?, by Mark D. Roberts. Throughout his assessments and while defeating critics, he explicates why people can undeniably trust the Gospels. He sustains evidence that it is realistic to trust the Gospels are historically true. “The evidence, when taken as a whole, strongly supports the view that the biblical Gospels paint a reliable picture of Jesus” (pg. 195). As a result of reading this book, one will gain a profound assurance of the reliability of the
English, E. Schuylyer. Studies in the Gospel According to Matthew. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1938.
"The Gospel According to John." usccb.org. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, 1 Jan. 2014. Web. 16 Apr. 2014. .
The New Testament is a collection of different spiritual literary works, which includes the Gospels, a history of early church, the epistles of Paul, other epistles and apocalypse. Without deeply thinking or researching of the chronological order of the Gospels, a reader should not have problem to observe that the Gospels begin with the Gospel of Matthew, and to notice that there are many common areas, including content and literary characteristics, among the first three Gospels, the Gospel of Matthew, Mark, and Luke.
John as we know today was one of the twelve apostles of Jesus. He was also the brother of James, who was also an apostle. John was the son of Zeebee and of Salome. His father was a fisherman while living in Bethsaida in Galilee on the border of the lake Gennesareth. John's mother was one of many women who gave to the maintenance of Jesus Christ. John's parents were very good people, they loved God and his son. It is said that john and his brother James were fishing when Jesus came and chose them. They were soon known as the fishers of men. The John of whom I am talking about is John the Evangelist.
form of the truth, it is only the Gospel of John that provides a detailed guide
The study of the Gospel of John can be viewed as distinct and separate from the study of any of the previous three synoptic gospels. The Fourth Gospel contains language and conceptions so distinct from the synoptics that scholars are often faced with the question of its historical origins. Originally, scholars believed the main source for the Gospel of John to be Jewish wisdom literature, Philo, the Hermetic books and the Mandaean writings, leading to the idea that John was the most Greek of the Gospels. However, with the discovery of the scrolls, scholars were now faced with source materials, remarkably similar to the concepts and language found in John, illuminating the literature as not only Jewish but Palestinian in origin. The discovery of the manuscripts opened up an entirely new interpretation of the gospel of John and a progressive understanding of its proper place within biblical scripture.
sections. The grand effect of the Fourth Gospel is due to its parts melting into one
Mark’s gospel and John’s gospel contain many differences from the beginning, but both end with Jesus’ crucifixion and resurrection. The gospels of John and Mark represent Jesus as two different people. The disparity is that Mark represents Jesus as a servant while John portrays Jesus as a divine being. However, one must realize the two texts are meant to read by different audiences during different time periods. Each description presents a particular aspect of the life of Historical Jesus.
John was one of the first twelve disciples of Jesus and therefore an eye-witness (John 19:35); John brings out the spiritual significance as well as recording the practical aspects of Jesus' works and words. John lived to be older than any of the other writers. It is therefore likely that he was familiar with their accounts and wanted to supplement theirs with additional teaching and miracles by Jesus which had a bearing on the situation towards the end of the first century AD.
The movie The Gospel of John (Seville, 2005) is a visual representation of the accounts of Jesus Christ life on earth. The big picture is that of God’s plan for a personal relationship with us. When God created humans, he put them into relationships, first with him and then with each other. The strength of the movie is how Jesus core values of truth, love and compassion are portrayed through his relationship with his disciples. Jesus fostered the relationships with his disciples, showing love through his teachings and interactions with societal outcast. He displayed his value system through the use of parables and commandments, and performing miracles.
The Gospel According to St. John was written during the first century AD in Asian Minor. The author of the book cannot be definitively proven according to the Zinderfan Pictorial Bible Dictionary but there is strong evidence that the author was John the apostle. The author had an intimate knowledge of Jewish traditions and the geography of Palestine. The gospel goes into many explanations of these things because its intended audience was gentiles. It is unlikely a gentile would have had the knowledge to give the background information that the author presents. The writer of the gospel identifies himself as the "disciple who Jesus loved." In the gospel most of the disciples were mentioned by name and so can be eliminated as the author of the gospel. Those not mentioned included Mathew, James the less, Simon the Zealot, James, and John.
O’Day, Gail R. (1995). “The Gospel of John.” 491-865. In The New Interpreter’s Bible: A Commentary in Twelve Volumes. Vol. 9. Nashville: Abingdon Press.