Force, Right, and Freedom in Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s Philosophy

Force, Right, and Freedom in Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s Philosophy

Length: 986 words (2.8 double-spaced pages)

Rating: Excellent

Open Document

Essay Preview

More ↓
In the Social Contract Rousseau discusses the best way to run a state
and uses philosophical arguments to argue his case. He also uses the
ideas of force, right and freedom to support his argument. He feels
we require a civil state, as opposed to living in the state of nature,
as ‘it substitutes justice for instinct….and gives his actions a moral
quality’ and describes the civil state as having ‘transformed him from
a stupid, limited animal into an intelligent being and a man’ (Unit,
p109).

He believed that it is not right that you should obey someone just
because of force and that for the state to be run properly the power
it has must be legitimate. He say’s ‘authority is legitimate if the
person (or institution) possesses the right to command others’ (Unit,
p.97), in other words, authority cannot use naked force to command
obedience. He also believed that ‘to be legitimate, the authority the
state has over the people must come from the people themselves, and
not from a single person such as the king.’ (Unit, P.97)

In order to prove the point that might does not equal right, that is
that ‘because you can force me to obey you, is it right that I should
obey you?’ (Unit, p100), Rousseau uses the example of ‘The strongest
is never strong enough to be master all the time, unless he transforms
force into right and obedience into duty….Force is a physical power; I
fail to see what morality can result from its effects.’ (Unit, p100),
in other words, unless the authority is legitimate and the people feel
obliged to obey, rather

than forced to obey, when the authority is absent, the people ‘will
not necessarily obey’ (Unit, p100).

Rousseau defines the fundamental problem of the best way to run a
state as how the people can live in the state and still remain free,
and he goes on to suggest that the solution is to ‘find a form of
association’, i.

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Force, Right, and Freedom in Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s Philosophy." 123HelpMe.com. 06 Apr 2020
    <https://www.123helpme.com/view.asp?id=150010>.

Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »

The General Will Through The Eyes Of Rousseau Essay

- The General Will Through the Eyes of Rousseau Jean- Jacques Rousseau’s The Social Contract introduces the concept of what is commonly referred to as the common good. The common good is described as the end result that benefits the most people within a state or society. To be fully achieved as a collective unit, the common good must be agreed upon according to another political term: the general will. The general will is the desire of all the members in the state, which is put in place for the good of the society....   [tags: Political philosophy, Jean-Jacques Rousseau]

Research Papers
1280 words (3.7 pages)

Essay about Rousseau 's Discourse On Inequality

- Jean-Jacques Rousseau describes the origins of humanity in his book, Discourse on Inequality. Although Rousseau takes a hypothetical approach rather than a factual, historical approach to surmising the history of humankind, he effectively analyzes the foundations of human inequality and whether it is sanctioned by natural law. Throughout the book, Rousseau strives to outline the history of human development, beginning from the state of nature to the establishment of civil society in order to determine the origins and consequences of inequality and to question the legitimacy of political institutions....   [tags: Political philosophy, Jean-Jacques Rousseau]

Research Papers
1006 words (2.9 pages)

Essay Jean-Jacques Rousseau's The State of War

- Jean-Jacques Rousseau's "The State of War" Jean-Jacques Rousseau's "The State of War" elegantly raises a model for confederative peace among the states of Europe, and then succinctly explains its impossibility. Rousseau very systematically lays out the benefits of such a "perpetual peace" through arguments based only in a realism of pure self-interest, and then very elegantly and powerfully turns the inertia of the self-interest machinery against the same to explain why it can never come to be....   [tags: Rousseau The State of War]

Research Papers
1087 words (3.1 pages)

Essay on Comparing Locke´s Natural Law with Rousseau´s Discourse on Inequality

-   The relationship between nature, the state and individuals is a complex one; political philosophers have been studying these relationships ever since the dawn of time, with the goal being to determine the best way in which the people relate to nature. Based on the ideas of philosopher John Locke, the state does not have the ability to infringe upon the right of people to determine their own destiny; he believes that mankind’s best state is to bring the best parts of their natural instincts into society, collecting together into a “state of perfect freedom.” Conversely, philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau believed that mankind was at its best in its natural state, behaving like an animal and...   [tags: John Locke, Jean-Jacques Rousseau]

Research Papers
2789 words (8 pages)

Rousseau, Hobbes, and Locke : Interpretations of Human Nature Essay

- Through time people have always wondered what it is that makes us who we are. It has been our human nature that has kept us intrigued with ourselves, and our relationships with others. With this curiosity came various interpretations as to our human nature, each changing the way we see the societal world we live in. With each interpretation came a new understanding of people and the relationship they hold with each other. Human nature has been one of the most studied elements of the world we live in....   [tags: Rousseau, Thomas Hobbes, John Locke]

Research Papers
1594 words (4.6 pages)

General Will and Rousseau's Social Contract Essay

- When Jean Jacques Rousseau wrote the Social Contract, the concepts of liberty and freedom were not new ideas. Many political theorists such as Thomas Hobbes and John Locke had already developed their own interpretations of liberty, and in fact Locke had already published his views on the social contract. What Rousseau did was to revolutionize the concepts encompassed by such weighty words, and introduce us to another approach to the social contract dilemma. What would bring man to leave the state of nature, and enter into an organized society....   [tags: Papers Politics Rousseau]

Free Essays
1787 words (5.1 pages)

Essay about Exploring Karl Marx and Jean-Jacque Rousseau's Views on Freedom

- While the writings of Karl Marx and Jean-Jacque Rousseau occasionally seem at odds with one another both philosophers needs to be read as an extension of each other to completely understand what human freedom is. The fundamental difference between the two philosophers lies within the way which they determine why humans are not free creatures in modern society but once were. Rousseau draws on the genealogical as well as the societal aspects of human nature that, in its development, has stripped humankind of its intrinsic freedom....   [tags: philosophy]

Research Papers
1544 words (4.4 pages)

Biography of Jean-Jacques Rousseau Essays

- Biography of Jean-Jacques Rousseau MAN is born free; and everywhere he is in chains. One thinks himself the master of others, and still remains a greater slave then they. How did this change come about. I do not know. How can it be legitimate. That question I think I can answer. (Rousseau, Jean-Jacques 1997) Jean- Jacques Rousseau was born on the 25th of June 1712 in Geneva, Switzerland....   [tags: Papers]

Research Papers
1352 words (3.9 pages)

9/11 and Jean-Jacques Rousseau Essay

- 9/11 and Jean-Jacques Rousseau L'Etat C'est Moi : Absolutism in the Age of Reason By analyzing the Taliban regime and their motives, Jean-Jacques Rousseau's ideas, and by comparing the two, it will be made evident that Jean-Jacques Rousseau's ideas of government rule over people's lives is true in this specific case. On September 11, 2001 the heart of the United States of America was ripped out in a matter of 10 minutes by Islamic extremists who follow the Taliban Regime. The first attack was at 8:45 am when two planes were hijacked and crashed into the twin towers of the World Trade Centre in New York City....   [tags: American America History]

Free Essays
490 words (1.4 pages)

Jean-Jacques Rousseau Essay

- The concepts of liberty and individuality experienced a critical change in meaning and understanding as Europe shifted from the 18th century Enlightenment era to the age of political economy and utilitarianism of the 19th century. This clear distinction can be seen when comparing the works of enlightenment thinker Jean-Jacques Rousseau to authors of the 19th century, including utilitarian John Stuart Mill and communist Karl Marx. The fundamental differences in the ideas of liberty and individuality between the two centuries can be attributed to the political, economic, and social climates of each author’s time....   [tags: Philosophy, Political Science]

Research Papers
1678 words (4.8 pages)

Related Searches

e. the state, in which individuals ‘while uniting with
all……obeys only himself and remains as free as before’ (Unit, p103).
This can be achieved adopting what he calls the general will, by every
individual wanting what is best for the state, as opposed to wanting
what is best for themselves, their particular will. By adopting the
general will, the authority of the state becomes legitimate, as both
the individual and the state want the same things, therefore no-one is
forced to obey anyone else, they are actually obeying themselves.

Rousseau also argues that we will obtain civil liberty by adopting the
general will, as opposed to having only natural liberty and limited
freedom by following our particular will. He uses the example of a
brigand exercising his particular will and force to show that by
acting on particular will instead of general will, although the
brigand can get what he wants, he is infringing on someone else’s
freedom, and although he has ‘natural liberty’ he does not have ‘civil
liberty’. Civil liberty only comes from adopting the general will,
that is the will of the majority, and only be doing this can we remain
as free as in the state of nature. Rousseau realises that some people
will still act on their particular will, however he argues that it is
acceptable to

do this in circumstances where others freedom is not being affected,
in other words, in matters that only affect themselves.

Rousseau puts forward several reasons why people should obey the
general will and benefit from living in a civil society. He argues
that by the particular will, people are just slaves to their desires,
and act only on appetite; therefore they are not really free.
However, by obeying the general will and acting on reason, people
become free, as their will is the same as that of the state, and
therefore the state is legitimate. In this way, we obtain moral
liberty: ‘it substitutes justice for instinct in his behaviour and
gives his actions a moral quality they previously lacked’ (Unit,
p.111). Rousseau argues that by obtaining moral liberty it ‘makes man
truly master of himself’ (Unit, p.111) therefore being free, and this
freedom is also gained by obeying laws made by the general will:
‘obedience to the law one has prescribed for oneself is liberty.’
(Unit, p.111).

How might these same concepts be used in the interpretation of
Jacques-Louis David’s painting, The Death of Socrates?

The concepts of force, right and freedom are depicted in David’s
neo-classical history painting The Death of Socrates. David painted
this painting in 1787, a time when revolutionary ideas inspired by
Rousseau were sweeping France.

David’s painting shows Socrates sitting on his bed in prison about to
drink the hemlock which will ultimately kill him. He is situated
slightly right of the centre of the painting, with his disciples all
around him. Socrates, although an old man, has the

body of a much younger man, and is depicted as a hero. He is also
swathed in light, while all the others are in shadow; this shows him
as god like, and very alive, the light defining his muscle tone and
strength, even though he is soon to die. Socrates looks happy, while
his disciples are weeping and full of despair, their gestures
conveying utter misery and hopelessness.

There are broken chains on the floor and also on the bed, indicating
that Socrates has broken free of the chains the Rousseau claims every
man is in living in a society whereby illegitimate power must be
obeyed. Socrates was born free, but due to his philosophical beliefs
he ended up in chains, and now he would rather die than refute his
beliefs and obey the authority. Freedom of thought was very important
both to Socrates and Rousseau, and David has conveyed this is the
painting by portraying Socrates as the central character.

Plato, who was not present at this time, has been included in the
painting. He is seated at the foot of Socrates bed, deep in
contemplation and unable to watch Socrates drink the hemlock. David
has given importance to the handing of the hemlock to Socrates by
drawing our eye to it using perspective lines which are converging on
it, and by positioning it in the exact centre of the composition.

The broad tonal range, from the bright, white robe and light skin
tones, to the bright red of the figure holding the cup gives contrast
to the painting, possibly indicating right and wrong, freedom and
chains, morality and immorality, and legitimacy and

illegitimacy of authority. The background however is slightly muted,
with more sombre tones, making the figures at the front of the picture
plane stand out.

Socrates had strong beliefs about how a society should be run, and he,
like Rousseau, believed that ‘might does not equal right’ (Unit,
p.100). Rousseau’s argument that ‘To give in to force is an act of
necessity, not of will’ (Unit, p.100) reinforces this idea, and
David’s portrayal of Socrates acceptance of death in order to obey
only oneself further reinforces this argument.

David and Rousseau shared the same beliefs with regard to force, right
and freedom; David expresses these through his painting, portraying
Socrates as refusing to obey illegitimate authority, showing that
force cannot be used to make people obey you, and that Socrates can
only obtain freedom by death.
Return to 123HelpMe.com