In the modern world of contemporary economics trade liberilisation and globalization are constantly debated topics. One side of the arguing that free trade and globalization will lead ultimately lead to developing countries being alleviated of poverty and developed nation’s GDP will reflect an increase that would otherwise be unattainable. The other side of the argument however claims that there is already contrary evidence that the introduction of free trade unfairly favors developed nations and that it cripples infant industries. Below will be elaborated on globalisation and trade liberilisation, also relations to international trade theories from David Ricardo, David Ricardo and the Heckscher-Ohlin theorem.
Globalisation is a worldwide movement towards economic, trade, financial and communications integration (“Business Dictionary,” 2013). This would allow firms to operate on a multinational level, previously being restricted to local communities as their target market. Taking advantage of different factors of production abundances in multiple countries. An important aspect to globilisation is trade liberilisation, which is the removal or reduction of trade barriers on the free exchange of goods between nations (“Investopedia,” n.d). These barriers can include tariffs and quotas as well as non tariff obstacles such as licensing rules (“Investopedia,” n.d). Removing such barriers allows international trade occur easier and countries are able to put to practice the comparative advantage aspect in relation to other economies.
In Adam Smiths paper “The Wealth Of Nations” paper by Adam Smiths projects the view on international trade as not a zero sum equation resulting in being beneficial to all parties involved eventually. By e...
... middle of paper ...
...country.
One of the main arguments against globalization is that large corporations take advantage of poorer nations. Opponents argue that corporations take advantage of the labor force by giving them unfair working conditions as well as having a disregard for the environment (“Economist” 2001). While this may have been the case in the past most multinational corporations are working to clean up their practices in developing countries.
Regardless of the way that the standard of living is measured, there is clear evidence that economies that adopt free trade policies outperform their counterparts that maintain protective trade barriers. This economic performance has lead to clear increases in the standard of living in these countries, providing clear examples that free trade can be used to help underdeveloped economies catch up to more developed nations.
In the Humanistic Tradition the author, Gloria Fiero introduces Adam smith as a Scottish moral philosopher, pioneer of political economy, and a key figure in the Scottish Enlightenment. Smith also known as the Father of Political economy, is best known for one of his two classic works An Inquiry into the nature and causes of the Wealth of Nations. Fiero looks at Smith’s work because the division of labor is important. One thing Smith thinks is even more important for creating a wealthy nation, is to interact and have open trade with different countries. Fiero states,“It is necessary, though very slow and gradual, consequence of a certain propensity in human nature which has in view no such extensive utility; the propensity to truck, barter,
Adam Smith often called the “founder of modern economics,” utilizes his observational assumptions to construct his own rationale for society, economics, and human nature. His observations are based on sentiments regarding issues that are far ranging. Within the Wealth of Nations Smith makes claims regarding human nature, such as “self-love” is inherent, the faculties of reason and speech, and the nature of humans to “truck and barter.” Smith examines the notion of a free market economy that is based upon reason rather than belief. This poignant observation on human nature has its bias and facts, with regards to Smith’s examination of society.
...ystem primarily responsible for promoting global competition. Free trade also promotes shifts in production so as to fit the “comparative advantage” model. Though free trade is widely practiced concerns with how to regulate free trade, something supposedly unregulated, countries have to subject themselves to the controversial institutions of the IMF and WTO. Fair trade policies while potentially creating smaller markets support workers’ rights in both the U.S. and developing nations. Though the pros and cons of globalization continue to be debated the United States can no longer escape its role in the global economy nor can it impose policies that are detrimental to the United States founding ideals. However policies that play towards the advantages of both free and fair trade could stimulate a healthy domestic economy that is also competitive in the global market.
Naomi Klein’s No Logo states that corporations have been championing globalization using the reasons that globalization allows U.S. consumers to benefit from cheaper products produced abroad, while developing nations benefit from the economic growth stimulated by foreign investments. The generally accepted belief is that governmental policies should be established in favor of the corporations to facilitate the trickling down of corporate profits to the end consumers and workers abroad. Klein, however, contends that globalization rarely benefit the workers in the developing countries.
Few governments will argue that the exchange of goods and services across international borders is a bad thing. However, the degree to which an international trading system is open may come into contest with a state’s ability to protect its interests. Free trade is often portrayed in a good light, with focus placed on the material benefits. Theoretically, free trade enables a distribution of resources across state lines. A country’s workforce may become more productive as it specializes in products that it has a comparative advantage. Free trade minimizes the chance that a market will have a surplus of one product and not enough of another. Arguably, comparative specialization leads to efficiency and growth.
Smith’s text in his book seems to be characterized by fact-heavy tangents, tables and supplementary material that combine hard research with generalities, showing his commitment to give proof for what seem like never-ending observations about the natural way of economics. Smith’s Wealth of Nations Books I and II focus on the idea of the development of division of labor, and describe how each division adds to the fortune of a given society by creating large surpluses, which can be traded or exchanged amongst the members of Labor. The division of labor also fuels technological innovation, by giving a lot of focus to specific tasks, and allowing workers to brainstorm ways to make these tasks quicker or more efficient, increasing maximum output. This, again, adds to efficiency and increases surpluses so that the surplus items may be traded or re-invested somewhere else. Near the end of the case, technologies are likely to improve, foreshadowing them to become even greater efficient.
Nowadays, Globalization is a main trend for the world economic. The world’s economy has become fully integrated. There are no barriers and borders to trade around the world.
Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations argues for a system of political economy that separates economy – the creation and distribution of wealth – from governmental interference. In Smith’s view, the economy of a nation grows as a direct consequence of private business ventures in the interest of each individual owner. Regulation by the government hurts the economy, and the progress of society is derived from the flow of the market. Things should be left in their natural states, thus maintaining a “natural order” of society. The basis of Smith’s thesis is that this natural order is driven by Man’s self-interest.
The foundation of every economy lies in the creation of goods and services. In Wealth of Nations, Smith encourages that nations maximize the number of these essential products in order to achieve greater wealth . The specific types of goods and services would be dependent on the personal interests and desires of consumers. In other words, the relationship between supply and demand dictates what types of commodities will be available.
...would also trigger an unintentional effect that would eventually benefited the society as a whole by maximizing the total profit if individuals all follow their self-interest to behave. Newbert explained “For, only capitalism allows individuals to automously choose their own course of action, provided that in so doing, they do not violate the rights of others by forcing them to buy or sell a given product or service” (Newbert 2003, 253). From here, we can realize Smith’s insight towards the early form of capitalism. Finally, Smith’s suggested that free trade is the only way that helps a nation to sustain stable economic growth. He thinks that mercantilism is a barrier of the growth of a nation. He claimed that a nation will be able to maximize the wealth only if they use their competitive advantage on production and trade the surplus under the free trade economy.
The pivotal second chapter of Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations, "Of the Principle which gives occasion to the Division of Labour," opens with the oft-cited claim that the foundation of modern political economy is the human "propensity to truck, barter, and exchange one thing for another."1 This formulation plays both an analytical and normative role. It offers an anthropological microfoundation for Smith's understanding of how modern commercial societies function as social organizations, which, in turn, provide a venue for the expression and operation of these human proclivities. Together with the equally famous concept of the invisible hand, this sentence defines the central axis of a new science of political economy designed to come to terms with the emergence of a novel object of investigation: economic production and exchange as a distinct, separate, independent sphere of human action. Moreover, it is this domain, the source of wealth, which had become the main organizational principle of modern societies, displacing the once-ascendant positions of theology, morality, and political philosophy.
The central thesis of The Wealth of Nations is that capital is best employed for the production and distribution of wealth under conditions of governmental noninterference, or laissez-faire, and free trade. In Smith’s view, the production and exchange of goods can be stimulated, and a consequent rise in the general standard of living attained, only through the efficient operations of private industrial and commercial entrepreneurs acting with a minimum of regulation and control by the governments. To explain this concept of government maintaining laissez-faire attitude toward the commercial endeavors, Smith proclaimed the principle of the “invisible hand”: Every individual in pursuing his or her own good is led, as if by an invisible hand, to achieve the best good for all. Therefore any interference with free competition by government is almost certain to be injurious.
First of all globalization has led to exploitation of labor. We can’t ignore the fact that ethical aspects of international business deserve special attention. Corruption and engaging in illegal practice to make greater profit is a source of continuing controversy. Sometimes companies go international and move their production to foreign countries so they could employ workers for long hours, at low wages and in poor working conditions (sweat shops). They are also using child labor, the employment of children to a full time work that can be otherwise done by adults all that so they could get out of their responsibility towards their workers by avoiding paying them national insurance …When these multinational firms go abroad they forget all about principles and about human beings and their rights, according to Kent, J., Kinetz, E. & Whehrfritz, G. (2008/March24). Newsweek. Bottom of the barrel. “The dark side of globalization: a vast work force trapped in conditions that verge on slavery”, David, P. Falling of The Edge, Travels through the Dark Heart of Globalization..Nov 2008. (p62) also agrees with them when he explained his concerns about Chinese and Indians t...
“The Wealth of Nations” is the starting point of the modern study of the political economy. Smith is currently the first to present a comprehensive and systematic theory of economics.
Globalization, love it or hate it, but you can’t escape it. Globalization may be regarded as beneficial from an economic and business point of view, but however cannot be perceived the ditto when examined from the social sciences and humanities side of it. Globalization can be argued as a tool for economic growth, advancement and prosperity through co-operation between the developed and developing countries. The pro-globalization critics argue that the benefits that globalization brings to developing nations surpasses or outcasts the negative impacts caused by globalization and may even go a step further to state that it is the only source of hope for developing nations to prosper and stand out. However, the real question to be asked is as to what extent are the positives argued upon without taking into account the negative aspects of globalization towards developing countries. Moreover, how many developing countries out of many are exactly benefiting or even prospering from globalization is another question to consider. Therefore, my paper will dispute that indeed growth and advancement provided by globalization to developing countries is beneficial in short-term, but in the long-run, it will only bring upon negative impacts and challenges due to the obstacles involved such as exploitation of labour and resources, higher increase in poverty, and effects of multi-national corporations on local businesses and the economy, and to an extent the effects on the developing country itself.