Frank O'Connor's Guests of the Nation

1437 Words3 Pages

In Frank O’Connor’s “Guests of the Nation,” the narrator, called Bonaparte by his fellow rebels, recounts his reluctant role in the execution of two English soldiers in retaliation for the slaughter of four Irish rebels. O'Connor develops this conflict between revolutionary attitudes in the strained relationship between the narrator and Jeremiah Donovan, the experienced rebel, who has the responsibility for fulfilling the Second Battalion’s order to shoot the prisoners. The young revolutionary Bonaparte discovers, in his imprudent acceptance of group values, evil within himself. Against his ideal of actions appropriate to him as an individual, Bonaparte and his fellow-revolutionary Noble, at the insistence of their superior officer who contends that their duty as soldiers demands the executions, participate in the murder of two English hostages who have lived among them as friends for many months. For both young men, their action is a profound betrayal of soul.
The narrative employs a first-person participant point of view to dramatize the irony. The protagonist, Bonaparte’s narration occurs far in the future, distanced by many years from the event he recounts; the vividness and immediacy of his story indicates the extent to which he has been marked forever by his early experience. The older Bonaparte presents himself as a young soldier comfortable with his prisoners, only gradually coming to perceive that these friends may have to be killed.
O’Connor begins the story in a misleading way. The opening paragraph establishes both that the men are becoming "chums" (the word becomes ironic as their friendship is torn apart) and that they spend a good deal of time playing cards, an activity that not only breaks down the military barr...

... middle of paper ...

...reviously held, alienated from his own people including from his sympathetic comrade Noble and the old woman in whose house they were staying; alienated from both earth and heaven, and “the birds and the bloody stars” (O’Connor 5). The cozy dusk that opens the narrative gives way to darkness. The pleasant community of banter and card playing is replaced by isolation. The young soldier, who felt like an adult at the beginning of the narrative, feels “very small and very lost and lonely like a child astray in the snow” at the end. (O’Connor 5). The last sentence, “And anything that ever happened to me after I never felt the same about again,” indicates the permanent break between the narrator’s morally comfortable youth and his present pain. He is left feeling isolated from the nation in whose cause he murdered both an enemy-friend and his own youthful patriotic self.

Open Document