The tragical history of Doctor Faustus

1577 Words4 Pages

The tragical history of Doctor Faustus, which followed in the wake of

Tamburlaine, is acclaimed by all as Marlowe's best play in which the

leaven of fertile poetry and fearless imagination works wonders.

Introduction:

The tragical history of 'Doctor Faustus', which followed in the wake

of 'Tamburlaine', is acclaimed by all as Marlowe's best play in which

the leaven of fertile poetry and fearless imagination works wonders.

The idea of a passionate struggle to reach beyond the grasp of

ordinary mortals as its theme Marlowe takes this old story of the

medieval magician who sells his soul to the Devil for twenty four

years of pleasure and the gift of all knowledge and gives it a

significance as in to that of such world old myths as Eve's eating the

apple and Prometheus' defiance of Gods. Hence, making the Faustus

legend a symbol of humanity's splendid struggle to reach the stars, as

well as a tragedy of infinite aspiration ending in agony and remorse.

Inspite of the critics and scholars being one in their opinion to

recognize Christopher Marlowe's 'Doctor Faustus' as one of the

masterpieces of British drama there cannot be any denying the fact

that the most glaring weakness of 'Doctor Faustus' lies in the lack of

a well knit or an organic plot.

Aristotle's definition of Tragedy:

According to Aristotle 'Tragedy' in the real sense is an imitation of

an action that is complete, and whole, and of a certain magnitude; The

beginning, called by modern critics the incentive moment, must start

the cause-and-effect chain but not be dependent on anything outside

the compass of the play meaning that its causes are downplayed but its

effects are stressed. The middle, or climax, must be caused by earlier

incid...

... middle of paper ...

...d are laid bare.

Conclusion:

Hence the fact remains that 'Doctor Faustus' is unquestionably a

masterpiece by Christopher Marlowe and one of the greatest and the

most powerful tragedy to be written before Shakespeare inspite of its

flaws and limitations. But at the same time it is also clear that

though the beginning of the play just like the end has been perfectly

executed but the middle portion is weak and does not serve its

purpose. As Levin puts it: "The structural weakness of the plot

however corresponds to the anti-climax of the parable; it lays bare

the gaps between the bright hopes of the initial scene and the abysmal

consequences of the last". Therefore, the statement that Doctor

Faustus has a beginning and an end but no middle can be accepted to

some extent as the middle portion though existing is not relevant to

the development of the play.

Open Document