Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Elements of the Affordable Care Act
Affordable health care for america act
Affordable health care for america act
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Elements of the Affordable Care Act
In March of 2010, amid national controversy, Congress passed and President Obama signed into law the Affordable Health Care Act. According to a U.S. Department of Health and Human Services pamphlet, the law is supposed to cut health care costs (“Understanding the Affordable Care Act: About the Law”). But where does it specifically say that it will, and more importantly, how? Looking through the Compilation of Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act, published by the Office of Legal Counsel for the U.S. House of Representatives during the debate of the bill, I found nothing in it that would reduce the costs a person would pay for a doctor's visit or a prescription from the pharmacy. But there is plenty of information on how the law will require all citizens to give more money to insurance companies. An article by Jill Bernstein et al, in a Mathmatica Policy Research brief titled, “How Does Insurance Coverage Improve Health Outcomes?”, attempts to support the new law and persuade its readers why everyone should have health care insurance and the benefits of doing so. But my question is still the same. Why? Why can't we make laws that actually make it affordable for an individual pay out of their own pocket, directly to a doctor or pharmacy? The only conclusion I can come to is greed. With this paper I want to show how the Affordable Health Care Act does little to actually provide consumers with quality health care at an affordable price. How it actually increases the costs of health care is because of the greed of the health care, pharmaceutical, and health insurance industries. That the costs of health services will continue to rise without direct regulation of the health care industry. According to Berns... ... middle of paper ... ... Annuls of Internal Medicine. 154.3 (2011): 174-180. Print. Perkes, Courtney. "Some consumers with health coverage skip it for cheaper prices, convenience.." Orange County Register 18 Jul 2007, Print Rath, Kim. "Health Care Reform's 15 Big Changes: Despite uncertainty about the effects of the U.S. health care overhaul. major changes loom.." Collector. 76.1 (2011): 22-24. Print. United States. Understanding the Affordable Care Act: About the Law. District of Columbia: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2010. Print. U.S. House of Representatives. Compilation of Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act. District of Columbia: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2010. Print. Teixiera-Lamos, Edite. "Regular Physical Exercise Training Assists in Preventing Type 2 Diabetes Development." Cardiovascular Diabetology. 10.12 (2011): 1-15. Print.
of the essay used a metaphor of the rich people of the earth in a lifeboat and the poor people in the sea drowning. The rich people could only allow a few people in and if they let, too many people in they will sink the boat and all die. The best thing for the rich people to do is not to let anyone in so they will have adequate supplies and space for them to survive. Later in the essay, Hardin writes about the differences in the population growth between rich and poor nations. Poor nations multiply
"There should be no rich religious people as long as there is poverty." I will examine eight points of view and explain them in and what could to those opinions then, based on those, come to my own conclusions. 'Religious People Could Do More' Religious people in that 10% are prone to having spare money, yet not much is done. If they were to donate enough money poverty could be brought to an end in a variety of places. This would mean a lot of money being donated, but if you have the
the rich? Andrew Carnegie was an American industrialist, philanthropist, and business magnate who is best known for his innovative role in the steel industry during the late 19th century. Later in his life he was known for his philanthropy and philosophy about the moral obligation for the rich to use their wealth to benefit society. In his essay The Gospel Of Wealth, Carnegie speaks about the distribution of surplus wealth from the rich to society. Carnegie argued that it was not about giving things
Becoming rich is a highly desirable goal in most people’s lives; it includes owning various valuable possessions and wealth. A contrasting rich is poverty, which there are two types of; relative and absolute poverty. Relative poverty is when you can only afford the minimum levels of the necessities to life, such as food, clothing, shelter, money, medication etc...) Absolute poverty consists of barely having the sufficient amount of basic needs to survive; therefore people who are in absolute poverty
of money that Carnegie has donated to various places which in total he has donated well over $271m but aside from that his corporation is giving out about $100m a year, most of it to education (Doc C)
The book “ Wars and Watermelons” that was published in 2011 shows how families struggled to make sure that there loved one aren’t drafted into the army. Both Rich Wallace and Carl Sandburg serious poem and book “ War and Watermelons” and “ A Father to His Son” both illustrates the importance of spending time with your family and the ones you love. Spend time with your family and the ones you love. The way they show the theme is different, but they both do have the same theme. Spend time with the
Why Poor People Are More Generous Than The Rich An anonymous article published by the online newspaper, The Economist, explains the revolutionary experiments conducted by Paul Piff and makes the unconventional statement that it is the poor, not the rich, who are inclined to charity. The thought of poor people being more generous than the rich is something that wouldn’t make sense to most. Some may ask themselves, “Why would someone who has “less,” give more?” But this question is one that I have
The Giving Pledge “The Giving Pledge” is a campaign launched by Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates and billionaire investor Warren Buffett, to get the wealthiest people in the world to give most of their wealth to philanthropic causes. Bill Gates and his wife Melinda Gates, as well as Warren Buffett is standing in the lead of the campaign. They are asking hundreds of rich Americans to pledge at least 50% of their wealth to charity. One of the founders of the organization - Warren Buffett, made
Many people don’t want to believe that we are living in a social injustice environment in this country. They choose to ignore the fact that rich are getting richer while the poor are just getting poorer. The rich public schools are giving their students the necessary opportunities to live a decent life while the poor students are left out and have to struggle for those opportunities. The social injustice is visible to every citizen in this country and it continuing to grown; however, there is a few
exaggerating the negative consequences of aiding the poor, as well as building them on false assumptions. Both Arthur and Hardin are promoting the self-interest without considering the rights of others, and without considering that giving for famine relief means giving life to many children. A Case against John Arthur In the article Famine Relief and the Ideal Moral Cod... ... middle of paper ... ... Friedman, U. (2011, July 19). What It took for the U.N to declare famine in Somalia
often shared with other people, giving us a greater sense of connection, and they form a bigger part of our sense of identity”. (Blackman). Having a good quality time is worth more than money, money can’t be compared to the time you had with your loved ones, going on trips, having dinner together, watching movies together. These are more important than just focusing on money and losing all the opportunity to spend time with your loved ones and this is something the rich people don’t know because
of sin is known as idolatry. The story above relates to the parable of “The Rich Man and Lazarus”. Jesus’ parable of “The Rich Man and Lazarus” teaches us the result of having too many riches, and the consequences for not helping others. First off, if you are not one of the thousands of people who have already read this parable, I will give you a brief synopsis. Let us start with the two main characters. There is a rich man (not named) and a poor man named Lazarus. Lazarus is on the ground with
concept of philanthropy. Andrew Carnegie’s The Gospel of Wealth takes the defensive position on his philosophy of philanthropy. In contrast, Paul Vallely delves into the negative side of philanthropy in his article How Philanthropy Benefits the Super-rich. Another article that takes a closer look into the known and
family, because he believed it to be “misguided affection” This was selfish of him to give his own family enough money, the money that they deserve. In addition in the Cartoon Published in The Saturday Globe it shows that while Andrew Carnegie was giving money to other countries, his workers needed the money the most to be able to support their families. Some people may disagree and say that Andrew Carnegie was a hero, because he had integrity, and was financially successful. In the article Andrew
Wealth and Poverty in the World In the world today there is a lot of poverty. There is a great divide between the world’s rich and poor people. In the world today there are also rich people but the number of poor peoples out number them. There are many reasons as to why there is poverty in the world. Being a poor person can mean that you do not have enough food to eat for months, or even years and not just for a few hours or few days. Poverty can also mean not having enough money to be