Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Argumentative essay about free trade
Advantages of free trade in International Political Economy
Argumentative essay about free trade
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Argumentative essay about free trade
Introduction
Adam Smith, author of The Wealth of Nations, shows support for free trade and emphasises it as a trade policy which ought to be adopted. Krugman and Obstfeld back Smith's support by stating that the efficiency of trade is increased by free trade and accumulates the national income of countries. Free trade is a theory which suggests that each nation benefits in specialising in an economic activity from which it gains absolute advantage, enjoying absolute superiority over other nations in a specif economical activity (Peng). With free trade follows opportunity, replacing regulation and growth of economic activity. (Rugmann and Collinson).
Arguments for free trade
Trading Barriers
If nations adopted a free trading policy the total cost of tariffs, duty on imports, would be reduced; resulting in a cost efficient method of international trade. Alongside specialising in an economic activity within one nation, a reallocation of resources for more efficient nations allows trade to be fair and enhance the quality of resources.
The reduction of trade barriers enables the local prices of goods to reduce too, which will eventually lead to an enhancement in the economical welfare situation of nations by reducing the limitations of new entrants into the markets. The removal of barriers would mean a free and fair opportunity for all nations to gain impartial access into any market benefitting them with a fair chance in competition. Another beneficial outcome is that with new economic activities taking place in foreign subsidised countries will see an increase in employment for local potential workers, lower business costs and a circulation of the local finances enhancing the economy of the nation. However, a noteworth...
... middle of paper ...
...ction.aspx. Last accessed 6/1/2011>
Cullen,S. (2009). Feature: Protectionism in the EU? . Available: http://www.politics.co.uk/features/economy-and-finance/feature-protectionism-in-the-eu--$1273249.htm#. Last accessed 6/1/2011.
The Literacy Encyclopedia. (2005). Corn Law. Available: http://www.litencyc.com/php/stopics.php?rec=true&UID=%20225. Last accessed 6/1/2011
Jones. G, Helm. T and Wilson. G. (2007). British workers for British jobs says Brown. Available: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1553710/British-workers-for-British-jobs-says-Brown.html. Last accessed 6/1/2011.
The IMF. (2010). Factsheet: IMF at a Glance. Available: http://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/facts/glance.htm. Last accessed 6/1/2011
References: Journal Articles
• Lieberman, Marvin B., and David, B Montgomery. "First - mover advantages." Strategic Management Journal 9 (1998) : 41-58
As you can see, labor and trade are the key importance to modern wealth. Production and trade are not just needed but are essential for a country to survive. Smith makes it ideal for countries to interact and trade. Trade means you get more directs workers into jobs in which they have a comparative advantage, which means more
The United States free trade agenda includes policies that seek to eliminate all restrictions and quotas on trade. The advantages of free trade can be seen through domestic markets and the growth of the world economy. T...
In 1776, even as Adam Smith was championing the ideals of a free market economy, he recognized that the interests of national security far outweighed the principles of free trade. More then two centuries later, that sentiment proves to still be accurate and in use. Since the early 1900s, the United States has used this precept to defend its position on trade barriers to hostile nations, and through the majority of the century, that predominantly referred to the Soviet Union and its allies.
Few governments will argue that the exchange of goods and services across international borders is a bad thing. However, the degree to which an international trading system is open may come into contest with a state’s ability to protect its interests. Free trade is often portrayed in a good light, with focus placed on the material benefits. Theoretically, free trade enables a distribution of resources across state lines. A country’s workforce may become more productive as it specializes in products that it has a comparative advantage. Free trade minimizes the chance that a market will have a surplus of one product and not enough of another. Arguably, comparative specialization leads to efficiency and growth.
Smith’s text in his book seems to be characterized by fact-heavy tangents, tables and supplementary material that combine hard research with generalities, showing his commitment to give proof for what seem like never-ending observations about the natural way of economics. Smith’s Wealth of Nations Books I and II focus on the idea of the development of division of labor, and describe how each division adds to the fortune of a given society by creating large surpluses, which can be traded or exchanged amongst the members of Labor. The division of labor also fuels technological innovation, by giving a lot of focus to specific tasks, and allowing workers to brainstorm ways to make these tasks quicker or more efficient, increasing maximum output. This, again, adds to efficiency and increases surpluses so that the surplus items may be traded or re-invested somewhere else. Near the end of the case, technologies are likely to improve, foreshadowing them to become even greater efficient.
While free trade has certainly changed with advances in technology and the ability to create external economies, the concept seems to be the most benign way for countries to trade with one another. Factoring in that imperfect competition and increasing returns challenge the concept of comparative advantage in modern international trade markets, the resulting introduction of government policies to regulate trade seems to result in increased tensions between countries as individual nations seek to gain advantages at the cost of others. While classical trade optimism may be somewhat naïve, the alternatives are risky and potentially harmful.
...would also trigger an unintentional effect that would eventually benefited the society as a whole by maximizing the total profit if individuals all follow their self-interest to behave. Newbert explained “For, only capitalism allows individuals to automously choose their own course of action, provided that in so doing, they do not violate the rights of others by forcing them to buy or sell a given product or service” (Newbert 2003, 253). From here, we can realize Smith’s insight towards the early form of capitalism. Finally, Smith’s suggested that free trade is the only way that helps a nation to sustain stable economic growth. He thinks that mercantilism is a barrier of the growth of a nation. He claimed that a nation will be able to maximize the wealth only if they use their competitive advantage on production and trade the surplus under the free trade economy.
This sort of arrangement not only eliminates hurdles to trade but promote foreign investment as well, not giving room to economies for making use of import tariffs to safeguard their rising industries or their farmers from abundances of inexpensive imports. This trade agreement also contains extra guidelines on investment that poses a possible threat to poor publics' access to public services.
All nations can get the benefits of free trade by being specialized in producing goods they have a comparative advantage and then trade them with goods produced by other nations in the world. This is evidenced by comparative advantage theory. Trade depends on many factors, country's history, institution, size and. geographical position and many more. Also, the countries put trade barriers for the exchange of their goods and services with other nations in order to protect their own company from foreign competition, or to protect consumers from undesirable products, or sometimes it may be inadvertent.
Free trade is a form of economic policy which allows countries to import and export goods among each other with no government interference. In recent years there has been a general consensus in economist’s stance on free trade. They view free trade as an asset. Free trade allows for an abundance of goods with increased varieties and increased availability. The products become cheaper for consumers and no one company monopolizes an industry. The system of free trade has been highly controversial. While free trade benefits consumers it has the potential to hurt manufacturers and businesses thus creating a debate between supporters of free trade and those with antagonistic positions.
In order for international trade to work well, governments must allow the world market to determine how goods are sold, manufactured and traded for all to economically prosper. While all nations may have the capability to produce any goods or services needed by their population, it is not possible for all nations to have a comparative advantage for producing a good due to natural resources of the country or other available resources needed to produce a good or service. The example of trading among states comprising the United States is an example of how free trade works best without the interve...
We begin our study of free trade by understanding the four principles of individual decision making.... ... middle of paper ... ... Edge, Ken, “Free trade and Protection: advantages and disadvantages of free trade” NSW HSC online http://www.hsc.csu.edu.au/economics/global_economy/tut7/Tutorial7.html#more Accessed November 29, 2011. Net Aparijita, Sinha, “What are the disadvantages of free trade?
Firstly, what should be noted here is that international trade has been providing different benefits for firms as they may expand in different new markets and raise productivity by adopting different approaches. Given that nowadays marketplace is more dynamic and characterized by an interdependent economy, the volume of international trade has grown substantially in recent years, reducing the barriers to international trade. However, after experiencing the economic crisis that took its toll in 2008 many countries adopted a different approach in terms of trade barriers by introducing higher tariffs in order to protect domestic firms from foreign competition (Hill). Secondly, in order to better understand the implications of the political arguments for trade it is essential to highlight the main instruments of trade policy (See appendix 1).
In the old views of economics, people were not interested in trading because they thought that through exchange they wouldn’t gain anything more valuable in return. Countries would then control this trading through taxes and protection. Smith then, showed why this method was irrational. “He argued that in a free exchange, both sides became better off” (Deeson). Free trade meant that both parties would benefit and thus, increase economic expansion in both ways. Through his morals and values he stated “A nation’s wealth is not the quantity of gold and silver in its vaults, but the total of its production and commerce” (Deeson). Through production, capitalism, and labor the industrial revolution shifted...
Free trade is a policy that relies on the concept of comparative advantage that when comparing two countries one of those countries will have the capability to make a product that is better than the other country. So it is best if each country focuses its efforts and resources into one product to increase the economic activity for both countries. The determination of who produces a product better is based on the open market without intervention from a government who may try to control a trade by imposing government protective measures such as tariffs. The World Trade Organization has been tasked with monitoring free trade, but it has been noted that their policing has not been effective to stop such interventions. Free trade not only relies on a laissez-faire approach but also on assumptions of conditions. The assumptions used by many for economic theories are not always accurate but rather the justification for using the assumptions is so that economic theories can be applied for the greater good of an economy.