Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Classical argument, gun ban
Essays on why new gun laws are not necessary
Reasons america should implement stricter gunlaws
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Classical argument, gun ban
Gun control is an extremely controversial topic. Some people argue that the government has no authority to restrict the citizens’ rights to bear arms. Other people argue that it is the duty of the government to protect the people by getting tougher on gun control. Usually, gun control debates take place right after a national tragedy occurs. The United States already has background checks performed on people who are seeking to buy guns from gun stores. Despite the restrictions that are already set in place, terrible shootings continue to occur. People are deeply saddened and outraged at all of the gun violence, but people still find room to argue against taking action:
“If roads were collapsing all across the United States, killing dozens of drivers, we would surely see that as a moment to talk about what we could do to keep roads from collapsing. If terrorists were detonating bombs in port after port, you can be sure Congress would be working to upgrade the nation's security measures. If a plague was ripping through communities, public-health officials would be working feverishly to contain it.” (WP)
The Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act of 1993 was created to prevent federal firearm licensees or FFL’s from selling firearms to people who are presumed to be dangerous or irresponsible. Some of the people who would fall into these categories would be ex-felons, mental health patients (past and present), illegal drug users and addicts, juveniles, people with dishonorable discharges from the armed forces, people with rejected citizenship, and illegal aliens (paper). The permanent provisions of the Brady Act, effective November 30, 1998 led to the creation the National Instant Criminal Background Check System or NICS. (FBI) Brad...
... middle of paper ...
...done. In our country it is a right to bear arms. This means that we want law-abiding citizens to own firearms. How do we make sure that only good, law-abiding citizens maintain the right to bear arms while everyone else is denied the right to bear arms? In the end the only people who follow laws are law-abiding citizens. Criminals will never be deterred or bothered by breaking laws. So in conclusion I think that background checks are not restrictive enough when it comes to keeping ineligible people from obtaining firearms from an FFL. The background check can only go so far and if there is a will, there is a way for ineligibles to obtain firearms illegally.
Works Cited
FBI. "NICS." FBI. FBI, 21 May 2010. Web. 21 Mar. 2014.
Klein, Ezra. "Twelve Facts about Guns and Mass Shootings in the United States." Washington Post. N.p., 14 Dec. 2012. Web. 20 Mar. 2014.
commit a violent crime while armed with a firearm. Every 3500 seconds, a criminal will fire his firearm during the course of the violent crime. Every three and a half hours, a victim of a violent crime will be shot. Is this due to the lack of gun control? Or is this a result of individual? Guns; a privilege or a right? The Second Amendment secures citizens’ right to bear arms. Many citizens choose to do so. There are enough firearms in the United States (about 200 million) to arm more than half
of the United States protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms. It was adopted on December 15, 1791 along with the rest of the Bill of Rights. The United States Government should not infringe on those rights by the enforcement of gun control against law-abiding citizens. Gun control does not reduce crime, does not stop criminals from obtaining guns, and does not address the real issue of violent crime. There is no evidence that gun control affects the crime rate. The United States
Gun control generally refers to laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification, or use of firearms. They vary greatly around the world. Some countries, such as the United Kingdom, have very strict limits on gun possession while others, like the United States, have, compared to most industrial democracies, relatively few restrictions . Proponents of gun control generally argue that widespread gun ownership increases the danger of gun-related crime, homicide
Gun Control and Violence in Canada The issue of gun control and violence, both in Canada and the United States, is one that simply will not go away. If history is to be any guide, no matter what the resolution to the gun control debate is, it is probable that the arguments pro and con will be much the same as they always have been. In 1977, legislation was passed by the Canadian Parliament regulating long guns for the first time, restructuring the availability of firearms, and increasing
views on armament control. To expand, he reflected praises for an oligarchy government, a government with all power, along with favoring the withdrawal of arms from citizens and a desire to enforce the holding of weapons in his state. Plato also wished to impose obligatory military training and have military operations once a month, as mentioned by Earl R. Kruschke in his book Gun Control: A Reference Handbook. The policies that Plato once respected, have similar qualities to laws in place and in consideration
Gun control is a hot issue in the wake of so many recent, tragic mass shootings. So, what is gun control? Gun control which is also known as firearms regulations refers to laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification, or use of firearms. Some people would argue that gun control is generally a widespread of gun ownership that increases the danger of gun violence while others would argue that gun control does not increase the crime rate as far as gun violence;
strict laws that allow only hunting rifle use, and laws that allow more freedom has been argued over for many years. The best argument protecting the Second Amendment is that people have more security when possessing a gun. Although this is possibly true, gun control provides much more than comfort for the people. The second amendment has some benefits, but many dangers also come with having the right to own a gun. One of these dangers includes violence and death with our youth. If Gun Control laws
gun control and violence, both in Canada and the United States, is one that simply will not go away. If history is to be any guide, no matter what the resolution to the gun control debate is, it is probable that the arguments pro and con will be much the same as they always have been. In 1977, legislation was passed by the Canadian Parliament regulating long guns for the first time, restructuring the availability of firearms, and increasing a variety of penalties . Canadian firearms law is primarily
Gun Control Adolf Hitler once said, “To conquer a nation, first disarm its citizens.” The United States has roughly 300 million guns owned by citizens, and while gun control claims that it will not take away all guns and merely regulate them, many people feel a danger to giving gun control any footing. While gun control advocates believe that gun control will equal less illegal activity, it is too easy to buy firearms online, and that nobody needs an assault style rifle, research shows that criminals
Gun Control in the United States Gun control is a very heated issue within the country. There are advocates for both sides for wanting stricter gun control and less gun control. Firearms are such a big part of American history that it has been included in our constitution as one of our inalienable rights. The people who want stricter gun control believe that making it harder to get guns and limiting the types of guns people can use makes everyone safer since there’s less firearms in the public. Those
nti-Gun Control Gun control has stirred an incredible amount heated debates and controversy in this country. Both sides believe that their view is the correct view. The question remains: Will controlling firearms result in less firearm deaths? The answer to that question is no. This is both proven and obvious. First is the point that criminals have never and will never obey the law, which is why they are criminals. The United Kingdom has an incredibly strict gun control policy but yet their murders
people believe that extremely tight gun control laws will eliminate crime, but gun control laws only prevent the 'good guys' from obtaining firearms. Criminals will always have ways of getting weapons, whether it be from the black market, cross borders, or illegal street sales. New gun control laws will not stop them. Since the shootings of Columbine High School, Virginia Tech, and Sandy Hook, the frequency of mass shootings has increased greatly. Gun control is not effective as it has not been shown
United States Vs. Gun Control The gun control debate may be one of the most important issues in our society. Gun control is the set of laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification, or use of firearms by civilians. Stricter gun control laws are needed since gun control makes weapons less accessible to criminals and the mentally ill, it can reduce the number of homicides, suicides, and accidental shootings in our country. Shootings in the United States has
injuries in the United States? Gun Control has been a heavily debated and controversial topic throughout the United States. In 2013, 30,000 people died of gunshot wounds in America. After the prohibition of the “Gun Control Act of 1968,” there was a massive increase in homicide and suicide. Because there are so many shootings and unnecessary death today everywhere in the United States because of guns, the nation should adopt a universal gun control system enforcing stricter gun control laws, including
Gun control is an extremely controversial topic that is brought up in the media quite frequently. This subject, like most debated topics, contains extreme views from both sides. The gun control activist will argue that guns are a direct source of violence and should have strict regulations to reduce the amount of gun violence within the population. On the the other side, the viewpoint of an anti-gun control activist would be to uphold their second amendment right to bear arms. This activist would